中文自动文本方法的设计与评价

Jyh-Jong Tsay, Jing-doo Wang
{"title":"中文自动文本方法的设计与评价","authors":"Jyh-Jong Tsay, Jing-doo Wang","doi":"10.30019/IJCLCLP.200008.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we propose and evaluate approaches to categorizing Chinese texts, which consist of term extraction, term selection, term clustering and text classification. We propose a scalable approach which uses frequency counts to identify left and right boundaries of possibly significant terms. We used the combination of term selection and term clustering to reduce the dimension of the vector space to a practical level. While the huge number of possible Chinese terms makes most of the machine learning algorithms impractical, results obtained in an experiment on a CAN news collection show that the dimension could be dramatically reduced to 1200 while approximately the same level of classification accuracy was maintained using our approach. We also studied and compared the performance of three well known classifiers, the Rocchio linear classifier, naive Bayes probabilistic classifier and k-nearest neighbors (kNN) classifier, when they were applied to categorize Chinese texts. Overall, kNN achieved the best accuracy, about 78.3%, but required large amounts of computation time and memory when used to classify new texts. Rocchio was very time and memory efficient, and achieved a high level of accuracy, about 75.4%. In practical implementation, Rocchio may be a good choice.","PeriodicalId":436300,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Comput. Linguistics Chin. Lang. Process.","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design and Evaluation of Approaches for Automatic Chinese Text\",\"authors\":\"Jyh-Jong Tsay, Jing-doo Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.30019/IJCLCLP.200008.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we propose and evaluate approaches to categorizing Chinese texts, which consist of term extraction, term selection, term clustering and text classification. We propose a scalable approach which uses frequency counts to identify left and right boundaries of possibly significant terms. We used the combination of term selection and term clustering to reduce the dimension of the vector space to a practical level. While the huge number of possible Chinese terms makes most of the machine learning algorithms impractical, results obtained in an experiment on a CAN news collection show that the dimension could be dramatically reduced to 1200 while approximately the same level of classification accuracy was maintained using our approach. We also studied and compared the performance of three well known classifiers, the Rocchio linear classifier, naive Bayes probabilistic classifier and k-nearest neighbors (kNN) classifier, when they were applied to categorize Chinese texts. Overall, kNN achieved the best accuracy, about 78.3%, but required large amounts of computation time and memory when used to classify new texts. Rocchio was very time and memory efficient, and achieved a high level of accuracy, about 75.4%. In practical implementation, Rocchio may be a good choice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Comput. Linguistics Chin. Lang. Process.\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Comput. Linguistics Chin. Lang. Process.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30019/IJCLCLP.200008.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Comput. Linguistics Chin. Lang. Process.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30019/IJCLCLP.200008.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文提出并评价了几种中文文本分类方法,包括术语提取、术语选择、术语聚类和文本分类。我们提出了一种可扩展的方法,该方法使用频率计数来识别可能重要的术语的左右边界。我们使用术语选择和术语聚类相结合的方法将向量空间的维数降低到一个实用的水平。虽然大量可能的中文术语使得大多数机器学习算法不切实际,但在CAN新闻集的实验中获得的结果表明,使用我们的方法可以显着降低到1200维,同时保持大致相同的分类精度水平。我们还研究并比较了三种常用分类器Rocchio线性分类器、朴素贝叶斯概率分类器和k近邻分类器在中文文本分类中的性能。总的来说,kNN达到了最好的准确率,约为78.3%,但在对新文本进行分类时需要大量的计算时间和内存。Rocchio非常节省时间和记忆,并达到了高水平的准确率,约为75.4%。在实际实施中,Rocchio可能是一个不错的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design and Evaluation of Approaches for Automatic Chinese Text
In this paper, we propose and evaluate approaches to categorizing Chinese texts, which consist of term extraction, term selection, term clustering and text classification. We propose a scalable approach which uses frequency counts to identify left and right boundaries of possibly significant terms. We used the combination of term selection and term clustering to reduce the dimension of the vector space to a practical level. While the huge number of possible Chinese terms makes most of the machine learning algorithms impractical, results obtained in an experiment on a CAN news collection show that the dimension could be dramatically reduced to 1200 while approximately the same level of classification accuracy was maintained using our approach. We also studied and compared the performance of three well known classifiers, the Rocchio linear classifier, naive Bayes probabilistic classifier and k-nearest neighbors (kNN) classifier, when they were applied to categorize Chinese texts. Overall, kNN achieved the best accuracy, about 78.3%, but required large amounts of computation time and memory when used to classify new texts. Rocchio was very time and memory efficient, and achieved a high level of accuracy, about 75.4%. In practical implementation, Rocchio may be a good choice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信