重新设计德国平衡电力市场——一项关键评估

C. Growitsch, Margarethe Rammerstorfer, Christoph Weber
{"title":"重新设计德国平衡电力市场——一项关键评估","authors":"C. Growitsch, Margarethe Rammerstorfer, Christoph Weber","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2008.4579025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since electrical energy cannot be stored the maintenance of balance between supply and demand in the grid is one major task of the system operator. His duty is to estimate beforehand how much energy will be injected in or withdrawn from the network. Therefore, an efficient and appropriate designed market is a necessary component in order to assist the balancing management. In awareness of this, the following study examines the effects of the auction redesign on observable demand charges. We analyze the consequences caused by the launch of the common IT platform on power balance charges, particularly with regard to expected values and volatility. This allows further conclusions about possible difficulties resulting from the new market design and which may contradict the assistance for managing the grid balance. Furthermore, we compare the efficiency of the German power reserve market before and after the change of the market design by using a number of econometric approaches for analyzing structural changes. With the view to assist the establishment of a secure German energy network, we finally draw economic conclusions.","PeriodicalId":118618,"journal":{"name":"2008 5th International Conference on the European Electricity Market","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Redesigning the balancing power market in Germany — a critical assessment\",\"authors\":\"C. Growitsch, Margarethe Rammerstorfer, Christoph Weber\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EEM.2008.4579025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since electrical energy cannot be stored the maintenance of balance between supply and demand in the grid is one major task of the system operator. His duty is to estimate beforehand how much energy will be injected in or withdrawn from the network. Therefore, an efficient and appropriate designed market is a necessary component in order to assist the balancing management. In awareness of this, the following study examines the effects of the auction redesign on observable demand charges. We analyze the consequences caused by the launch of the common IT platform on power balance charges, particularly with regard to expected values and volatility. This allows further conclusions about possible difficulties resulting from the new market design and which may contradict the assistance for managing the grid balance. Furthermore, we compare the efficiency of the German power reserve market before and after the change of the market design by using a number of econometric approaches for analyzing structural changes. With the view to assist the establishment of a secure German energy network, we finally draw economic conclusions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 5th International Conference on the European Electricity Market\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 5th International Conference on the European Electricity Market\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2008.4579025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 5th International Conference on the European Electricity Market","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2008.4579025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

由于电能不能储存,维持电网的供需平衡是系统操作员的主要任务之一。他的职责是事先估计将有多少能量注入网络或从网络中抽出。因此,一个高效、合理的设计市场是辅助平衡管理的必要组成部分。意识到这一点,下面的研究考察了拍卖重新设计对可观察需求收费的影响。我们分析了公共IT平台的推出对电力平衡费用造成的影响,特别是关于期望值和波动性。这可以进一步得出关于新市场设计可能带来的困难的结论,这可能与帮助管理电网平衡相矛盾。在此基础上,本文运用多种计量经济学方法对德国电力储备市场结构变化前后的效率进行了比较。为了帮助建立一个安全的德国能源网络,我们最终得出了经济结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Redesigning the balancing power market in Germany — a critical assessment
Since electrical energy cannot be stored the maintenance of balance between supply and demand in the grid is one major task of the system operator. His duty is to estimate beforehand how much energy will be injected in or withdrawn from the network. Therefore, an efficient and appropriate designed market is a necessary component in order to assist the balancing management. In awareness of this, the following study examines the effects of the auction redesign on observable demand charges. We analyze the consequences caused by the launch of the common IT platform on power balance charges, particularly with regard to expected values and volatility. This allows further conclusions about possible difficulties resulting from the new market design and which may contradict the assistance for managing the grid balance. Furthermore, we compare the efficiency of the German power reserve market before and after the change of the market design by using a number of econometric approaches for analyzing structural changes. With the view to assist the establishment of a secure German energy network, we finally draw economic conclusions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信