呼吸窦性心律失常系统响应呼吸频率增加的频率耦合和灵敏度谱测量

A. Guillén-Mandujano, S. Carrasco-Sosa, P. Coello-Caballero
{"title":"呼吸窦性心律失常系统响应呼吸频率增加的频率耦合和灵敏度谱测量","authors":"A. Guillén-Mandujano, S. Carrasco-Sosa, P. Coello-Caballero","doi":"10.22489/CinC.2020.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 19 healthy subjects we assessed the effects of chirped respiratory frequency (RF) from 0.05 to 0.8 Hz, and of standing (STC) on the 130-s time courses of the central frequency and power of the high frequency components of RR (<inf>CFE</inf>HF<inf>RR</inf>, <inf>PE</inf>HF<inf>RR</inf>) and of respiration (<inf>CFE</inf>HF<inf>RES</inf>, <inf>PE</inf>HF<inf>RES</inf>), estimated by a time-frequency distribution. We took as indexes of respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) frequency coupling (RSA<inf>FC</inf>) the <inf>CFE</inf>HF<inf>RES</inf>-<inf>CFE</inf>HF<inf>RR</inf> relation, their difference (Δ<inf>CFE</inf>HF) and coherence (RSA<inf>co</inf>), and the alpha index as RSA sensitivity (RSAs). The effects of RF on RSA measures were distinctive in three RF ranges, with precise limits at 0.09±0. 005, 0.18±0.03, 0.51±0.10 and 0.81±0.03 Hz. In the low, mid and high RF ranges, respectively: <inf>CFE</inf>HF<inf>RR</inf> was first unchanged, proportional to RF (r=0.97±0.03), then constant again; RSA<inf>co</inf> was 0.73±0.06, 0.97±0.03 and 0.78±0.08; RSA<inf>s</inf> was 135±34 ms/l, proportional to RF (r=-0. 79±0.08), and 62±30 ms/l; Δ<inf>CFE</inf>HF was greater than 0.02 Hz in the three RF stages. STC decreased mean RSA<inf>s</inf> (p<0.02) in all RF stages. RSA<inf>FC</inf> and RSA<inf>s</inf> measures vary as function of RF, showing three stages with precise RF limits and distinctive functionality, respectively: low for RSA<inf>FC</inf> but high for RSA<inf>s</inf>, optimal and linear for both, and reduced for both measures. Baroreflex activation significantly depresses RSA<inf>s</inf>.","PeriodicalId":407282,"journal":{"name":"2020 Computing in Cardiology","volume":"116 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency Coupling and Sensitivity Spectral Measures of the Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia System in Response to Increasing Respiratory Frequency\",\"authors\":\"A. Guillén-Mandujano, S. Carrasco-Sosa, P. Coello-Caballero\",\"doi\":\"10.22489/CinC.2020.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 19 healthy subjects we assessed the effects of chirped respiratory frequency (RF) from 0.05 to 0.8 Hz, and of standing (STC) on the 130-s time courses of the central frequency and power of the high frequency components of RR (<inf>CFE</inf>HF<inf>RR</inf>, <inf>PE</inf>HF<inf>RR</inf>) and of respiration (<inf>CFE</inf>HF<inf>RES</inf>, <inf>PE</inf>HF<inf>RES</inf>), estimated by a time-frequency distribution. We took as indexes of respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) frequency coupling (RSA<inf>FC</inf>) the <inf>CFE</inf>HF<inf>RES</inf>-<inf>CFE</inf>HF<inf>RR</inf> relation, their difference (Δ<inf>CFE</inf>HF) and coherence (RSA<inf>co</inf>), and the alpha index as RSA sensitivity (RSAs). The effects of RF on RSA measures were distinctive in three RF ranges, with precise limits at 0.09±0. 005, 0.18±0.03, 0.51±0.10 and 0.81±0.03 Hz. In the low, mid and high RF ranges, respectively: <inf>CFE</inf>HF<inf>RR</inf> was first unchanged, proportional to RF (r=0.97±0.03), then constant again; RSA<inf>co</inf> was 0.73±0.06, 0.97±0.03 and 0.78±0.08; RSA<inf>s</inf> was 135±34 ms/l, proportional to RF (r=-0. 79±0.08), and 62±30 ms/l; Δ<inf>CFE</inf>HF was greater than 0.02 Hz in the three RF stages. STC decreased mean RSA<inf>s</inf> (p<0.02) in all RF stages. RSA<inf>FC</inf> and RSA<inf>s</inf> measures vary as function of RF, showing three stages with precise RF limits and distinctive functionality, respectively: low for RSA<inf>FC</inf> but high for RSA<inf>s</inf>, optimal and linear for both, and reduced for both measures. Baroreflex activation significantly depresses RSA<inf>s</inf>.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 Computing in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"116 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 Computing in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2020.026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Computing in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2020.026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在19名健康受试者中,我们评估了0.05 ~ 0.8 Hz的啁啾呼吸频率(RF)和站立(STC)对RR (CFEHFRR, PEHFRR)和呼吸(CFEHFRES, PEHFRES)高频分量的中心频率和功率的130-s时间过程的影响。我们以cfehfress - cfehfrr关系及其差值(ΔCFEHF)和相干性(RSAco)作为呼吸性窦性心律失常(RSA)频率耦合(RSAFC)的指标,α指数作为RSA敏感性(RSAs)的指标。射频对RSA测量的影响在三个射频范围内是不同的,精确的界限为0.09±0。005、0.18±0.03、0.51±0.10、0.81±0.03 Hz。在低、中、高射频范围内,CFEHFRR先保持不变,后与射频成正比(r=0.97±0.03),再保持不变;RSAco分别为0.73±0.06、0.97±0.03和0.78±0.08;rsa为135±34 ms/l,与RF成正比(r=-0)。79±0.08 ms/l, 62±30 ms/l;ΔCFEHF在三个RF阶段均大于0.02 Hz。STC降低了平均rsa (pFC和rsa测量值随RF的变化而变化,分别表现为三个阶段,具有精确的RF限制和独特的功能:RSAFC低,rsa高,两者均为最佳和线性,两种测量值均降低。应激反射激活显著抑制RSAs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frequency Coupling and Sensitivity Spectral Measures of the Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia System in Response to Increasing Respiratory Frequency
In 19 healthy subjects we assessed the effects of chirped respiratory frequency (RF) from 0.05 to 0.8 Hz, and of standing (STC) on the 130-s time courses of the central frequency and power of the high frequency components of RR (CFEHFRR, PEHFRR) and of respiration (CFEHFRES, PEHFRES), estimated by a time-frequency distribution. We took as indexes of respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) frequency coupling (RSAFC) the CFEHFRES-CFEHFRR relation, their difference (ΔCFEHF) and coherence (RSAco), and the alpha index as RSA sensitivity (RSAs). The effects of RF on RSA measures were distinctive in three RF ranges, with precise limits at 0.09±0. 005, 0.18±0.03, 0.51±0.10 and 0.81±0.03 Hz. In the low, mid and high RF ranges, respectively: CFEHFRR was first unchanged, proportional to RF (r=0.97±0.03), then constant again; RSAco was 0.73±0.06, 0.97±0.03 and 0.78±0.08; RSAs was 135±34 ms/l, proportional to RF (r=-0. 79±0.08), and 62±30 ms/l; ΔCFEHF was greater than 0.02 Hz in the three RF stages. STC decreased mean RSAs (p<0.02) in all RF stages. RSAFC and RSAs measures vary as function of RF, showing three stages with precise RF limits and distinctive functionality, respectively: low for RSAFC but high for RSAs, optimal and linear for both, and reduced for both measures. Baroreflex activation significantly depresses RSAs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信