恢复性司法犯罪对儿童演员的司法盗窃尊严透视

Hervina Puspitosari
{"title":"恢复性司法犯罪对儿童演员的司法盗窃尊严透视","authors":"Hervina Puspitosari","doi":"10.33005/vjj.v2i2.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract                                                                              \nVarious factors the cause of children committing crimes, especially in this discussion are children who are perpetrators of the crime of theft. Various problems of children as perpetrators of criminal acts of theft that occur. The act of a child committing theft is a violation of the law and has been regulated in the Criminal Code as formulated in the provisions of Articles 362, 363 and 365 of the Criminal Code. Various negative impacts of imposing punishment on children who commit the crime of theft causing dehumanization (decreased human values), prisonization (the influence of learning crime) and stigmatization (bad labels) are also taken into consideration in encouraging the birth of a diversion policy in Indonesia. The problem that arises is how the application of diversion to child perpetrators of the crime of theft is made aware of restorative justice in the perspective of dignified justice that prioritizes the future of the child. In child protection, there are 4 basic principles, namely: non-discrimination; the best interests of the child; survival, growth and development, respect for children's opinions. Thus, in the perspective of child protection, there is no punishment for children and there is no prison for children. So that in cases of children, perpetrators of the crime of theft should prioritize diversion against children with more emphasis on dignified justice for children. \nKeywords: Restorative Justice, Tna, Theft, Dignified Justice","PeriodicalId":207960,"journal":{"name":"Veteran Justice Journal","volume":"34 10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restorative Justice Crime Against Child Actors In The Perspective Of Justice Theft Dignified\",\"authors\":\"Hervina Puspitosari\",\"doi\":\"10.33005/vjj.v2i2.46\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract                                                                              \\nVarious factors the cause of children committing crimes, especially in this discussion are children who are perpetrators of the crime of theft. Various problems of children as perpetrators of criminal acts of theft that occur. The act of a child committing theft is a violation of the law and has been regulated in the Criminal Code as formulated in the provisions of Articles 362, 363 and 365 of the Criminal Code. Various negative impacts of imposing punishment on children who commit the crime of theft causing dehumanization (decreased human values), prisonization (the influence of learning crime) and stigmatization (bad labels) are also taken into consideration in encouraging the birth of a diversion policy in Indonesia. The problem that arises is how the application of diversion to child perpetrators of the crime of theft is made aware of restorative justice in the perspective of dignified justice that prioritizes the future of the child. In child protection, there are 4 basic principles, namely: non-discrimination; the best interests of the child; survival, growth and development, respect for children's opinions. Thus, in the perspective of child protection, there is no punishment for children and there is no prison for children. So that in cases of children, perpetrators of the crime of theft should prioritize diversion against children with more emphasis on dignified justice for children. \\nKeywords: Restorative Justice, Tna, Theft, Dignified Justice\",\"PeriodicalId\":207960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veteran Justice Journal\",\"volume\":\"34 10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veteran Justice Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33005/vjj.v2i2.46\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veteran Justice Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33005/vjj.v2i2.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文摘                                                                               各种因素导致孩子犯罪,尤其是在这个讨论是盗窃犯罪的罪犯的孩子。各种问题的儿童作为罪犯的盗窃行为时有发生。儿童盗窃的行为是违反法律的行为,并在《刑法》第362、363和365条规定的《刑法》中加以规定。在鼓励在印度尼西亚制定转移政策时,还考虑到对犯有盗窃罪的儿童施加惩罚的各种负面影响,造成非人化(人的价值下降)、监禁(学习犯罪的影响)和污名化(不良标签)。由此产生的问题是,如何从优先考虑儿童未来的有尊严的司法角度,使对犯有盗窃罪的儿童罪犯实行转移的做法认识到恢复性司法。在儿童保护方面,有4项基本原则,即:不歧视;儿童的最大利益;生存、成长、发展,尊重孩子的意见。因此,从儿童保护的角度来看,没有对儿童的惩罚,也没有对儿童的监狱。因此,在涉及儿童的案件中,盗窃罪的肇事者应优先转向儿童,更加强调对儿童的有尊严的正义。关键词:恢复性司法,盗窃,尊严司法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Restorative Justice Crime Against Child Actors In The Perspective Of Justice Theft Dignified
Abstract                                                                              Various factors the cause of children committing crimes, especially in this discussion are children who are perpetrators of the crime of theft. Various problems of children as perpetrators of criminal acts of theft that occur. The act of a child committing theft is a violation of the law and has been regulated in the Criminal Code as formulated in the provisions of Articles 362, 363 and 365 of the Criminal Code. Various negative impacts of imposing punishment on children who commit the crime of theft causing dehumanization (decreased human values), prisonization (the influence of learning crime) and stigmatization (bad labels) are also taken into consideration in encouraging the birth of a diversion policy in Indonesia. The problem that arises is how the application of diversion to child perpetrators of the crime of theft is made aware of restorative justice in the perspective of dignified justice that prioritizes the future of the child. In child protection, there are 4 basic principles, namely: non-discrimination; the best interests of the child; survival, growth and development, respect for children's opinions. Thus, in the perspective of child protection, there is no punishment for children and there is no prison for children. So that in cases of children, perpetrators of the crime of theft should prioritize diversion against children with more emphasis on dignified justice for children. Keywords: Restorative Justice, Tna, Theft, Dignified Justice
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信