分布式系统监控与信息服务的性能研究

Xuehai Zhang, Jeffrey L. Freschl, J. Schopf
{"title":"分布式系统监控与信息服务的性能研究","authors":"Xuehai Zhang, Jeffrey L. Freschl, J. Schopf","doi":"10.1109/HPDC.2003.1210036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Monitoring and information services form a key component of a distributed system, or Grid. A quantitative study of such services can aid in understanding the performance limitations, advise in the deployment of the monitoring system, and help evaluate future development work. To this end, we study the performance of three monitoring and information services for distributed systems: the Globus Toolkit/spl reg/ Monitoring and Discovery Service (MDS2), the European Data Grid Relational Grid Monitoring Architecture (R-GMA) and Hawkeye, part of the Condor project. We perform experiments to test their scalability with respect to number of users, number of resources and amount of data collected. Our study shows that each approach has different behaviors, often due to their different design goals. In the four sets of experiments we conducted to evaluate the performance of the service components under different circumstances, we found a strong advantage to caching or pre-fetching the data, as well as the need to have primary components at well-connected sites because of the high load seen by all systems.","PeriodicalId":430378,"journal":{"name":"High Performance Distributed Computing, 2003. Proceedings. 12th IEEE International Symposium on","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"233","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A performance study of monitoring and information services for distributed systems\",\"authors\":\"Xuehai Zhang, Jeffrey L. Freschl, J. Schopf\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HPDC.2003.1210036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Monitoring and information services form a key component of a distributed system, or Grid. A quantitative study of such services can aid in understanding the performance limitations, advise in the deployment of the monitoring system, and help evaluate future development work. To this end, we study the performance of three monitoring and information services for distributed systems: the Globus Toolkit/spl reg/ Monitoring and Discovery Service (MDS2), the European Data Grid Relational Grid Monitoring Architecture (R-GMA) and Hawkeye, part of the Condor project. We perform experiments to test their scalability with respect to number of users, number of resources and amount of data collected. Our study shows that each approach has different behaviors, often due to their different design goals. In the four sets of experiments we conducted to evaluate the performance of the service components under different circumstances, we found a strong advantage to caching or pre-fetching the data, as well as the need to have primary components at well-connected sites because of the high load seen by all systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"High Performance Distributed Computing, 2003. Proceedings. 12th IEEE International Symposium on\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"233\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"High Performance Distributed Computing, 2003. Proceedings. 12th IEEE International Symposium on\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HPDC.2003.1210036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"High Performance Distributed Computing, 2003. Proceedings. 12th IEEE International Symposium on","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HPDC.2003.1210036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 233

摘要

监控和信息服务是分布式系统或网格的关键组成部分。对这些服务进行定量研究有助于了解性能限制,为监测系统的部署提供建议,并有助于评估未来的开发工作。为此,我们研究了三种分布式系统监控和信息服务的性能:Globus Toolkit/spl reg/ monitoring and Discovery Service (MDS2)、European Data Grid Relational Grid monitoring Architecture (R-GMA)和鹰眼(Hawkeye),这是秃鹰项目的一部分。我们执行实验来测试它们在用户数量、资源数量和收集的数据量方面的可伸缩性。我们的研究表明,每种方法都有不同的行为,通常是由于它们的设计目标不同。在我们进行的四组实验中,我们评估了不同情况下服务组件的性能,我们发现缓存或预获取数据具有很强的优势,并且需要在连接良好的站点上拥有主要组件,因为所有系统都看到了高负载。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A performance study of monitoring and information services for distributed systems
Monitoring and information services form a key component of a distributed system, or Grid. A quantitative study of such services can aid in understanding the performance limitations, advise in the deployment of the monitoring system, and help evaluate future development work. To this end, we study the performance of three monitoring and information services for distributed systems: the Globus Toolkit/spl reg/ Monitoring and Discovery Service (MDS2), the European Data Grid Relational Grid Monitoring Architecture (R-GMA) and Hawkeye, part of the Condor project. We perform experiments to test their scalability with respect to number of users, number of resources and amount of data collected. Our study shows that each approach has different behaviors, often due to their different design goals. In the four sets of experiments we conducted to evaluate the performance of the service components under different circumstances, we found a strong advantage to caching or pre-fetching the data, as well as the need to have primary components at well-connected sites because of the high load seen by all systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信