作为分数的度量的上下文操作化:我的度量值好吗?

Sebastian Hönel, Morgan Ericsson, Welf Löwe, Anna Wingkvist
{"title":"作为分数的度量的上下文操作化:我的度量值好吗?","authors":"Sebastian Hönel, Morgan Ericsson, Welf Löwe, Anna Wingkvist","doi":"10.1109/QRS57517.2022.00042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software quality models aggregate metrics to indicate quality. Most metrics reflect counts derived from events or attributes that cannot directly be associated with quality. Worse, what constitutes a desirable value for a metric may vary across contexts. We demonstrate an approach to transforming arbitrary metrics into absolute quality scores by leveraging metrics captured from similar contexts. In contrast to metrics, scores represent freestanding quality properties that are also comparable. We provide a web-based tool for obtaining contextualized scores for metrics as obtained from one’s software. Our results indicate that significant differences among various metrics and contexts exist. The suggested approach works with arbitrary contexts. Given sufficient contextual information, it allows for answering the question of whether a metric value is good/bad or common/extreme.","PeriodicalId":143812,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contextual Operationalization of Metrics as Scores: Is My Metric Value Good?\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Hönel, Morgan Ericsson, Welf Löwe, Anna Wingkvist\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QRS57517.2022.00042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software quality models aggregate metrics to indicate quality. Most metrics reflect counts derived from events or attributes that cannot directly be associated with quality. Worse, what constitutes a desirable value for a metric may vary across contexts. We demonstrate an approach to transforming arbitrary metrics into absolute quality scores by leveraging metrics captured from similar contexts. In contrast to metrics, scores represent freestanding quality properties that are also comparable. We provide a web-based tool for obtaining contextualized scores for metrics as obtained from one’s software. Our results indicate that significant differences among various metrics and contexts exist. The suggested approach works with arbitrary contexts. Given sufficient contextual information, it allows for answering the question of whether a metric value is good/bad or common/extreme.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS57517.2022.00042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS57517.2022.00042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

软件质量模型集合度量来指示质量。大多数度量标准反映的计数来源于不能直接与质量相关联的事件或属性。更糟糕的是,在不同的环境中,度量标准的理想值可能会有所不同。我们演示了一种方法,通过利用从类似环境中捕获的度量将任意度量转换为绝对质量分数。与指标相比,分数代表了独立的质量属性,这些属性也具有可比性。我们提供了一个基于网络的工具,用于从一个人的软件中获得指标的情境化分数。我们的研究结果表明,在不同的度量标准和上下文之间存在显著差异。建议的方法适用于任意上下文。给定足够的上下文信息,它允许回答度量值是好/坏或普通/极端的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contextual Operationalization of Metrics as Scores: Is My Metric Value Good?
Software quality models aggregate metrics to indicate quality. Most metrics reflect counts derived from events or attributes that cannot directly be associated with quality. Worse, what constitutes a desirable value for a metric may vary across contexts. We demonstrate an approach to transforming arbitrary metrics into absolute quality scores by leveraging metrics captured from similar contexts. In contrast to metrics, scores represent freestanding quality properties that are also comparable. We provide a web-based tool for obtaining contextualized scores for metrics as obtained from one’s software. Our results indicate that significant differences among various metrics and contexts exist. The suggested approach works with arbitrary contexts. Given sufficient contextual information, it allows for answering the question of whether a metric value is good/bad or common/extreme.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信