{"title":"肯塔基州路易斯维尔的401(k)目标日期基金管理:计划受托人是否代表计划参与者的唯一利益?","authors":"R. Madison","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2503537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is a condensed version of the study that addresses whether plan fiduciaries make decisions regarding which target-date funds to include on their respective plan investment menus based upon a due diligence process or due to an established relationships (i.e, party-in-interest) with the target-date provider. Target-date funds are becoming the most popular default option chosen by plan fiduciaries since the passage of the Qualified Default Investment Alternative (QDIA) Regulation (29 CFR Section 2550.404c-5), which was passed a part of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. The 401(k) plans reviewed in this study were administered in the Louisville, Kentucky metropolitan statistical area, had at least 1,000 participants and had at least $5,000,000 in total assets as of December 31, 2011. Twenty seven 401(k) plans in Louisville, Kentucky metropolitan statistical area (excluding any 401(k) plans from Indiana) met the criteria. The study examines these local defined contribution 401(k) plans specifically with regard to administration fees and overall performance based upon independent analysis from BrightScope, Inc., Morningstar, Inc. and Target Date Analytics, LLC.","PeriodicalId":262144,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Private Law - Labor & Employment Law (Topic)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"401(k) Target-Date Fund Administration in Louisville, Kentucky: Are Plan Fiduciaries Acting in the Sole Interest of Plan Participants?\",\"authors\":\"R. Madison\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2503537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is a condensed version of the study that addresses whether plan fiduciaries make decisions regarding which target-date funds to include on their respective plan investment menus based upon a due diligence process or due to an established relationships (i.e, party-in-interest) with the target-date provider. Target-date funds are becoming the most popular default option chosen by plan fiduciaries since the passage of the Qualified Default Investment Alternative (QDIA) Regulation (29 CFR Section 2550.404c-5), which was passed a part of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. The 401(k) plans reviewed in this study were administered in the Louisville, Kentucky metropolitan statistical area, had at least 1,000 participants and had at least $5,000,000 in total assets as of December 31, 2011. Twenty seven 401(k) plans in Louisville, Kentucky metropolitan statistical area (excluding any 401(k) plans from Indiana) met the criteria. The study examines these local defined contribution 401(k) plans specifically with regard to administration fees and overall performance based upon independent analysis from BrightScope, Inc., Morningstar, Inc. and Target Date Analytics, LLC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Other Law & Society: Private Law - Labor & Employment Law (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Other Law & Society: Private Law - Labor & Employment Law (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2503537\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Other Law & Society: Private Law - Labor & Employment Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2503537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文是该研究的浓缩版,讨论了计划受托人是基于尽职调查过程还是基于与目标日期提供者建立的关系(即利益相关方)来决定将哪些目标日期基金纳入其各自的计划投资菜单。自合格违约投资替代(QDIA)法规(29 CFR Section 2550.404c-5)通过以来,目标日期基金正成为计划受托人选择的最受欢迎的违约选择。该法规是2006年养老金保护法案的一部分。本研究审查的401(k)计划在肯塔基州路易斯维尔大都会统计区进行管理,截至2011年12月31日,至少有1,000名参与者,总资产至少为5,000,000美元。肯塔基州路易斯维尔大都会统计区的27个401(k)计划(不包括印第安纳州的任何401(k)计划)符合标准。该研究基于BrightScope, Inc., Morningstar, Inc.和Target Date Analytics, LLC的独立分析,对这些本地固定缴款401(k)计划进行了具体的管理费用和整体绩效分析。
401(k) Target-Date Fund Administration in Louisville, Kentucky: Are Plan Fiduciaries Acting in the Sole Interest of Plan Participants?
This article is a condensed version of the study that addresses whether plan fiduciaries make decisions regarding which target-date funds to include on their respective plan investment menus based upon a due diligence process or due to an established relationships (i.e, party-in-interest) with the target-date provider. Target-date funds are becoming the most popular default option chosen by plan fiduciaries since the passage of the Qualified Default Investment Alternative (QDIA) Regulation (29 CFR Section 2550.404c-5), which was passed a part of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. The 401(k) plans reviewed in this study were administered in the Louisville, Kentucky metropolitan statistical area, had at least 1,000 participants and had at least $5,000,000 in total assets as of December 31, 2011. Twenty seven 401(k) plans in Louisville, Kentucky metropolitan statistical area (excluding any 401(k) plans from Indiana) met the criteria. The study examines these local defined contribution 401(k) plans specifically with regard to administration fees and overall performance based upon independent analysis from BrightScope, Inc., Morningstar, Inc. and Target Date Analytics, LLC.