近似Gomory-Hu树比n - 1最大流更快

Jason Li, Debmalya Panigrahi
{"title":"近似Gomory-Hu树比n - 1最大流更快","authors":"Jason Li, Debmalya Panigrahi","doi":"10.1145/3406325.3451112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Gomory-Hu tree or cut tree (Gomory and Hu, 1961) is a classic data structure for reporting s−t mincuts (and by duality, the values of s−t maxflows) for all pairs of vertices s and t in an undirected graph. Gomory and Hu showed that it can be computed using n−1 exact maxflow computations. Surprisingly, this remains the best algorithm for Gomory-Hu trees more than 50 years later, even for approximate mincuts. In this paper, we break this longstanding barrier and give an algorithm for computing a (1+є)-approximate Gomory-Hu tree using log(n) maxflow computations. Specifically, we obtain the runtime bounds we describe below. We obtain a randomized (Monte Carlo) algorithm for undirected, weighted graphs that runs in Õ(m + n3/2) time and returns a (1+є)-approximate Gomory-Hu tree algorithm whp. Previously, the best running time known was Õ(n5/2), which is obtained by running Gomory and Hu’s original algorithm on a cut sparsifier of the graph. Next, we obtain a randomized (Monte Carlo) algorithm for undirected, unweighted graphs that runs in m4/3+o(1) time and returns a (1+є)-approximate Gomory-Hu tree algorithm whp. This improves on our first result for sparse graphs, namely m = o(n9/8). Previously, the best running time known for unweighted graphs was Õ(mn) for an exact Gomory-Hu tree (Bhalgat et al., STOC 2007); no better result was known if approximations are allowed. As a consequence of our Gomory-Hu tree algorithms, we also solve the (1+є)-approximate all pairs mincut and single source mincut problems in the same time bounds. (These problems are simpler in that the goal is to only return the s−t mincut values, and not the mincuts.) This improves on the recent algorithm for these problems in Õ(n2) time due to Abboud et al. (FOCS 2020).","PeriodicalId":132752,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approximate Gomory–Hu tree is faster than n – 1 max-flows\",\"authors\":\"Jason Li, Debmalya Panigrahi\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3406325.3451112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Gomory-Hu tree or cut tree (Gomory and Hu, 1961) is a classic data structure for reporting s−t mincuts (and by duality, the values of s−t maxflows) for all pairs of vertices s and t in an undirected graph. Gomory and Hu showed that it can be computed using n−1 exact maxflow computations. Surprisingly, this remains the best algorithm for Gomory-Hu trees more than 50 years later, even for approximate mincuts. In this paper, we break this longstanding barrier and give an algorithm for computing a (1+є)-approximate Gomory-Hu tree using log(n) maxflow computations. Specifically, we obtain the runtime bounds we describe below. We obtain a randomized (Monte Carlo) algorithm for undirected, weighted graphs that runs in Õ(m + n3/2) time and returns a (1+є)-approximate Gomory-Hu tree algorithm whp. Previously, the best running time known was Õ(n5/2), which is obtained by running Gomory and Hu’s original algorithm on a cut sparsifier of the graph. Next, we obtain a randomized (Monte Carlo) algorithm for undirected, unweighted graphs that runs in m4/3+o(1) time and returns a (1+є)-approximate Gomory-Hu tree algorithm whp. This improves on our first result for sparse graphs, namely m = o(n9/8). Previously, the best running time known for unweighted graphs was Õ(mn) for an exact Gomory-Hu tree (Bhalgat et al., STOC 2007); no better result was known if approximations are allowed. As a consequence of our Gomory-Hu tree algorithms, we also solve the (1+є)-approximate all pairs mincut and single source mincut problems in the same time bounds. (These problems are simpler in that the goal is to only return the s−t mincut values, and not the mincuts.) This improves on the recent algorithm for these problems in Õ(n2) time due to Abboud et al. (FOCS 2020).\",\"PeriodicalId\":132752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3406325.3451112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3406325.3451112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

Gomory-Hu树或切树(Gomory and Hu, 1961)是一种经典的数据结构,用于报告无向图中所有对顶点s和t的s - t最小切(以及对偶性,s - t maxflows的值)。Gomory和Hu表明,它可以用n−1精确的maxflow计算来计算。令人惊讶的是,50多年后,这仍然是Gomory-Hu树的最佳算法,即使是近似的最小切。在本文中,我们打破了这个长期存在的障碍,并给出了一个使用log(n) maxflow计算计算(1+ n) -近似Gomory-Hu树的算法。具体来说,我们将获得下面描述的运行时边界。我们获得了一种随机(蒙特卡罗)算法,用于无向加权图,该算法运行在Õ(m + n2 /2)时间内,并返回(1+ n)-近似gomori - hu树算法whp。在此之前,已知的最佳运行时间为Õ(n5/2),这是通过在图的切割稀疏器上运行Gomory和Hu的原始算法得到的。接下来,我们获得了一种随机化(蒙特卡罗)算法,用于无向、无加权的图,该算法在m4/3+o(1)时间内运行,并返回(1+ k)-近似gomori - hu树算法whp。这改进了我们对稀疏图的第一个结果,即m = o(n1 /8)。以前,对于精确的Gomory-Hu树,已知的未加权图的最佳运行时间为Õ(mn) (Bhalgat et al., STOC 2007);如果允许近似值,没有更好的结果。由于我们的Gomory-Hu树算法,我们还在同一时间范围内解决了(1+ n)-近似的所有对最小切和单源最小切问题。(这些问题更简单,因为目标是只返回s−t最小切值,而不是最小切值。)这改进了Abboud等人(FOCS 2020)在Õ(n2)时间内解决这些问题的最新算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Approximate Gomory–Hu tree is faster than n – 1 max-flows
The Gomory-Hu tree or cut tree (Gomory and Hu, 1961) is a classic data structure for reporting s−t mincuts (and by duality, the values of s−t maxflows) for all pairs of vertices s and t in an undirected graph. Gomory and Hu showed that it can be computed using n−1 exact maxflow computations. Surprisingly, this remains the best algorithm for Gomory-Hu trees more than 50 years later, even for approximate mincuts. In this paper, we break this longstanding barrier and give an algorithm for computing a (1+є)-approximate Gomory-Hu tree using log(n) maxflow computations. Specifically, we obtain the runtime bounds we describe below. We obtain a randomized (Monte Carlo) algorithm for undirected, weighted graphs that runs in Õ(m + n3/2) time and returns a (1+є)-approximate Gomory-Hu tree algorithm whp. Previously, the best running time known was Õ(n5/2), which is obtained by running Gomory and Hu’s original algorithm on a cut sparsifier of the graph. Next, we obtain a randomized (Monte Carlo) algorithm for undirected, unweighted graphs that runs in m4/3+o(1) time and returns a (1+є)-approximate Gomory-Hu tree algorithm whp. This improves on our first result for sparse graphs, namely m = o(n9/8). Previously, the best running time known for unweighted graphs was Õ(mn) for an exact Gomory-Hu tree (Bhalgat et al., STOC 2007); no better result was known if approximations are allowed. As a consequence of our Gomory-Hu tree algorithms, we also solve the (1+є)-approximate all pairs mincut and single source mincut problems in the same time bounds. (These problems are simpler in that the goal is to only return the s−t mincut values, and not the mincuts.) This improves on the recent algorithm for these problems in Õ(n2) time due to Abboud et al. (FOCS 2020).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信