美国EMS 2050议程简介

William J Leggio
{"title":"美国EMS 2050议程简介","authors":"William J Leggio","doi":"10.32378/IJP.V3I2.169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Upon reflection over my past few years, thinking about the future is truly a unique experience. It allows for one to wander within the limits of your own creativity. It also potentially allows the stresses and fear of uncertainty to fester and experience the uncomfortable feelings of leaving what is known today. Ironically, the issues and conflicts we are experiencing today are somewhat comforting. Within the potentials of thinking about the future, is a real opportunity for a dialogue to envision a future and forming the guide to get there. This is essentially what a U.S. EMS Technical Expert Panel (TEP) of ten have done over the past two years. This letter is to introduce an overview of EMS Agenda 2050 as a spark for a global audience to reflect, think about their future of EMS, and engage in their own dialogue. In short, EMS Agenda 2050 is a guiding document for U. S. EMS, which was federally funded and supported. It follows the original 1996 federal document Emergency Medical Services for the Future, which was tasked with crafting a vision for U.S. EMS. Generally speaking, the Agenda 2050 process had two goals beyond articulating a vision. It was to be heavily influenced by the EMS profession and was to be a unifying document. Two strawman documents were used to spark thought, reaction, and feedback. Four in-person regional meetings were held utilizing a world café format with probing questions to facilitate dialogue and capture input. Smaller sessions were held at national and state conferences. Digital initiatives were launched with the assistance from national EMS organizations to submit feedback. National EMS organizations also designated liaisons to engage in the Agenda 2050 process. Captured feedback was continuously reviewed by the TEP throughout the process. EMS Agenda 2050 formed around a central value of being people centered. The word people was intentionally used with a broad and inclusive context in mind. This allowed for the document to be formed around a vision that was not limited to being patient, provider, or community centered. The value helped to form six guiding principles: Inherently Safe and Effective, Integrated and Seamless, Reliable and Prepared, Socially Equitable, Sustained and Efficient, and Adaptive and Innovative. The principles were not presented in a particular order of importance. All of the guiding principles formed with a people centered mindset and were rooted in feedback and professional passion. Inherently safe and effective focused on all systems of EMS embracing a culture of safety with practices that reduce harm and yield good outcomes. All of which support meaningful technology and policies that reduce safety risks in EMS. Integrated and seamless described strengthening the bridge between EMS and healthcare services and systems beyond just the local ER. Included, a more collaborative system of medical oversight and network of resources, professionals, and partners in public safety to deliver care and preparedness. Reliable and prepared in EMS set a vision for adequately staffed by a compensated workforce that is holistically well cared for. Another component articulated a need to reduce variability amongst EMS systems, shifts, and communities in order to provide more consistent evidenced based care. The socially equitable principle advocated how the setting where an individual receives care ought to have a minimal impact on the quality of care provided and their outcomes. All demographics and patient profiles ought to receive consistent high-quality care. Sustainable and efficient defined EMS as an essential service with allocated resources based on needs, system design, and improving patient outcomes. Adaptable OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE","PeriodicalId":367364,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Paramedicine","volume":"226 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to U.S. EMS Agenda 2050\",\"authors\":\"William J Leggio\",\"doi\":\"10.32378/IJP.V3I2.169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Upon reflection over my past few years, thinking about the future is truly a unique experience. It allows for one to wander within the limits of your own creativity. It also potentially allows the stresses and fear of uncertainty to fester and experience the uncomfortable feelings of leaving what is known today. Ironically, the issues and conflicts we are experiencing today are somewhat comforting. Within the potentials of thinking about the future, is a real opportunity for a dialogue to envision a future and forming the guide to get there. This is essentially what a U.S. EMS Technical Expert Panel (TEP) of ten have done over the past two years. This letter is to introduce an overview of EMS Agenda 2050 as a spark for a global audience to reflect, think about their future of EMS, and engage in their own dialogue. In short, EMS Agenda 2050 is a guiding document for U. S. EMS, which was federally funded and supported. It follows the original 1996 federal document Emergency Medical Services for the Future, which was tasked with crafting a vision for U.S. EMS. Generally speaking, the Agenda 2050 process had two goals beyond articulating a vision. It was to be heavily influenced by the EMS profession and was to be a unifying document. Two strawman documents were used to spark thought, reaction, and feedback. Four in-person regional meetings were held utilizing a world café format with probing questions to facilitate dialogue and capture input. Smaller sessions were held at national and state conferences. Digital initiatives were launched with the assistance from national EMS organizations to submit feedback. National EMS organizations also designated liaisons to engage in the Agenda 2050 process. Captured feedback was continuously reviewed by the TEP throughout the process. EMS Agenda 2050 formed around a central value of being people centered. The word people was intentionally used with a broad and inclusive context in mind. This allowed for the document to be formed around a vision that was not limited to being patient, provider, or community centered. The value helped to form six guiding principles: Inherently Safe and Effective, Integrated and Seamless, Reliable and Prepared, Socially Equitable, Sustained and Efficient, and Adaptive and Innovative. The principles were not presented in a particular order of importance. All of the guiding principles formed with a people centered mindset and were rooted in feedback and professional passion. Inherently safe and effective focused on all systems of EMS embracing a culture of safety with practices that reduce harm and yield good outcomes. All of which support meaningful technology and policies that reduce safety risks in EMS. Integrated and seamless described strengthening the bridge between EMS and healthcare services and systems beyond just the local ER. Included, a more collaborative system of medical oversight and network of resources, professionals, and partners in public safety to deliver care and preparedness. Reliable and prepared in EMS set a vision for adequately staffed by a compensated workforce that is holistically well cared for. Another component articulated a need to reduce variability amongst EMS systems, shifts, and communities in order to provide more consistent evidenced based care. The socially equitable principle advocated how the setting where an individual receives care ought to have a minimal impact on the quality of care provided and their outcomes. All demographics and patient profiles ought to receive consistent high-quality care. Sustainable and efficient defined EMS as an essential service with allocated resources based on needs, system design, and improving patient outcomes. Adaptable OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE\",\"PeriodicalId\":367364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Journal of Paramedicine\",\"volume\":\"226 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Journal of Paramedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32378/IJP.V3I2.169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32378/IJP.V3I2.169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

回顾过去的几年,思考未来确实是一种独特的经历。它允许一个人在自己的创造力范围内徘徊。它也可能让压力和对不确定性的恐惧恶化,并体验到离开今天已知的不舒服的感觉。具有讽刺意味的是,我们今天经历的问题和冲突在某种程度上是令人欣慰的。在思考未来的潜力中,是一个真正的机会,可以进行对话,设想未来,并形成实现未来的指南。这基本上是美国EMS技术专家小组(TEP)在过去两年中经常做的事情。这封信是为了介绍EMS议程2050的概述,以激发全球观众反思,思考他们对EMS的未来,并参与他们自己的对话。简而言之,EMS 2050议程是美国EMS的指导性文件,由联邦政府资助和支持。它遵循1996年最初的联邦文件《未来紧急医疗服务》,该文件的任务是制定美国紧急医疗服务的愿景。总的来说,2050年议程进程除了阐明愿景之外还有两个目标。它将受到EMS专业的严重影响,并将成为一个统一的文件。两个稻草人文档被用来激发思考、反应和反馈。举行了四次面对面区域会议,采用世界caf形式,提出探索性问题,以促进对话和获取投入。在国家和州会议上举行了较小的会议。在国家EMS组织的协助下,启动了数字倡议,以提交反馈。国家环境管理系统组织还指定联络员参与2050年议程进程。在整个过程中,TEP不断地审查捕获的反馈。EMS 2050议程围绕以人为本的核心价值观形成。“人”这个词被有意地用在一个广泛而包容的语境中。这使得文档可以围绕一个愿景而形成,而不局限于以病人、提供者或社区为中心。这一价值有助于形成六项指导原则:本质安全和有效、综合和无缝、可靠和准备、社会公平、持续和高效、适应性和创新。这些原则并没有按照重要程度的先后次序提出。所有的指导原则都是以人为本的心态形成的,并植根于反馈和专业热情。本质上安全和有效的重点是EMS的所有系统,包括安全文化,减少伤害和产生良好的结果。所有这些都支持有意义的技术和政策,以降低EMS的安全风险。集成和无缝描述了加强EMS与医疗保健服务和系统之间的桥梁,而不仅仅是本地急诊室。包括建立一个更具协作性的医疗监督系统和资源、专业人员和公共安全合作伙伴网络,以提供护理和准备。可靠和准备的EMS设定了一个愿景,充分配备一个全面照顾的有偿劳动力。另一个组成部分阐述了需要减少EMS系统、班次和社区之间的差异,以便提供更一致的循证护理。社会公平原则主张个人接受护理的环境应该如何对所提供护理的质量及其结果产生最小的影响。所有人口统计数据和患者资料都应该得到一致的高质量护理。可持续和高效地将EMS定义为一种基本服务,其资源分配基于需求、系统设计和改善患者预后。适应性强的开放获取文章
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction to U.S. EMS Agenda 2050
Upon reflection over my past few years, thinking about the future is truly a unique experience. It allows for one to wander within the limits of your own creativity. It also potentially allows the stresses and fear of uncertainty to fester and experience the uncomfortable feelings of leaving what is known today. Ironically, the issues and conflicts we are experiencing today are somewhat comforting. Within the potentials of thinking about the future, is a real opportunity for a dialogue to envision a future and forming the guide to get there. This is essentially what a U.S. EMS Technical Expert Panel (TEP) of ten have done over the past two years. This letter is to introduce an overview of EMS Agenda 2050 as a spark for a global audience to reflect, think about their future of EMS, and engage in their own dialogue. In short, EMS Agenda 2050 is a guiding document for U. S. EMS, which was federally funded and supported. It follows the original 1996 federal document Emergency Medical Services for the Future, which was tasked with crafting a vision for U.S. EMS. Generally speaking, the Agenda 2050 process had two goals beyond articulating a vision. It was to be heavily influenced by the EMS profession and was to be a unifying document. Two strawman documents were used to spark thought, reaction, and feedback. Four in-person regional meetings were held utilizing a world café format with probing questions to facilitate dialogue and capture input. Smaller sessions were held at national and state conferences. Digital initiatives were launched with the assistance from national EMS organizations to submit feedback. National EMS organizations also designated liaisons to engage in the Agenda 2050 process. Captured feedback was continuously reviewed by the TEP throughout the process. EMS Agenda 2050 formed around a central value of being people centered. The word people was intentionally used with a broad and inclusive context in mind. This allowed for the document to be formed around a vision that was not limited to being patient, provider, or community centered. The value helped to form six guiding principles: Inherently Safe and Effective, Integrated and Seamless, Reliable and Prepared, Socially Equitable, Sustained and Efficient, and Adaptive and Innovative. The principles were not presented in a particular order of importance. All of the guiding principles formed with a people centered mindset and were rooted in feedback and professional passion. Inherently safe and effective focused on all systems of EMS embracing a culture of safety with practices that reduce harm and yield good outcomes. All of which support meaningful technology and policies that reduce safety risks in EMS. Integrated and seamless described strengthening the bridge between EMS and healthcare services and systems beyond just the local ER. Included, a more collaborative system of medical oversight and network of resources, professionals, and partners in public safety to deliver care and preparedness. Reliable and prepared in EMS set a vision for adequately staffed by a compensated workforce that is holistically well cared for. Another component articulated a need to reduce variability amongst EMS systems, shifts, and communities in order to provide more consistent evidenced based care. The socially equitable principle advocated how the setting where an individual receives care ought to have a minimal impact on the quality of care provided and their outcomes. All demographics and patient profiles ought to receive consistent high-quality care. Sustainable and efficient defined EMS as an essential service with allocated resources based on needs, system design, and improving patient outcomes. Adaptable OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信