优雅地表达问题

A. Black
{"title":"优雅地表达问题","authors":"A. Black","doi":"10.1145/2786555.2786556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The \"Expression Problem\" was brought to prominence by Wadler in 1998. It is widely regarded as illustrating that the two mainstream approaches to data abstraction---procedural abstraction and type abstraction---are complementary, with the strengths of one being the weaknesses of the other. Despite an extensive literature, the origin of the problem remains ill-understood. I show that the core problem is in fact the use of global constants, and demonstrate that an important aspect of the problem goes away when Java is replaced by a language like Grace, which eliminates them.","PeriodicalId":132077,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the MechAnisms on SPEcialization, Generalization and inHerItance","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Expression Problem, Gracefully\",\"authors\":\"A. Black\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2786555.2786556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The \\\"Expression Problem\\\" was brought to prominence by Wadler in 1998. It is widely regarded as illustrating that the two mainstream approaches to data abstraction---procedural abstraction and type abstraction---are complementary, with the strengths of one being the weaknesses of the other. Despite an extensive literature, the origin of the problem remains ill-understood. I show that the core problem is in fact the use of global constants, and demonstrate that an important aspect of the problem goes away when Java is replaced by a language like Grace, which eliminates them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the MechAnisms on SPEcialization, Generalization and inHerItance\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the MechAnisms on SPEcialization, Generalization and inHerItance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2786555.2786556\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the MechAnisms on SPEcialization, Generalization and inHerItance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2786555.2786556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

“表达问题”在1998年由瓦德勒提出。它被广泛认为说明了数据抽象的两种主流方法——过程抽象和类型抽象——是互补的,一种方法的优点是另一种方法的缺点。尽管有大量的文献,但这个问题的起源仍然不清楚。我展示了核心问题实际上是全局常量的使用,并演示了当Java被像Grace这样的语言取代时,问题的一个重要方面就消失了,因为它消除了全局常量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Expression Problem, Gracefully
The "Expression Problem" was brought to prominence by Wadler in 1998. It is widely regarded as illustrating that the two mainstream approaches to data abstraction---procedural abstraction and type abstraction---are complementary, with the strengths of one being the weaknesses of the other. Despite an extensive literature, the origin of the problem remains ill-understood. I show that the core problem is in fact the use of global constants, and demonstrate that an important aspect of the problem goes away when Java is replaced by a language like Grace, which eliminates them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信