{"title":"光学透明增强现实中遮挡物对近场深度匹配的影响","authors":"Chunya Hua, Kenneth R. Moser, J. Swan","doi":"10.1109/VR.2014.6802095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have conducted an experiment to study the effect of an occluding surface on the accuracy of near field depth matching in augmented reality (AR). Our experiment was based on replicating a similar experiment conducted by Edwards et al. [2]. We used an AR haploscope [1], which allows us to independently manipulate accommodative demand and vergence angle of the visible image. Fifteen observers matched the perceived depth of an AR-presented virtual object with a physical pointer. Overall, observers overestimated depth by 5 mm or less in the presence of the occluder, while in the absence of an occluder they overestimated depth by 5 to 10 mm. The data from Edwards et al. [2] is normalized, and when we performed the same normalization procedure on our own data, our results do not agree with Edwards et al. [2]. We suspect that eye vergence explains these results.","PeriodicalId":408559,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR)","volume":"2672 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of an occluder on near field depth matching in optical see-through augmented reality\",\"authors\":\"Chunya Hua, Kenneth R. Moser, J. Swan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VR.2014.6802095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We have conducted an experiment to study the effect of an occluding surface on the accuracy of near field depth matching in augmented reality (AR). Our experiment was based on replicating a similar experiment conducted by Edwards et al. [2]. We used an AR haploscope [1], which allows us to independently manipulate accommodative demand and vergence angle of the visible image. Fifteen observers matched the perceived depth of an AR-presented virtual object with a physical pointer. Overall, observers overestimated depth by 5 mm or less in the presence of the occluder, while in the absence of an occluder they overestimated depth by 5 to 10 mm. The data from Edwards et al. [2] is normalized, and when we performed the same normalization procedure on our own data, our results do not agree with Edwards et al. [2]. We suspect that eye vergence explains these results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR)\",\"volume\":\"2672 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2014.6802095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2014.6802095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effect of an occluder on near field depth matching in optical see-through augmented reality
We have conducted an experiment to study the effect of an occluding surface on the accuracy of near field depth matching in augmented reality (AR). Our experiment was based on replicating a similar experiment conducted by Edwards et al. [2]. We used an AR haploscope [1], which allows us to independently manipulate accommodative demand and vergence angle of the visible image. Fifteen observers matched the perceived depth of an AR-presented virtual object with a physical pointer. Overall, observers overestimated depth by 5 mm or less in the presence of the occluder, while in the absence of an occluder they overestimated depth by 5 to 10 mm. The data from Edwards et al. [2] is normalized, and when we performed the same normalization procedure on our own data, our results do not agree with Edwards et al. [2]. We suspect that eye vergence explains these results.