用本体形式化体系结构规则——一种工业评价

Sandra Schröder, Georg Buchgeher
{"title":"用本体形式化体系结构规则——一种工业评价","authors":"Sandra Schröder, Georg Buchgeher","doi":"10.1109/APSEC48747.2019.00017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Architecture conformance checking is an important means for quality control to assess that the system implementation adheres to its defined software architecture. Ideally, this process is automated to support continuous quality control. Many different approaches exist for automated conformance checking. However, these approaches are often limited in terms of supported concepts for describing and analyzing software architectures. We have developed an ontology-based approach that seeks to overcome the limited expressiveness of existing approaches. As a frontend of the formalism, we provide a Controlled Natural Language. In this paper, we present an industrial validation of the approach. For this, we collected architectural rules from three industrial projects. In total, we discovered 56 architectural rules in the projects. We successfully formalized 80% of those architectural rules. Additionally, we discussed the formalization with the corresponding software architect of each project. We found that the original intention of each architectural rule is properly reflected in the formalization. The results of the study show that projects could greatly benefit from applying an ontology-based approach, since it helps to precisely define and preserve concepts throughout the development process.","PeriodicalId":325642,"journal":{"name":"2019 26th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formalizing Architectural Rules with Ontologies - An Industrial Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Schröder, Georg Buchgeher\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APSEC48747.2019.00017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Architecture conformance checking is an important means for quality control to assess that the system implementation adheres to its defined software architecture. Ideally, this process is automated to support continuous quality control. Many different approaches exist for automated conformance checking. However, these approaches are often limited in terms of supported concepts for describing and analyzing software architectures. We have developed an ontology-based approach that seeks to overcome the limited expressiveness of existing approaches. As a frontend of the formalism, we provide a Controlled Natural Language. In this paper, we present an industrial validation of the approach. For this, we collected architectural rules from three industrial projects. In total, we discovered 56 architectural rules in the projects. We successfully formalized 80% of those architectural rules. Additionally, we discussed the formalization with the corresponding software architect of each project. We found that the original intention of each architectural rule is properly reflected in the formalization. The results of the study show that projects could greatly benefit from applying an ontology-based approach, since it helps to precisely define and preserve concepts throughout the development process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 26th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 26th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC48747.2019.00017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 26th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC48747.2019.00017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

体系结构一致性检查是质量控制评估系统实现是否符合其定义的软件体系结构的重要手段。理想情况下,这个过程是自动化的,以支持持续的质量控制。存在许多不同的自动化一致性检查方法。然而,这些方法在描述和分析软件架构所支持的概念方面经常受到限制。我们开发了一种基于本体的方法,旨在克服现有方法的有限表达性。作为形式主义的前端,我们提供了一种受控的自然语言。在本文中,我们提出了该方法的工业验证。为此,我们从三个工业项目中收集了建筑规则。总的来说,我们在项目中发现了56条建筑规则。我们成功地形式化了80%的架构规则。此外,我们还与每个项目的相应软件架构师讨论了形式化。我们发现,每条架构规则的初衷都在形式化中得到了恰当的体现。研究结果表明,项目可以从应用基于本体的方法中获益,因为它有助于在整个开发过程中精确地定义和保存概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formalizing Architectural Rules with Ontologies - An Industrial Evaluation
Architecture conformance checking is an important means for quality control to assess that the system implementation adheres to its defined software architecture. Ideally, this process is automated to support continuous quality control. Many different approaches exist for automated conformance checking. However, these approaches are often limited in terms of supported concepts for describing and analyzing software architectures. We have developed an ontology-based approach that seeks to overcome the limited expressiveness of existing approaches. As a frontend of the formalism, we provide a Controlled Natural Language. In this paper, we present an industrial validation of the approach. For this, we collected architectural rules from three industrial projects. In total, we discovered 56 architectural rules in the projects. We successfully formalized 80% of those architectural rules. Additionally, we discussed the formalization with the corresponding software architect of each project. We found that the original intention of each architectural rule is properly reflected in the formalization. The results of the study show that projects could greatly benefit from applying an ontology-based approach, since it helps to precisely define and preserve concepts throughout the development process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信