反馈质量指数的开发和现场预测试:在临床环境中评估反馈频率和质量的工具

Michael Fitzgerald, C. Lehmann
{"title":"反馈质量指数的开发和现场预测试:在临床环境中评估反馈频率和质量的工具","authors":"Michael Fitzgerald, C. Lehmann","doi":"10.2174/1876519X01104010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This paper describes the systematic development, design, and field pretest of the Feedback Quality Index (FQI) - a brief survey for assessing feedback regularity and quality in a clinical setting. Medical educators need this type of tool so they can identify specific problems related to feedback provision and evaluate the impact of efforts de- signed to address those problems. The purposes of this study are to provide evidence for the feasibility and validity of the tool and to provide guidance and suggestions regarding its use. Methods: Decisions regarding the design and implementation of the FQI were guided by a systematic approach to survey development to ensure that common sources of non-sampling error were identified and addressed. A field pretest imple- mentation was conducted to gather evidence regarding the feasibility of the tool and the validity of the data. Feasibility was assessed based on the effort needed to administer, complete, and analyze the FQI while evidence for validity was based on an analysis of question quality. Results: Field pretest results indicated that the FQI can be feasibly administered, completed, and analyzed. An analysis of question quality revealed that most questions were understood correctly by respondents and the level of detail they pro- vide in describing the feedback received provides evidence for the accuracy of their recollections. Conclusions: The current version of the FQI is a useful tool that programs could use to assess feedback frequency and quality, identify specific problems, and evaluate efforts to address those problems. Additional studies need to be con- ducted to further assess and improve the validity of the FQI. Such efforts will not only improve the accuracy of the FQI but could also enhance our conceptual understanding of what constitutes effective feedback in the clinical setting.","PeriodicalId":304672,"journal":{"name":"The Open Medical Education Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Field Pretest of the Feedback Quality Index: A Tool for Assessing Feedback Frequency and Quality in a Clinical Setting\",\"authors\":\"Michael Fitzgerald, C. Lehmann\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1876519X01104010001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: This paper describes the systematic development, design, and field pretest of the Feedback Quality Index (FQI) - a brief survey for assessing feedback regularity and quality in a clinical setting. Medical educators need this type of tool so they can identify specific problems related to feedback provision and evaluate the impact of efforts de- signed to address those problems. The purposes of this study are to provide evidence for the feasibility and validity of the tool and to provide guidance and suggestions regarding its use. Methods: Decisions regarding the design and implementation of the FQI were guided by a systematic approach to survey development to ensure that common sources of non-sampling error were identified and addressed. A field pretest imple- mentation was conducted to gather evidence regarding the feasibility of the tool and the validity of the data. Feasibility was assessed based on the effort needed to administer, complete, and analyze the FQI while evidence for validity was based on an analysis of question quality. Results: Field pretest results indicated that the FQI can be feasibly administered, completed, and analyzed. An analysis of question quality revealed that most questions were understood correctly by respondents and the level of detail they pro- vide in describing the feedback received provides evidence for the accuracy of their recollections. Conclusions: The current version of the FQI is a useful tool that programs could use to assess feedback frequency and quality, identify specific problems, and evaluate efforts to address those problems. Additional studies need to be con- ducted to further assess and improve the validity of the FQI. Such efforts will not only improve the accuracy of the FQI but could also enhance our conceptual understanding of what constitutes effective feedback in the clinical setting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":304672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Medical Education Journal\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Medical Education Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876519X01104010001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Medical Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876519X01104010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本文描述了反馈质量指数(FQI)的系统开发,设计和现场预测试-一种在临床环境中评估反馈规律和质量的简要调查。医学教育工作者需要这种类型的工具,以便他们能够识别与反馈提供相关的具体问题,并评估为解决这些问题而设计的努力的影响。本研究的目的是为该工具的可行性和有效性提供证据,并就其使用提供指导和建议。方法:关于FQI的设计和实施的决定是由一种系统的调查开发方法指导的,以确保识别和解决非抽样误差的常见来源。进行了现场预测试实施,以收集有关该工具的可行性和数据有效性的证据。可行性评估基于管理、完成和分析FQI所需的努力,而有效性证据基于对问题质量的分析。结果:现场预试结果表明,FQI的实施、完成和分析是可行的。对问题质量的分析表明,大多数问题被受访者正确理解,他们在描述收到的反馈时提供的细节水平为他们回忆的准确性提供了证据。结论:当前版本的FQI是一个有用的工具,程序可以使用它来评估反馈的频率和质量,识别特定的问题,并评估解决这些问题的努力。需要进行更多的研究来进一步评估和提高FQI的有效性。这样的努力不仅可以提高FQI的准确性,还可以增强我们对临床环境中有效反馈的概念理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Field Pretest of the Feedback Quality Index: A Tool for Assessing Feedback Frequency and Quality in a Clinical Setting
Objectives: This paper describes the systematic development, design, and field pretest of the Feedback Quality Index (FQI) - a brief survey for assessing feedback regularity and quality in a clinical setting. Medical educators need this type of tool so they can identify specific problems related to feedback provision and evaluate the impact of efforts de- signed to address those problems. The purposes of this study are to provide evidence for the feasibility and validity of the tool and to provide guidance and suggestions regarding its use. Methods: Decisions regarding the design and implementation of the FQI were guided by a systematic approach to survey development to ensure that common sources of non-sampling error were identified and addressed. A field pretest imple- mentation was conducted to gather evidence regarding the feasibility of the tool and the validity of the data. Feasibility was assessed based on the effort needed to administer, complete, and analyze the FQI while evidence for validity was based on an analysis of question quality. Results: Field pretest results indicated that the FQI can be feasibly administered, completed, and analyzed. An analysis of question quality revealed that most questions were understood correctly by respondents and the level of detail they pro- vide in describing the feedback received provides evidence for the accuracy of their recollections. Conclusions: The current version of the FQI is a useful tool that programs could use to assess feedback frequency and quality, identify specific problems, and evaluate efforts to address those problems. Additional studies need to be con- ducted to further assess and improve the validity of the FQI. Such efforts will not only improve the accuracy of the FQI but could also enhance our conceptual understanding of what constitutes effective feedback in the clinical setting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信