旋转冲击工具参数优化及试验评价研究

Tu Yulin, Bodong Li, G. Zhan, R. Rached, Eduardo Gramajo
{"title":"旋转冲击工具参数优化及试验评价研究","authors":"Tu Yulin, Bodong Li, G. Zhan, R. Rached, Eduardo Gramajo","doi":"10.2523/iptc-23005-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Drilling in hard and abrasive formation represents a major challenge due to the low rate of penetration (ROP). Rotary percussive drilling tools take advantage of both the shear action of drill bit cutters and axial percussion energy to increase the drilling efficiency. Such tools have shown a significant benefit in drilling efficiency enhancement, especially in air drilling with an air hammer. This study focuses on a fluid-type rotary percussive drilling tool development and application to address the significant drilling challenge in drilling hard and highly abrasive sandstone formations. A rock mechanical study is carried out to get the compressive strength and the internal friction of the hard and abrasive formation. Then, a 6-3/4 inch rotary percussive tool is designed and optimized based on a relationship between rock mechanics and the output energy and frequency of the tool. Next, the tool was thoroughly tested in the workshop, and the key parameters were acquired and compared with the design.\n The tool was trial tested in a hard and abrasive formation dominated by fine sandstone and siltstone in the upper section and a softer formation below. The new 6-3/4 inch tool was run in the test well and drilled DV tools, cement, float collar, and float shoe, then penetrated the hard and abrasive formation. The hammer drilled 912ft with an ROP of 10.5 ft/h with a pure drilling time of 87 hours. The ROP increase is around 30% for the same depth and formation with less WOB and RPM. Drilling efficiency was increased in the top section with less WOB and RPM compared with the same formation and depth of an offset well section drilled with hybrid bits. The differences of the wells in the hard abrasive formation thickness, bit type, BHA, bits dull grading, and RPM are studied. The tool performance evaluation and lessons learned from optimization and trial tests are summarized. The future direction of this work is also discussed.","PeriodicalId":185347,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Fri, March 03, 2023","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on Rotary Percussion Tool Parameters Optimization and Trial Test Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Tu Yulin, Bodong Li, G. Zhan, R. Rached, Eduardo Gramajo\",\"doi\":\"10.2523/iptc-23005-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Drilling in hard and abrasive formation represents a major challenge due to the low rate of penetration (ROP). Rotary percussive drilling tools take advantage of both the shear action of drill bit cutters and axial percussion energy to increase the drilling efficiency. Such tools have shown a significant benefit in drilling efficiency enhancement, especially in air drilling with an air hammer. This study focuses on a fluid-type rotary percussive drilling tool development and application to address the significant drilling challenge in drilling hard and highly abrasive sandstone formations. A rock mechanical study is carried out to get the compressive strength and the internal friction of the hard and abrasive formation. Then, a 6-3/4 inch rotary percussive tool is designed and optimized based on a relationship between rock mechanics and the output energy and frequency of the tool. Next, the tool was thoroughly tested in the workshop, and the key parameters were acquired and compared with the design.\\n The tool was trial tested in a hard and abrasive formation dominated by fine sandstone and siltstone in the upper section and a softer formation below. The new 6-3/4 inch tool was run in the test well and drilled DV tools, cement, float collar, and float shoe, then penetrated the hard and abrasive formation. The hammer drilled 912ft with an ROP of 10.5 ft/h with a pure drilling time of 87 hours. The ROP increase is around 30% for the same depth and formation with less WOB and RPM. Drilling efficiency was increased in the top section with less WOB and RPM compared with the same formation and depth of an offset well section drilled with hybrid bits. The differences of the wells in the hard abrasive formation thickness, bit type, BHA, bits dull grading, and RPM are studied. The tool performance evaluation and lessons learned from optimization and trial tests are summarized. The future direction of this work is also discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Fri, March 03, 2023\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Fri, March 03, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-23005-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Fri, March 03, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-23005-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于机械钻速(ROP)较低,在坚硬和磨蚀性地层中钻井是一个主要挑战。旋转冲击钻具利用了钻头切削齿的剪切作用和轴向冲击能量,提高了钻井效率。这些工具在提高钻井效率方面表现出了显著的优势,特别是在使用气锤进行空气钻井时。本研究的重点是流体型旋转冲击钻井工具的开发和应用,以解决在坚硬和高磨蚀性砂岩地层钻井的重大钻井挑战。对岩石力学进行了研究,得到了硬磨料地层的抗压强度和内耗。然后,根据岩石力学与工具输出能量和频率之间的关系,设计并优化了6-3/4英寸旋转冲击工具。其次,在车间对刀具进行了全面测试,获得了关键参数,并与设计进行了对比。该工具在上部以细砂岩和粉砂岩为主的硬磨蚀地层和下部较软的地层中进行了试验。新的6-3/4英寸工具在测试井中下入,钻入DV工具、水泥、浮子接箍和浮子鞋,然后穿透坚硬的磨蚀地层。锤子钻了912ft,机械钻速为10.5 ft/h,纯钻井时间为87小时。在相同的深度和地层中,ROP提高了30%左右,WOB和RPM更低。与使用混合钻头的邻井段相同的地层和深度相比,顶段的钻压和转速更低,钻井效率更高。研究了不同井在硬磨粒地层厚度、钻头类型、BHA、钻头磨粒分级、转速等方面的差异。总结了工具性能评价和优化试验的经验教训。并对今后的研究方向进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study on Rotary Percussion Tool Parameters Optimization and Trial Test Evaluation
Drilling in hard and abrasive formation represents a major challenge due to the low rate of penetration (ROP). Rotary percussive drilling tools take advantage of both the shear action of drill bit cutters and axial percussion energy to increase the drilling efficiency. Such tools have shown a significant benefit in drilling efficiency enhancement, especially in air drilling with an air hammer. This study focuses on a fluid-type rotary percussive drilling tool development and application to address the significant drilling challenge in drilling hard and highly abrasive sandstone formations. A rock mechanical study is carried out to get the compressive strength and the internal friction of the hard and abrasive formation. Then, a 6-3/4 inch rotary percussive tool is designed and optimized based on a relationship between rock mechanics and the output energy and frequency of the tool. Next, the tool was thoroughly tested in the workshop, and the key parameters were acquired and compared with the design. The tool was trial tested in a hard and abrasive formation dominated by fine sandstone and siltstone in the upper section and a softer formation below. The new 6-3/4 inch tool was run in the test well and drilled DV tools, cement, float collar, and float shoe, then penetrated the hard and abrasive formation. The hammer drilled 912ft with an ROP of 10.5 ft/h with a pure drilling time of 87 hours. The ROP increase is around 30% for the same depth and formation with less WOB and RPM. Drilling efficiency was increased in the top section with less WOB and RPM compared with the same formation and depth of an offset well section drilled with hybrid bits. The differences of the wells in the hard abrasive formation thickness, bit type, BHA, bits dull grading, and RPM are studied. The tool performance evaluation and lessons learned from optimization and trial tests are summarized. The future direction of this work is also discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信