工作的终结

T. Kippenberger
{"title":"工作的终结","authors":"T. Kippenberger","doi":"10.1108/EUM0000000006770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Submits that ‘dejobbing’ has occurred because of a variety of factors — which are listed out — but new technology is causing shifts in part‐time and temporary work and away from permanent employment. Believes technological advances have already affected business practices and that workers no longer have jobs but ‘do’ jobs and may have many employers in their working lifetime, rather than having a job for life as in the past. Concludes that companies will need to learn how to redeploy staff when they are superfluous to various areas.","PeriodicalId":178456,"journal":{"name":"The Antidote","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The end of jobs\",\"authors\":\"T. Kippenberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/EUM0000000006770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Submits that ‘dejobbing’ has occurred because of a variety of factors — which are listed out — but new technology is causing shifts in part‐time and temporary work and away from permanent employment. Believes technological advances have already affected business practices and that workers no longer have jobs but ‘do’ jobs and may have many employers in their working lifetime, rather than having a job for life as in the past. Concludes that companies will need to learn how to redeploy staff when they are superfluous to various areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Antidote\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Antidote\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006770\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Antidote","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

他提出,“去工作”的发生是由于各种各样的因素,但新技术正在导致兼职和临时工作的转变,而不是长期就业。认为技术进步已经影响了商业实践,工人不再有工作,而是“做”工作,在他们的工作生涯中可能会有很多雇主,而不是像过去那样终身工作。结论是,公司需要学会如何在员工在不同领域是多余的时候重新部署他们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The end of jobs
Submits that ‘dejobbing’ has occurred because of a variety of factors — which are listed out — but new technology is causing shifts in part‐time and temporary work and away from permanent employment. Believes technological advances have already affected business practices and that workers no longer have jobs but ‘do’ jobs and may have many employers in their working lifetime, rather than having a job for life as in the past. Concludes that companies will need to learn how to redeploy staff when they are superfluous to various areas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信