肩关节置换术中的技术创新:规划软件如何工作?

Q4 Medicine
Jessica L. Churchill MD, Vahid Entezari MD, MMSc, Jason C. Ho MD, Joseph P. Iannotti MD, PhD, Eric T. Ricchetti MD
{"title":"肩关节置换术中的技术创新:规划软件如何工作?","authors":"Jessica L. Churchill MD,&nbsp;Vahid Entezari MD, MMSc,&nbsp;Jason C. Ho MD,&nbsp;Joseph P. Iannotti MD, PhD,&nbsp;Eric T. Ricchetti MD","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2023.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Both anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty<span> and reverse shoulder arthroplasty<span> have seen increasing utilization over the last 20 years. Malpositioned components present a significant risk for loosening and failure in both total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty . Preoperative planning with three-dimensional computed tomography<span><span> imaging and virtual implant templating can help surgeons determine optimal implant position and has been shown to provide superior accuracy over standard 2D computed tomography imaging without virtual templating. Surgeons can use preoperative planning software to evaluate complex cases of glenoid bone loss or deformity requiring </span>bone grafts or augmented implants to determine what surgical correction and techniques are necessary to achieve the goals of </span></span></span></span>implant placement. While the development of preoperative planning software represents a technological advancement, it is important for surgeons to understand that variations can exist between different commercially available software programs in their methods of bony segmentation and landmark placement, which can lead to some differences in the measurement of pathology. This article will review how this technology is utilized to better understand preoperative bony deformity and optimize implant positioning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 846-856"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technological innovations in shoulder arthroplasty: how does planning software work?\",\"authors\":\"Jessica L. Churchill MD,&nbsp;Vahid Entezari MD, MMSc,&nbsp;Jason C. Ho MD,&nbsp;Joseph P. Iannotti MD, PhD,&nbsp;Eric T. Ricchetti MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.sart.2023.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Both anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty<span> and reverse shoulder arthroplasty<span> have seen increasing utilization over the last 20 years. Malpositioned components present a significant risk for loosening and failure in both total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty . Preoperative planning with three-dimensional computed tomography<span><span> imaging and virtual implant templating can help surgeons determine optimal implant position and has been shown to provide superior accuracy over standard 2D computed tomography imaging without virtual templating. Surgeons can use preoperative planning software to evaluate complex cases of glenoid bone loss or deformity requiring </span>bone grafts or augmented implants to determine what surgical correction and techniques are necessary to achieve the goals of </span></span></span></span>implant placement. While the development of preoperative planning software represents a technological advancement, it is important for surgeons to understand that variations can exist between different commercially available software programs in their methods of bony segmentation and landmark placement, which can lead to some differences in the measurement of pathology. This article will review how this technology is utilized to better understand preoperative bony deformity and optimize implant positioning.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\"33 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 846-856\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452723000652\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452723000652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

解剖性全肩关节置换术和反向肩关节置换术在过去20年中应用越来越广泛。在全肩关节置换术和反向肩关节置换术中,错位的假体存在明显的松动和失败风险。术前规划与三维计算机断层成像和虚拟种植模板可以帮助外科医生确定最佳种植体位置,并已被证明比标准的二维计算机断层成像没有虚拟模板提供更高的准确性。外科医生可以使用术前计划软件来评估需要骨移植或增强型植入物的盂骨丢失或畸形的复杂病例,以确定需要哪些手术矫正和技术来实现植入目标。虽然术前规划软件的发展代表了技术进步,但对于外科医生来说,重要的是要了解不同的商用软件程序在骨分割和地标放置方法上可能存在差异,这可能导致病理测量的一些差异。本文将回顾如何利用该技术更好地了解术前骨畸形和优化植入物定位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technological innovations in shoulder arthroplasty: how does planning software work?

Both anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty have seen increasing utilization over the last 20 years. Malpositioned components present a significant risk for loosening and failure in both total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty . Preoperative planning with three-dimensional computed tomography imaging and virtual implant templating can help surgeons determine optimal implant position and has been shown to provide superior accuracy over standard 2D computed tomography imaging without virtual templating. Surgeons can use preoperative planning software to evaluate complex cases of glenoid bone loss or deformity requiring bone grafts or augmented implants to determine what surgical correction and techniques are necessary to achieve the goals of implant placement. While the development of preoperative planning software represents a technological advancement, it is important for surgeons to understand that variations can exist between different commercially available software programs in their methods of bony segmentation and landmark placement, which can lead to some differences in the measurement of pathology. This article will review how this technology is utilized to better understand preoperative bony deformity and optimize implant positioning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Arthroplasty
Seminars in Arthroplasty Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信