有问题和持久的中学后课程表现先入为主的观念

S. Krishnamurthi, Anika Bahl, Benjamin Lee, S. Sloman
{"title":"有问题和持久的中学后课程表现先入为主的观念","authors":"S. Krishnamurthi, Anika Bahl, Benjamin Lee, S. Sloman","doi":"10.1145/3564721.3564722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Student conceptions about program “efficiency” shape their approach to programming and problem-solving. However, we know very little about the kinds of conceptions students have on entry into post-secondary education. In this paper we present the result of multiple iterations of a study where we ask students to rank programs on efficiency. We find students have several misconceptions across the iterations. We attempt to employ two standard techniques for puncturing people’s illusions of understanding, but both have only limited success: students have strongly-held opinions despite their frequent errors. Post-secondary education about program efficiency needs to take much more account of students’ pre-conceptions.","PeriodicalId":149708,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problematic and Persistent Post-Secondary Program Performance Preconceptions\",\"authors\":\"S. Krishnamurthi, Anika Bahl, Benjamin Lee, S. Sloman\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3564721.3564722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Student conceptions about program “efficiency” shape their approach to programming and problem-solving. However, we know very little about the kinds of conceptions students have on entry into post-secondary education. In this paper we present the result of multiple iterations of a study where we ask students to rank programs on efficiency. We find students have several misconceptions across the iterations. We attempt to employ two standard techniques for puncturing people’s illusions of understanding, but both have only limited success: students have strongly-held opinions despite their frequent errors. Post-secondary education about program efficiency needs to take much more account of students’ pre-conceptions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3564721.3564722\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3564721.3564722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

学生对程序“效率”的概念塑造了他们编程和解决问题的方法。然而,我们对学生进入高等教育的各种观念知之甚少。在这篇论文中,我们提出了一项研究的多次迭代的结果,我们要求学生对程序的效率进行排名。我们发现学生在迭代过程中有一些误解。我们试图采用两种标准的方法来戳破人们对理解的幻想,但这两种方法的效果都很有限:尽管学生们经常犯错,但他们的观点却很坚定。关于课程效率的高等教育需要更多地考虑学生的先入为主的观念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Problematic and Persistent Post-Secondary Program Performance Preconceptions
Student conceptions about program “efficiency” shape their approach to programming and problem-solving. However, we know very little about the kinds of conceptions students have on entry into post-secondary education. In this paper we present the result of multiple iterations of a study where we ask students to rank programs on efficiency. We find students have several misconceptions across the iterations. We attempt to employ two standard techniques for puncturing people’s illusions of understanding, but both have only limited success: students have strongly-held opinions despite their frequent errors. Post-secondary education about program efficiency needs to take much more account of students’ pre-conceptions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信