统计力学中的概率

W. Myrvold
{"title":"统计力学中的概率","authors":"W. Myrvold","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199607617.013.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter deals with the question of how we should think of the probabilities introduced in statistical mechanics. It is usually said that these probabilities are introduced on the basis of our ignorance of the precise state of the system, or our incapacity to treat analytically the equations of motion in order to deliver a detailed account of the evolution of the system, or both. This suggests an epistemic reading. However, we make predictions on the basis of them, that are verified by experiment. This suggests that they be thought of as objective chances. It looks as if we have to employ both the epistemic and the objective concept, in an inconsistent way. Moreover, the standard equilibrium probabilities, applied to a system that has relaxed to equilibrium while isolated from its environment, cannot be either credences or chances. It is argued that the hybrid concept, epistemic chance, resolves these puzzles and is suited to play the role required of probability in statistical mechanics.","PeriodicalId":134498,"journal":{"name":"Beyond Chance and Credence","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probabilities in Statistical Mechanics\",\"authors\":\"W. Myrvold\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199607617.013.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter deals with the question of how we should think of the probabilities introduced in statistical mechanics. It is usually said that these probabilities are introduced on the basis of our ignorance of the precise state of the system, or our incapacity to treat analytically the equations of motion in order to deliver a detailed account of the evolution of the system, or both. This suggests an epistemic reading. However, we make predictions on the basis of them, that are verified by experiment. This suggests that they be thought of as objective chances. It looks as if we have to employ both the epistemic and the objective concept, in an inconsistent way. Moreover, the standard equilibrium probabilities, applied to a system that has relaxed to equilibrium while isolated from its environment, cannot be either credences or chances. It is argued that the hybrid concept, epistemic chance, resolves these puzzles and is suited to play the role required of probability in statistical mechanics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Beyond Chance and Credence\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Beyond Chance and Credence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199607617.013.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beyond Chance and Credence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199607617.013.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

本章讨论的问题是我们应该如何看待统计力学中引入的概率。人们通常说,这些概率是由于我们不知道系统的精确状态,或者我们没有能力解析地处理运动方程,以便详细地描述系统的演化,或者两者兼而有之。这暗示了一种认识论的解读。然而,我们在此基础上做出预测,并通过实验加以验证。这表明它们被认为是客观的机会。似乎我们必须以一种不一致的方式,同时运用认识概念和客观概念。此外,标准均衡概率,应用于一个与环境分离的松弛到平衡状态的系统,既不能是信任,也不能是机会。本文认为,认识机会这一混合概念解决了这些难题,适合在统计力学中扮演概率所需要的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Probabilities in Statistical Mechanics
This chapter deals with the question of how we should think of the probabilities introduced in statistical mechanics. It is usually said that these probabilities are introduced on the basis of our ignorance of the precise state of the system, or our incapacity to treat analytically the equations of motion in order to deliver a detailed account of the evolution of the system, or both. This suggests an epistemic reading. However, we make predictions on the basis of them, that are verified by experiment. This suggests that they be thought of as objective chances. It looks as if we have to employ both the epistemic and the objective concept, in an inconsistent way. Moreover, the standard equilibrium probabilities, applied to a system that has relaxed to equilibrium while isolated from its environment, cannot be either credences or chances. It is argued that the hybrid concept, epistemic chance, resolves these puzzles and is suited to play the role required of probability in statistical mechanics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信