{"title":"评估农业项目影响的可靠方法","authors":"M. Fathurrohman","doi":"10.37706/ICONZ.2018.128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Existing studies on the impacts of amil programs are still rare and potentially contain bias in their impact estimates. This paper explains the selection problem common to simple difference method employed by these studies. Then this paper introduces two evaluation designs, difference-indifferences and randomized experiment, that can more credibly estimate program impacts, and still simple enough to be independently conducted by amil institutions.","PeriodicalId":244276,"journal":{"name":"International Conference of Zakat","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Credible Methods for Evaluating the Impacts of Amil Programs\",\"authors\":\"M. Fathurrohman\",\"doi\":\"10.37706/ICONZ.2018.128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Existing studies on the impacts of amil programs are still rare and potentially contain bias in their impact estimates. This paper explains the selection problem common to simple difference method employed by these studies. Then this paper introduces two evaluation designs, difference-indifferences and randomized experiment, that can more credibly estimate program impacts, and still simple enough to be independently conducted by amil institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference of Zakat\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference of Zakat\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37706/ICONZ.2018.128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference of Zakat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37706/ICONZ.2018.128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Credible Methods for Evaluating the Impacts of Amil Programs
Existing studies on the impacts of amil programs are still rare and potentially contain bias in their impact estimates. This paper explains the selection problem common to simple difference method employed by these studies. Then this paper introduces two evaluation designs, difference-indifferences and randomized experiment, that can more credibly estimate program impacts, and still simple enough to be independently conducted by amil institutions.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
