一种基于对抗风险的网络架构安全建模与设计方法

Paul A. Wortman, Fatemeh Tehranipoor, J. Chandy
{"title":"一种基于对抗风险的网络架构安全建模与设计方法","authors":"Paul A. Wortman, Fatemeh Tehranipoor, J. Chandy","doi":"10.1109/CyberSecPODS.2018.8560685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Network architecture design and verification has become increasingly complicated as a greater number of security considerations, implementations, and factors are included in the design process. In the design process, one must account for various costs of interwoven layers of security. Generally these costs are simplified for evaluation of risk to the network. The obvious implications of adding security are the need to account for the impacts of loss (risk) and accounting for the ensuing increased design costs. The considerations that are not traditionally examined are those of the adversary and the defender of a given system. Without accounting for the view point of the individuals interacting with a network architecture, one can not verify and select the most advantageous security implementation. This work presents a method for obtaining a security metric that takes into account not only the risk of the defender, but also the probability of an attack originating from the motivation of the adversary. We then move to a more meaningful metric based on a monetary unit that architects can use in choosing a best fit solution for a given network critical path design problem.","PeriodicalId":387054,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Cyber Security and Protection of Digital Services (Cyber Security)","volume":"184 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Adversarial Risk-based Approach for Network Architecture Security Modeling and Design\",\"authors\":\"Paul A. Wortman, Fatemeh Tehranipoor, J. Chandy\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CyberSecPODS.2018.8560685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Network architecture design and verification has become increasingly complicated as a greater number of security considerations, implementations, and factors are included in the design process. In the design process, one must account for various costs of interwoven layers of security. Generally these costs are simplified for evaluation of risk to the network. The obvious implications of adding security are the need to account for the impacts of loss (risk) and accounting for the ensuing increased design costs. The considerations that are not traditionally examined are those of the adversary and the defender of a given system. Without accounting for the view point of the individuals interacting with a network architecture, one can not verify and select the most advantageous security implementation. This work presents a method for obtaining a security metric that takes into account not only the risk of the defender, but also the probability of an attack originating from the motivation of the adversary. We then move to a more meaningful metric based on a monetary unit that architects can use in choosing a best fit solution for a given network critical path design problem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":387054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 International Conference on Cyber Security and Protection of Digital Services (Cyber Security)\",\"volume\":\"184 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 International Conference on Cyber Security and Protection of Digital Services (Cyber Security)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CyberSecPODS.2018.8560685\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Cyber Security and Protection of Digital Services (Cyber Security)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CyberSecPODS.2018.8560685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

网络架构设计和验证变得越来越复杂,因为在设计过程中包含了更多的安全考虑、实现和因素。在设计过程中,必须考虑到交织在一起的安全层的各种成本。一般来说,为了评估网络的风险,这些成本被简化了。增加安全性的明显含义是需要考虑损失(风险)的影响以及随后增加的设计成本。传统上没有审查的考虑因素是给定系统的对手和捍卫者。如果不考虑与网络体系结构交互的个体的观点,就无法验证和选择最有利的安全实现。这项工作提出了一种获得安全度量的方法,该度量不仅考虑了防御者的风险,还考虑了来自对手动机的攻击概率。然后,我们转向基于货币单位的更有意义的度量,架构师可以使用它来为给定的网络关键路径设计问题选择最合适的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Adversarial Risk-based Approach for Network Architecture Security Modeling and Design
Network architecture design and verification has become increasingly complicated as a greater number of security considerations, implementations, and factors are included in the design process. In the design process, one must account for various costs of interwoven layers of security. Generally these costs are simplified for evaluation of risk to the network. The obvious implications of adding security are the need to account for the impacts of loss (risk) and accounting for the ensuing increased design costs. The considerations that are not traditionally examined are those of the adversary and the defender of a given system. Without accounting for the view point of the individuals interacting with a network architecture, one can not verify and select the most advantageous security implementation. This work presents a method for obtaining a security metric that takes into account not only the risk of the defender, but also the probability of an attack originating from the motivation of the adversary. We then move to a more meaningful metric based on a monetary unit that architects can use in choosing a best fit solution for a given network critical path design problem.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信