最近LALR(1)前瞻集算法的统一观点

F. Ives
{"title":"最近LALR(1)前瞻集算法的统一观点","authors":"F. Ives","doi":"10.1145/12276.13324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the introduction of LALR parsing, several algorithms have been presented for the computation of the lookahead sets needed to produce an LALR parser. The algorithm in Aho and Ullman[1] has perhaps received the widest exposure. The recent algorithms by DeRemer and Pennello[2] and Park, Choe, and Chang[4] are the most efficient.\nA new algorithm has been developed from an algorithm originally based on the Aho and Ullman algorithm and subsequently modified to take advantage of the efficiencies introduced by the DeRemer and Pennello algorithm. The new algorithm performs better than the Park, Choe, and Chang algorithm, and both perform better than the DeRemer and Pennello algorithm. The reasons for the relative performances are easily understood when the algorithms are presented in a common light.","PeriodicalId":414056,"journal":{"name":"SIGPLAN Conferences and Workshops","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unifying view of recent LALR(1) lookahead set algorithms\",\"authors\":\"F. Ives\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/12276.13324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the introduction of LALR parsing, several algorithms have been presented for the computation of the lookahead sets needed to produce an LALR parser. The algorithm in Aho and Ullman[1] has perhaps received the widest exposure. The recent algorithms by DeRemer and Pennello[2] and Park, Choe, and Chang[4] are the most efficient.\\nA new algorithm has been developed from an algorithm originally based on the Aho and Ullman algorithm and subsequently modified to take advantage of the efficiencies introduced by the DeRemer and Pennello algorithm. The new algorithm performs better than the Park, Choe, and Chang algorithm, and both perform better than the DeRemer and Pennello algorithm. The reasons for the relative performances are easily understood when the algorithms are presented in a common light.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIGPLAN Conferences and Workshops\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIGPLAN Conferences and Workshops\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/12276.13324\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGPLAN Conferences and Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/12276.13324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

自从引入LALR解析以来,已经提出了几种算法来计算生成LALR解析器所需的前瞻集。Aho和Ullman[1]中的算法可能得到了最广泛的曝光。最近由DeRemer和Pennello[2]以及Park, Choe, and Chang[4]提出的算法是最有效的。该算法最初基于Aho和Ullman算法,随后进行了修改,以利用DeRemer和Pennello算法引入的效率,从而开发了一种新的算法。新算法的性能优于Park、Choe、Chang算法,也优于DeRemer和Pennello算法。当这些算法以一种共同的方式呈现时,相对性能的原因很容易理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unifying view of recent LALR(1) lookahead set algorithms
Since the introduction of LALR parsing, several algorithms have been presented for the computation of the lookahead sets needed to produce an LALR parser. The algorithm in Aho and Ullman[1] has perhaps received the widest exposure. The recent algorithms by DeRemer and Pennello[2] and Park, Choe, and Chang[4] are the most efficient. A new algorithm has been developed from an algorithm originally based on the Aho and Ullman algorithm and subsequently modified to take advantage of the efficiencies introduced by the DeRemer and Pennello algorithm. The new algorithm performs better than the Park, Choe, and Chang algorithm, and both perform better than the DeRemer and Pennello algorithm. The reasons for the relative performances are easily understood when the algorithms are presented in a common light.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信