国内生产替代市场消费?利用大衰退的房价冲击估算弹性

J. Been, S. Rohwedder, M. Hurd
{"title":"国内生产替代市场消费?利用大衰退的房价冲击估算弹性","authors":"J. Been, S. Rohwedder, M. Hurd","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2745152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The theory of home production suggests substitutability between market consumption and home production. The current paper estimates the intratemporal elasticity between home production and market consumption from within-person variation. Shocks in houseprices induced by the Great Recession are used to infer the extent to which persons adjusted home production in response to decreasing market consumption possibilities. By using a panel data set with detailed information on both consumption spending and time-use, we find an elasticity of -0.65. Although the scope for substitution is limited (about 12% of total consumption), there are non-negligible possibilities to substitute away from market consumption to home production.","PeriodicalId":357131,"journal":{"name":"Netspar Research Paper Series","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Home Production as a Substitute to Market Consumption? Estimating the Elasticity Using Houseprice Shocks from the Great Recession\",\"authors\":\"J. Been, S. Rohwedder, M. Hurd\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2745152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The theory of home production suggests substitutability between market consumption and home production. The current paper estimates the intratemporal elasticity between home production and market consumption from within-person variation. Shocks in houseprices induced by the Great Recession are used to infer the extent to which persons adjusted home production in response to decreasing market consumption possibilities. By using a panel data set with detailed information on both consumption spending and time-use, we find an elasticity of -0.65. Although the scope for substitution is limited (about 12% of total consumption), there are non-negligible possibilities to substitute away from market consumption to home production.\",\"PeriodicalId\":357131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Netspar Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Netspar Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2745152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Netspar Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2745152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

家庭生产理论提出了市场消费与家庭生产之间的可替代性。本文从人的内部变化来估计家庭生产和市场消费之间的时间内弹性。大衰退引起的房价冲击被用来推断人们调整家庭生产以应对市场消费可能性下降的程度。通过使用包含消费支出和时间使用详细信息的面板数据集,我们发现弹性为-0.65。虽然替代范围有限(约占总消费量的12%),但从市场消费转向家庭生产的替代可能性不容忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Home Production as a Substitute to Market Consumption? Estimating the Elasticity Using Houseprice Shocks from the Great Recession
The theory of home production suggests substitutability between market consumption and home production. The current paper estimates the intratemporal elasticity between home production and market consumption from within-person variation. Shocks in houseprices induced by the Great Recession are used to infer the extent to which persons adjusted home production in response to decreasing market consumption possibilities. By using a panel data set with detailed information on both consumption spending and time-use, we find an elasticity of -0.65. Although the scope for substitution is limited (about 12% of total consumption), there are non-negligible possibilities to substitute away from market consumption to home production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信