分支进入增值精神分裂症的旅程

Charlène A. Herbain
{"title":"分支进入增值精神分裂症的旅程","authors":"Charlène A. Herbain","doi":"10.5235/20488432.2.3.203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notion of branch has long raised questions in VAT matters. The judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Crédit Lyonnais case gives an opportunity to build a comprehensive picture of that notion. This article discusses the European VAT provisions governing the status of branches as well as the Crédit Lyonnais case to show that the conclusions reached by the Court negate the effects on the deduction right of the VAT status of branches. It goes on to propose a dissenting analysis supporting the harmonisation of the VAT deduction right at the EU level.","PeriodicalId":114680,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The journey of branches into VAT schizophrenia\",\"authors\":\"Charlène A. Herbain\",\"doi\":\"10.5235/20488432.2.3.203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The notion of branch has long raised questions in VAT matters. The judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Crédit Lyonnais case gives an opportunity to build a comprehensive picture of that notion. This article discusses the European VAT provisions governing the status of branches as well as the Crédit Lyonnais case to show that the conclusions reached by the Court negate the effects on the deduction right of the VAT status of branches. It goes on to propose a dissenting analysis supporting the harmonisation of the VAT deduction right at the EU level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of VAT/GST Law\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of VAT/GST Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5235/20488432.2.3.203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5235/20488432.2.3.203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

长期以来,分支机构的概念在增值税事务中引发了一些问题。欧洲联盟法院对克雷萨迪·里昂一案的判决提供了一个全面了解这一概念的机会。本文讨论了管理分支机构地位的欧洲增值税规定以及crassdit Lyonnais案,以表明法院得出的结论否定了分支机构增值税地位抵扣权的影响。它接着提出了一项反对分析,支持在欧盟层面统一增值税扣除额。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The journey of branches into VAT schizophrenia
The notion of branch has long raised questions in VAT matters. The judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Crédit Lyonnais case gives an opportunity to build a comprehensive picture of that notion. This article discusses the European VAT provisions governing the status of branches as well as the Crédit Lyonnais case to show that the conclusions reached by the Court negate the effects on the deduction right of the VAT status of branches. It goes on to propose a dissenting analysis supporting the harmonisation of the VAT deduction right at the EU level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信