检验理查森定律:关于暴力数据中幂律的(警世)注解

R. Zwetsloot
{"title":"检验理查森定律:关于暴力数据中幂律的(警世)注解","authors":"R. Zwetsloot","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3112804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Richardson’s Law says that the relationship between the size of violent wartime events and their frequency is characterized by a simple probability distribution called a power law. Power law distributions have been found in both civil war violence and terrorist attacks and have recently served as the foundation for novel theories of conflict, solutions to missing data problems, and prediction models. This note revisits Richardson’s Law in light of recent data collection efforts, looking at all relevant micro-level conflict event data publicly available in the world today (685,000 events across 16 data sets). I find substantially less support for Richardson’s Law than past research, suggesting serious caveats to claims about its universal nature. By identifying new stylized facts about the heavy-tailed nature of violence, this note lays the groundwork for more nuanced analyses of conflict severity.","PeriodicalId":234067,"journal":{"name":"Conflict Studies: Scientific Study eJournal","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing Richardson's Law: A (Cautionary) Note on Power Laws in Violence Data\",\"authors\":\"R. Zwetsloot\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3112804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Richardson’s Law says that the relationship between the size of violent wartime events and their frequency is characterized by a simple probability distribution called a power law. Power law distributions have been found in both civil war violence and terrorist attacks and have recently served as the foundation for novel theories of conflict, solutions to missing data problems, and prediction models. This note revisits Richardson’s Law in light of recent data collection efforts, looking at all relevant micro-level conflict event data publicly available in the world today (685,000 events across 16 data sets). I find substantially less support for Richardson’s Law than past research, suggesting serious caveats to claims about its universal nature. By identifying new stylized facts about the heavy-tailed nature of violence, this note lays the groundwork for more nuanced analyses of conflict severity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":234067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conflict Studies: Scientific Study eJournal\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conflict Studies: Scientific Study eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3112804\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict Studies: Scientific Study eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3112804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

理查森定律认为,战争时期暴力事件的规模和发生频率之间的关系是一个简单的概率分布,称为幂律。幂律分布已经在内战暴力和恐怖袭击中被发现,并且最近被作为新的冲突理论、缺失数据问题的解决方案和预测模型的基础。本文根据最近的数据收集工作,回顾了理查森定律,查看了当今世界上公开可用的所有相关微观层面冲突事件数据(16个数据集中的685,000个事件)。我发现,与过去的研究相比,理查森定律得到的支持要少得多,这表明,关于理查森定律普遍存在的说法需要严肃地加以警告。通过识别关于暴力的重尾本质的新的程式化事实,本文为对冲突严重性进行更细致的分析奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Testing Richardson's Law: A (Cautionary) Note on Power Laws in Violence Data
Richardson’s Law says that the relationship between the size of violent wartime events and their frequency is characterized by a simple probability distribution called a power law. Power law distributions have been found in both civil war violence and terrorist attacks and have recently served as the foundation for novel theories of conflict, solutions to missing data problems, and prediction models. This note revisits Richardson’s Law in light of recent data collection efforts, looking at all relevant micro-level conflict event data publicly available in the world today (685,000 events across 16 data sets). I find substantially less support for Richardson’s Law than past research, suggesting serious caveats to claims about its universal nature. By identifying new stylized facts about the heavy-tailed nature of violence, this note lays the groundwork for more nuanced analyses of conflict severity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信