尼泊尔税收弹性与浮力:对经验证据的重新审视

Pitambar Bhandari, Madhav Dangal, T. Koirala, Sajana Silpakar
{"title":"尼泊尔税收弹性与浮力:对经验证据的重新审视","authors":"Pitambar Bhandari, Madhav Dangal, T. Koirala, Sajana Silpakar","doi":"10.3126/nrber.v29i1.52528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we use autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach to cointegration developed by Pesaran et al. (1999) to estimate the elasticity and buoyancy coefficients of various revenue heads. We find that long-run buoyancy coefficients are greater than unity for all revenue heads except for custom duty whereas elasticity coefficients except for VAT are smaller than unity. Short-run buoyancy and elasticity coefficients for all revenue heads are found smaller than unity. We find OLS estimates of these coefficients to be spurious for the sample 1975-2016. These coefficients will be biased if data generating process (DGP) excludes tax exemption. All components of revenue besides income tax and VAT are found to be neutral to inflation. Empirical evidence suggests that custom reform should get top priority in the reform of revenue administration.","PeriodicalId":372963,"journal":{"name":"NRB Economic Review","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elasticity and Buoyancy of Taxation in Nepal: A Revisit of the Empirical Evidence\",\"authors\":\"Pitambar Bhandari, Madhav Dangal, T. Koirala, Sajana Silpakar\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/nrber.v29i1.52528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we use autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach to cointegration developed by Pesaran et al. (1999) to estimate the elasticity and buoyancy coefficients of various revenue heads. We find that long-run buoyancy coefficients are greater than unity for all revenue heads except for custom duty whereas elasticity coefficients except for VAT are smaller than unity. Short-run buoyancy and elasticity coefficients for all revenue heads are found smaller than unity. We find OLS estimates of these coefficients to be spurious for the sample 1975-2016. These coefficients will be biased if data generating process (DGP) excludes tax exemption. All components of revenue besides income tax and VAT are found to be neutral to inflation. Empirical evidence suggests that custom reform should get top priority in the reform of revenue administration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":372963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NRB Economic Review\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NRB Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/nrber.v29i1.52528\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NRB Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/nrber.v29i1.52528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们使用Pesaran等人(1999)开发的自回归分布滞后(ARDL)协整方法来估计各种收入头的弹性和浮力系数。我们发现,除关税外,所有收入头部的长期浮力系数大于单位,而除增值税外的弹性系数小于单位。所有收入头的短期浮力和弹性系数都小于1。我们发现,对于1975-2016年的样本,这些系数的OLS估计是假的。如果数据生成过程(DGP)不包括免税,这些系数将有偏差。除所得税和增值税外,收入的所有组成部分对通货膨胀都是中性的。经验证据表明,海关改革应成为税收管理改革的重中之重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Elasticity and Buoyancy of Taxation in Nepal: A Revisit of the Empirical Evidence
In this paper, we use autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach to cointegration developed by Pesaran et al. (1999) to estimate the elasticity and buoyancy coefficients of various revenue heads. We find that long-run buoyancy coefficients are greater than unity for all revenue heads except for custom duty whereas elasticity coefficients except for VAT are smaller than unity. Short-run buoyancy and elasticity coefficients for all revenue heads are found smaller than unity. We find OLS estimates of these coefficients to be spurious for the sample 1975-2016. These coefficients will be biased if data generating process (DGP) excludes tax exemption. All components of revenue besides income tax and VAT are found to be neutral to inflation. Empirical evidence suggests that custom reform should get top priority in the reform of revenue administration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信