为什么“没有更糟”是更糟

2013 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops Pub Date : 2013-05-23 DOI:10.1109/SPW.2013.6914701

John Aycock, John P. Sullins

{"title":"为什么“没有更糟”是更糟","authors":"John Aycock, John P. Sullins","doi":"10.1109/SPW.2013.6914701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We argue that a common ethical justification for computer security research reflects a naively utilitarian bias, and that this justification would be rejected under other ethical theories. By examining this issue, we hope to raise the ethical bar for security research and suggest some ways that this problem might be addressed using ideas from computer and information ethics.","PeriodicalId":383569,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops","volume":"351 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why \\\"no worse off\\\" is worse off\",\"authors\":\"John Aycock, John P. Sullins\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SPW.2013.6914701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We argue that a common ethical justification for computer security research reflects a naively utilitarian bias, and that this justification would be rejected under other ethical theories. By examining this issue, we hope to raise the ethical bar for security research and suggest some ways that this problem might be addressed using ideas from computer and information ethics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops\",\"volume\":\"351 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPW.2013.6914701\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPW.2013.6914701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

我们认为，计算机安全研究的常见伦理理由反映了一种天真的功利主义偏见，这种理由在其他伦理理论下会被拒绝。通过研究这个问题，我们希望提高安全研究的道德标准，并提出一些方法，可以利用计算机和信息伦理的思想来解决这个问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Why "no worse off" is worse off

We argue that a common ethical justification for computer security research reflects a naively utilitarian bias, and that this justification would be rejected under other ethical theories. By examining this issue, we hope to raise the ethical bar for security research and suggest some ways that this problem might be addressed using ideas from computer and information ethics.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2013 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops

自引率

0.00%

发文量