复杂问题的复杂网络:CNN与复值CNN的比较研究

S. Chatterjee, Pavan Tummala, O. Speck, A. Nürnberger
{"title":"复杂问题的复杂网络:CNN与复值CNN的比较研究","authors":"S. Chatterjee, Pavan Tummala, O. Speck, A. Nürnberger","doi":"10.1109/IPAS55744.2022.10053060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neural networks, especially convolutional neural networks (CNN), are one of the most common tools these days used in computer vision. Most of these networks work with real-valued data using real-valued features. Complex-valued convolutional neural networks (CV-CNN) can preserve the algebraic structure of complex-valued input data and have the potential to learn more complex relationships between the input and the ground-truth. Although some comparisons of CNNs and CV-CNNs for different tasks have been performed in the past, a large-scale investigation comparing different models operating on different tasks has not been conducted. Furthermore, because complex features contain both real and imaginary components, CV-CNNs have double the number of trainable parameters as real-valued CNNs in terms of the actual number of trainable parameters. Whether or not the improvements in performance with CV-CNN observed in the past have been because of the complex features or just because of having double the number of trainable parameters has not yet been explored. This paper presents a comparative study of CNN, CNNx2 (CNN with double the number of trainable parameters as the CNN), and CV-CNN. The experiments were performed using seven models for two different tasks - brain tumour classification and segmentation in brain MRIs. The results have revealed that the CV-CNN models outperformed the CNN and CNNx2 models.","PeriodicalId":322228,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Image Processing Applications and Systems (IPAS)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complex Network for Complex Problems: A comparative study of CNN and Complex-valued CNN\",\"authors\":\"S. Chatterjee, Pavan Tummala, O. Speck, A. Nürnberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IPAS55744.2022.10053060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Neural networks, especially convolutional neural networks (CNN), are one of the most common tools these days used in computer vision. Most of these networks work with real-valued data using real-valued features. Complex-valued convolutional neural networks (CV-CNN) can preserve the algebraic structure of complex-valued input data and have the potential to learn more complex relationships between the input and the ground-truth. Although some comparisons of CNNs and CV-CNNs for different tasks have been performed in the past, a large-scale investigation comparing different models operating on different tasks has not been conducted. Furthermore, because complex features contain both real and imaginary components, CV-CNNs have double the number of trainable parameters as real-valued CNNs in terms of the actual number of trainable parameters. Whether or not the improvements in performance with CV-CNN observed in the past have been because of the complex features or just because of having double the number of trainable parameters has not yet been explored. This paper presents a comparative study of CNN, CNNx2 (CNN with double the number of trainable parameters as the CNN), and CV-CNN. The experiments were performed using seven models for two different tasks - brain tumour classification and segmentation in brain MRIs. The results have revealed that the CV-CNN models outperformed the CNN and CNNx2 models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":322228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Image Processing Applications and Systems (IPAS)\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Image Processing Applications and Systems (IPAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPAS55744.2022.10053060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Image Processing Applications and Systems (IPAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPAS55744.2022.10053060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

神经网络,尤其是卷积神经网络(CNN),是当今计算机视觉中最常用的工具之一。这些网络大多使用实值特征处理实值数据。复值卷积神经网络(CV-CNN)可以保留复值输入数据的代数结构,并具有学习输入与真值之间更复杂关系的潜力。虽然过去已经对cnn和cv - cnn在不同任务下的运行情况进行了一些比较,但还没有对不同模型在不同任务下的运行情况进行大规模的比较研究。此外,由于复杂特征既包含实分量又包含虚分量,cv - cnn在可训练参数的实际数量上是实值cnn的两倍。过去观察到的CV-CNN在性能上的改进是由于复杂的特征还是仅仅因为可训练参数的数量增加了一倍,目前还没有研究。本文对CNN、CNNx2(可训练参数数是CNN的两倍的CNN)和CV-CNN进行了比较研究。实验使用7个模型来完成两个不同的任务——脑部肿瘤的分类和脑核磁共振成像的分割。结果表明,CV-CNN模型优于CNN和CNNx2模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complex Network for Complex Problems: A comparative study of CNN and Complex-valued CNN
Neural networks, especially convolutional neural networks (CNN), are one of the most common tools these days used in computer vision. Most of these networks work with real-valued data using real-valued features. Complex-valued convolutional neural networks (CV-CNN) can preserve the algebraic structure of complex-valued input data and have the potential to learn more complex relationships between the input and the ground-truth. Although some comparisons of CNNs and CV-CNNs for different tasks have been performed in the past, a large-scale investigation comparing different models operating on different tasks has not been conducted. Furthermore, because complex features contain both real and imaginary components, CV-CNNs have double the number of trainable parameters as real-valued CNNs in terms of the actual number of trainable parameters. Whether or not the improvements in performance with CV-CNN observed in the past have been because of the complex features or just because of having double the number of trainable parameters has not yet been explored. This paper presents a comparative study of CNN, CNNx2 (CNN with double the number of trainable parameters as the CNN), and CV-CNN. The experiments were performed using seven models for two different tasks - brain tumour classification and segmentation in brain MRIs. The results have revealed that the CV-CNN models outperformed the CNN and CNNx2 models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信