带有信号的随机对策的定性确定性和可判决性

N. Bertrand, B. Genest, H. Gimbert
{"title":"带有信号的随机对策的定性确定性和可判决性","authors":"N. Bertrand, B. Genest, H. Gimbert","doi":"10.1145/3107926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the standard model of finite two-person zero-sum stochastic games with signals. We are interested in the existence of almost-surely winning or positively winning strategies, under reachability, safety, Buchi or co-Buchi winning objectives. We prove two qualitative determinacy results. First, in a reachability game either player $1$ can achieve almost-surely the reachability objective, or player 2 can ensure surely the complementary safety objective, or both players have positively winning strategies. Second, in a Buchi game if player 1 cannot achieve almost-surely the Buchi objective, then player 2 can ensure positively the complementary co-Buchi objective. We prove that players only need strategies with finite-memory, whose sizes range from no memory at all to doubly-exponential number of states, with matching lower bounds. Together with the qualitative determinacy results, we also provide fix-point algorithms for deciding which player has an almost-surely winning or a positively winning strategy and for computing the finite memory strategy. Complexity ranges from EXPTIME to 2-EXPTIME with matching lower bounds, and better complexity can be achieved for some special cases where one of the players is better informed than her opponent.","PeriodicalId":415902,"journal":{"name":"2009 24th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic In Computer Science","volume":"2005 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"63","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualitative Determinacy and Decidability of Stochastic Games with Signals\",\"authors\":\"N. Bertrand, B. Genest, H. Gimbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3107926\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider the standard model of finite two-person zero-sum stochastic games with signals. We are interested in the existence of almost-surely winning or positively winning strategies, under reachability, safety, Buchi or co-Buchi winning objectives. We prove two qualitative determinacy results. First, in a reachability game either player $1$ can achieve almost-surely the reachability objective, or player 2 can ensure surely the complementary safety objective, or both players have positively winning strategies. Second, in a Buchi game if player 1 cannot achieve almost-surely the Buchi objective, then player 2 can ensure positively the complementary co-Buchi objective. We prove that players only need strategies with finite-memory, whose sizes range from no memory at all to doubly-exponential number of states, with matching lower bounds. Together with the qualitative determinacy results, we also provide fix-point algorithms for deciding which player has an almost-surely winning or a positively winning strategy and for computing the finite memory strategy. Complexity ranges from EXPTIME to 2-EXPTIME with matching lower bounds, and better complexity can be achieved for some special cases where one of the players is better informed than her opponent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":415902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 24th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic In Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"2005 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"63\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 24th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic In Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3107926\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 24th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic In Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3107926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

摘要

我们考虑了有限的带有信号的二人零和随机对策的标准模型。我们感兴趣的是在可达性、安全性、布吉或共同布吉获胜目标下,几乎肯定会获胜或肯定会获胜的策略的存在。我们证明了两个定性的确定性结果。首先,在可达性博弈中,玩家1可以几乎肯定地实现可达性目标,或者玩家2可以肯定地确保互补安全目标,或者两个玩家都有积极的获胜策略。其次,在Buchi博弈中,如果玩家1不能几乎肯定地实现Buchi目标,那么玩家2可以肯定地确保互补的共同Buchi目标。我们证明玩家只需要有限内存的策略,其大小范围从完全没有内存到双指数状态数,具有匹配的下界。与定性确定性结果一起,我们还提供了定点算法,用于确定哪个玩家具有几乎肯定获胜或积极获胜的策略,并用于计算有限记忆策略。复杂度范围从EXPTIME到2-EXPTIME,具有匹配的下限,并且在某些特殊情况下,其中一个玩家比她的对手更了解情况,可以实现更好的复杂度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Qualitative Determinacy and Decidability of Stochastic Games with Signals
We consider the standard model of finite two-person zero-sum stochastic games with signals. We are interested in the existence of almost-surely winning or positively winning strategies, under reachability, safety, Buchi or co-Buchi winning objectives. We prove two qualitative determinacy results. First, in a reachability game either player $1$ can achieve almost-surely the reachability objective, or player 2 can ensure surely the complementary safety objective, or both players have positively winning strategies. Second, in a Buchi game if player 1 cannot achieve almost-surely the Buchi objective, then player 2 can ensure positively the complementary co-Buchi objective. We prove that players only need strategies with finite-memory, whose sizes range from no memory at all to doubly-exponential number of states, with matching lower bounds. Together with the qualitative determinacy results, we also provide fix-point algorithms for deciding which player has an almost-surely winning or a positively winning strategy and for computing the finite memory strategy. Complexity ranges from EXPTIME to 2-EXPTIME with matching lower bounds, and better complexity can be achieved for some special cases where one of the players is better informed than her opponent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信