{"title":"非骨质疏松性压缩性骨折患者腰椎后凸成形术内并发症的比较","authors":"Calvin R. Chen","doi":"10.36076/pmcr.2018/2/221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Vertebral augmentation is a\nsurgical procedure used to stabilize fractured\nvertebrae and reduce pain in patients with compression\nfractures. When intra-operative and\npost-operative complications do occur, they can\nhave dire consequences. Some of the common\nrisks associated with kyphoplasty are worsening\nof the fracture, infections, spinal cord compression,\netc. Typically, we do not consider the risk\nof instrumentation failure.\nObjectives: In 2 cases, we describe patients\nwho has undergone kyphoplasties with live\nfluoroscopic guidance. Both procedures used\na unipedicular approach and the CareFusion\nsystem (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ).\nThe CareFusion AVAFlex curved augmentation\nneedle was used, and intra-operatively the\nhandle broke off at the neck making it difficult\nto remove the cannula and curved needle. To\nremove the system, an Arthrex Reamer (Arthrex\nInc., Naples, NY).was used with Chuck Key (Arthrex\nInc., Naples, NY).\nStudy Design: Case report.\nSetting: Outpatient Interventional Pain Clinic.\nMethods: The vertebral body was accessed with\nan AVAFlex curved needle, a CareFusion AVAMax\nvertebral balloon, and Cement injection with\npolymethylmethacrylate, were used. The removal\nof the AVAFlex cannula was attempted with a gripping\nand pulling motion of the blue handle on the\ncannula, which resulted in the handle breaking at\nthe most distal portion of the cannula. The cannula\nwas then removed using the Arthrex Reamer with\nChuck Key. The entire cannula was successfully\nremoved from the vertebral body after cement had\nbeen delivered.\nResults: The density of bone tissue in a traumatic\ncompression fracture of a nonosteoporotic individual\nwill be higher and less porous when placing\nthe needle and cannulas. Also, it is important to\nhave an understanding of the different instruments\nthat are available in the operative setting.\nLimitations: Small sample size.\nConclusion: Instrumentation experience, understanding\nhow to handle instrument failures, bone\nhealth of the patient, and the history of mechanism\nfor compression fracture should all be considered\nwhen performing kyphoplasty.\nKey words: Kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, compression\nfracture, instrumentation failure","PeriodicalId":110696,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Case Reports","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intra-Operative Complic atio n of Lumbar Kyphoplasty Instrumentatio n\\nin Non-Osteoporotic Patients with Compression Fractures\",\"authors\":\"Calvin R. Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.36076/pmcr.2018/2/221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Vertebral augmentation is a\\nsurgical procedure used to stabilize fractured\\nvertebrae and reduce pain in patients with compression\\nfractures. When intra-operative and\\npost-operative complications do occur, they can\\nhave dire consequences. Some of the common\\nrisks associated with kyphoplasty are worsening\\nof the fracture, infections, spinal cord compression,\\netc. Typically, we do not consider the risk\\nof instrumentation failure.\\nObjectives: In 2 cases, we describe patients\\nwho has undergone kyphoplasties with live\\nfluoroscopic guidance. Both procedures used\\na unipedicular approach and the CareFusion\\nsystem (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ).\\nThe CareFusion AVAFlex curved augmentation\\nneedle was used, and intra-operatively the\\nhandle broke off at the neck making it difficult\\nto remove the cannula and curved needle. To\\nremove the system, an Arthrex Reamer (Arthrex\\nInc., Naples, NY).was used with Chuck Key (Arthrex\\nInc., Naples, NY).\\nStudy Design: Case report.\\nSetting: Outpatient Interventional Pain Clinic.\\nMethods: The vertebral body was accessed with\\nan AVAFlex curved needle, a CareFusion AVAMax\\nvertebral balloon, and Cement injection with\\npolymethylmethacrylate, were used. The removal\\nof the AVAFlex cannula was attempted with a gripping\\nand pulling motion of the blue handle on the\\ncannula, which resulted in the handle breaking at\\nthe most distal portion of the cannula. The cannula\\nwas then removed using the Arthrex Reamer with\\nChuck Key. The entire cannula was successfully\\nremoved from the vertebral body after cement had\\nbeen delivered.\\nResults: The density of bone tissue in a traumatic\\ncompression fracture of a nonosteoporotic individual\\nwill be higher and less porous when placing\\nthe needle and cannulas. Also, it is important to\\nhave an understanding of the different instruments\\nthat are available in the operative setting.\\nLimitations: Small sample size.\\nConclusion: Instrumentation experience, understanding\\nhow to handle instrument failures, bone\\nhealth of the patient, and the history of mechanism\\nfor compression fracture should all be considered\\nwhen performing kyphoplasty.\\nKey words: Kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, compression\\nfracture, instrumentation failure\",\"PeriodicalId\":110696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Management Case Reports\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Management Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36076/pmcr.2018/2/221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36076/pmcr.2018/2/221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:椎体增强术是一种用于稳定骨折椎体和减轻压缩性骨折患者疼痛的外科手术。当术中和术后并发症发生时,它们可能会产生可怕的后果。与后凸成形术相关的一些常见风险是骨折恶化、感染、脊髓压迫等。通常,我们不考虑仪器故障的风险。目的:在2例病例中,我们描述了在活体透视指导下进行后凸成形术的患者。这两种手术都采用了单一的方法和carefusion系统(Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ)。使用CareFusion AVAFlex弯曲增强针,术中颈部手柄断裂,难以取出套管和弯曲针头。要拆除该系统,需要使用Arthrex扩眼器(arthrex.com)。(那不勒斯,纽约州)。与Chuck Key (arthrexin)联合使用。(那不勒斯,纽约州)。研究设计:病例报告。地点:介入性疼痛门诊。方法:采用AVAFlex弯曲针、CareFusion avamax椎球囊及聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯水泥注射进入椎体。试图通过夹持和拉动环上的蓝色手柄来移除AVAFlex套管,这导致手柄在套管的最远端部分断裂。然后使用带卡盘键的Arthrex铰刀将套管取出。在注入水泥后,整个套管成功地从椎体中取出。结果:非骨质疏松个体创伤性压缩性骨折骨组织密度较高,且置入针和套管时骨组织孔隙较少。此外,了解手术环境中可用的不同器械也很重要。局限性:样本量小。结论:在进行后凸成形术时,应考虑内固定的经验、了解如何处理内固定故障、患者的骨骼健康状况以及压缩性骨折的机制史。关键词:后凸成形术,椎体成形术,压缩性骨折,内固定失败
Intra-Operative Complic atio n of Lumbar Kyphoplasty Instrumentatio n
in Non-Osteoporotic Patients with Compression Fractures
Background: Vertebral augmentation is a
surgical procedure used to stabilize fractured
vertebrae and reduce pain in patients with compression
fractures. When intra-operative and
post-operative complications do occur, they can
have dire consequences. Some of the common
risks associated with kyphoplasty are worsening
of the fracture, infections, spinal cord compression,
etc. Typically, we do not consider the risk
of instrumentation failure.
Objectives: In 2 cases, we describe patients
who has undergone kyphoplasties with live
fluoroscopic guidance. Both procedures used
a unipedicular approach and the CareFusion
system (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ).
The CareFusion AVAFlex curved augmentation
needle was used, and intra-operatively the
handle broke off at the neck making it difficult
to remove the cannula and curved needle. To
remove the system, an Arthrex Reamer (Arthrex
Inc., Naples, NY).was used with Chuck Key (Arthrex
Inc., Naples, NY).
Study Design: Case report.
Setting: Outpatient Interventional Pain Clinic.
Methods: The vertebral body was accessed with
an AVAFlex curved needle, a CareFusion AVAMax
vertebral balloon, and Cement injection with
polymethylmethacrylate, were used. The removal
of the AVAFlex cannula was attempted with a gripping
and pulling motion of the blue handle on the
cannula, which resulted in the handle breaking at
the most distal portion of the cannula. The cannula
was then removed using the Arthrex Reamer with
Chuck Key. The entire cannula was successfully
removed from the vertebral body after cement had
been delivered.
Results: The density of bone tissue in a traumatic
compression fracture of a nonosteoporotic individual
will be higher and less porous when placing
the needle and cannulas. Also, it is important to
have an understanding of the different instruments
that are available in the operative setting.
Limitations: Small sample size.
Conclusion: Instrumentation experience, understanding
how to handle instrument failures, bone
health of the patient, and the history of mechanism
for compression fracture should all be considered
when performing kyphoplasty.
Key words: Kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, compression
fracture, instrumentation failure