推翻网络封建主义的障碍

Tai-Ting Liu, Zain Tariq, Jay Chen, B. Raghavan
{"title":"推翻网络封建主义的障碍","authors":"Tai-Ting Liu, Zain Tariq, Jay Chen, B. Raghavan","doi":"10.1145/3152434.3152454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today's Internet scarcely resembles the mythological image of it as a fundamentally democratic system. Instead, users are at the whims of a small number of providers who control nearly everything about users' experiences on the Internet. In response, researchers and engineers have proposed, over the past decade, many systems to re-democratize the Internet, pushing control over data and systems back to the users. Yet nearly all such projects have failed. In this paper we explore why: what are the goals of such systems and what has caused them to run aground?","PeriodicalId":120886,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Barriers to Overthrowing Internet Feudalism\",\"authors\":\"Tai-Ting Liu, Zain Tariq, Jay Chen, B. Raghavan\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3152434.3152454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Today's Internet scarcely resembles the mythological image of it as a fundamentally democratic system. Instead, users are at the whims of a small number of providers who control nearly everything about users' experiences on the Internet. In response, researchers and engineers have proposed, over the past decade, many systems to re-democratize the Internet, pushing control over data and systems back to the users. Yet nearly all such projects have failed. In this paper we explore why: what are the goals of such systems and what has caused them to run aground?\",\"PeriodicalId\":120886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 16th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 16th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3152434.3152454\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3152434.3152454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

今天的互联网几乎不像神话中描述的那样是一个基本的民主制度。相反,用户受到少数供应商的控制,这些供应商几乎控制着用户在互联网上的一切体验。作为回应,在过去的十年里,研究人员和工程师们提出了许多使互联网重新民主化的系统,将对数据和系统的控制权推回到用户手中。然而,几乎所有这样的项目都以失败告终。在本文中,我们探讨了原因:这些系统的目标是什么,是什么导致它们搁浅?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Barriers to Overthrowing Internet Feudalism
Today's Internet scarcely resembles the mythological image of it as a fundamentally democratic system. Instead, users are at the whims of a small number of providers who control nearly everything about users' experiences on the Internet. In response, researchers and engineers have proposed, over the past decade, many systems to re-democratize the Internet, pushing control over data and systems back to the users. Yet nearly all such projects have failed. In this paper we explore why: what are the goals of such systems and what has caused them to run aground?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信