分布式系统并行仿真的性能分析

Y. M. Teo, S. Tay
{"title":"分布式系统并行仿真的性能分析","authors":"Y. M. Teo, S. Tay","doi":"10.1088/0967-1846/3/1/004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an analytical model to evaluate the performance of parallel simulation on distributed computing platforms. The proposed model is formalized by two important time components in parallel and distributed processing: computation time and communication time. A conservative parallel simulation of multistage interconnection networks is used as an example in our analytical model. Performance metrics such as elapsed time, speedup and simulation bandwidth associated with different schemes for partitioning/mapping parallel simulation onto distributed processors are evaluated. Our mathematical analysis identifies the major constituents of simulation overheads in these mapping strategies necessary for improving parallel simulation efficiency. We also show that a perfectly balanced workload distribution may not necessarily translate into better performance. On the contrary, we have shown that a balanced mapping of workload may increase communication overheads resulting in a longer simulation elapsed time. Our performance model has been validated against implementation results from a parallel simulation model. The analytical framework is also practical to evaluate the runtime efficiency of other simulation applications which are based on the conservative paradigm.","PeriodicalId":404872,"journal":{"name":"Distributed Syst. Eng.","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance analysis of parallel simulation on distributed systems\",\"authors\":\"Y. M. Teo, S. Tay\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/0967-1846/3/1/004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents an analytical model to evaluate the performance of parallel simulation on distributed computing platforms. The proposed model is formalized by two important time components in parallel and distributed processing: computation time and communication time. A conservative parallel simulation of multistage interconnection networks is used as an example in our analytical model. Performance metrics such as elapsed time, speedup and simulation bandwidth associated with different schemes for partitioning/mapping parallel simulation onto distributed processors are evaluated. Our mathematical analysis identifies the major constituents of simulation overheads in these mapping strategies necessary for improving parallel simulation efficiency. We also show that a perfectly balanced workload distribution may not necessarily translate into better performance. On the contrary, we have shown that a balanced mapping of workload may increase communication overheads resulting in a longer simulation elapsed time. Our performance model has been validated against implementation results from a parallel simulation model. The analytical framework is also practical to evaluate the runtime efficiency of other simulation applications which are based on the conservative paradigm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":404872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Distributed Syst. Eng.\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Distributed Syst. Eng.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-1846/3/1/004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Distributed Syst. Eng.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-1846/3/1/004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文提出了一种评估分布式计算平台上并行仿真性能的解析模型。该模型由并行和分布式处理中两个重要的时间分量:计算时间和通信时间形式化。本文以多级互联网络的保守并行仿真为例进行了分析。评估了与分区/将并行模拟映射到分布式处理器的不同方案相关的运行时间、加速和模拟带宽等性能指标。我们的数学分析确定了这些映射策略中仿真开销的主要组成部分,这些映射策略是提高并行仿真效率所必需的。我们还表明,完美平衡的工作负载分布不一定转化为更好的性能。相反,我们已经表明,平衡的工作负载映射可能会增加通信开销,从而导致更长的模拟运行时间。我们的性能模型已经通过一个并行仿真模型的实现结果进行了验证。该分析框架对于其他基于保守范式的仿真应用程序的运行时效率评估也具有实用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance analysis of parallel simulation on distributed systems
This paper presents an analytical model to evaluate the performance of parallel simulation on distributed computing platforms. The proposed model is formalized by two important time components in parallel and distributed processing: computation time and communication time. A conservative parallel simulation of multistage interconnection networks is used as an example in our analytical model. Performance metrics such as elapsed time, speedup and simulation bandwidth associated with different schemes for partitioning/mapping parallel simulation onto distributed processors are evaluated. Our mathematical analysis identifies the major constituents of simulation overheads in these mapping strategies necessary for improving parallel simulation efficiency. We also show that a perfectly balanced workload distribution may not necessarily translate into better performance. On the contrary, we have shown that a balanced mapping of workload may increase communication overheads resulting in a longer simulation elapsed time. Our performance model has been validated against implementation results from a parallel simulation model. The analytical framework is also practical to evaluate the runtime efficiency of other simulation applications which are based on the conservative paradigm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信