{"title":"工科学生如何在数据科学入门课程中辩论","authors":"Katharina Bata, Andreas Eichler, Angela Schmitz","doi":"10.52041/iase.aomcg","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Model building and validation are at the core of machine learning and a subfield of data science. In this paper, the Toulmin model is used to structure students’ approaches and analyze students' argumentation when building a model. A qualitative analysis of passages from the underlying design experiments with undergraduate engineering students shows different approaches and visual, contextual and mathematical or statistical elements that students use within their argumentation.","PeriodicalId":189852,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the IASE 2021 Satellite Conference","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How engineering students argue in an introductory course in data science\",\"authors\":\"Katharina Bata, Andreas Eichler, Angela Schmitz\",\"doi\":\"10.52041/iase.aomcg\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Model building and validation are at the core of machine learning and a subfield of data science. In this paper, the Toulmin model is used to structure students’ approaches and analyze students' argumentation when building a model. A qualitative analysis of passages from the underlying design experiments with undergraduate engineering students shows different approaches and visual, contextual and mathematical or statistical elements that students use within their argumentation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":189852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the IASE 2021 Satellite Conference\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the IASE 2021 Satellite Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52041/iase.aomcg\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the IASE 2021 Satellite Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52041/iase.aomcg","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
How engineering students argue in an introductory course in data science
Model building and validation are at the core of machine learning and a subfield of data science. In this paper, the Toulmin model is used to structure students’ approaches and analyze students' argumentation when building a model. A qualitative analysis of passages from the underlying design experiments with undergraduate engineering students shows different approaches and visual, contextual and mathematical or statistical elements that students use within their argumentation.