19世纪50年代女性对父权制的看法

A. Scott
{"title":"19世纪50年代女性对父权制的看法","authors":"A. Scott","doi":"10.2307/1918253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SOUTHERN women were scarcely to be seen in the political crisis of the 1850s. Historical works dealing with that crucial decade seldom mention a woman unless it is in a footnote citing a significant letter from a male correspondent. In women's own diaries and letters the burgeoning conflict between the North and South almost never inspired comment before John Brown's raid and rarely even then. At the same time, women were a crucial part of one southern response to the mounting outside attack on slavery. The response was an ever more vehement elaboration of what has been called the \"domestic metaphor,\" the image of a beautifully articulated, patriarchal society in which every southerner, black or white, male or female, rich or poor, had an appropriate place and was happy in it. \"The negro slaves of the South are the happiest, and, in some sense, the freest people in the world,\" George Fitzhugh wrote, describing the happy plantation on which none were oppressed by care.' \"Public opinion,\" he stoutly maintained, \"unites with self-interest, domestic affection, and municipal law to protect the slave. The man who maltreats the weak and dependent, who abuses his authority over wife, children, or slaves is universally detested.\" Slavery, Fitzhugh thought, was an admirable educational system as well as an ideal society.2 What Fitzhugh argued in theory many planters tried to make come true in real life. \"My people\" or \"my black and white family\" were phrases that rolled easily from their tongues and pens. \"I am friend and well wisher both for time and eternity to every one of them . . .\" a North Carolinian wrote to his slave overseer upon the death of a slave, expressing","PeriodicalId":331479,"journal":{"name":"Half Sisters of History","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1974-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Women's Perspective on the Patriarchy in the 1850S\",\"authors\":\"A. Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1918253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SOUTHERN women were scarcely to be seen in the political crisis of the 1850s. Historical works dealing with that crucial decade seldom mention a woman unless it is in a footnote citing a significant letter from a male correspondent. In women's own diaries and letters the burgeoning conflict between the North and South almost never inspired comment before John Brown's raid and rarely even then. At the same time, women were a crucial part of one southern response to the mounting outside attack on slavery. The response was an ever more vehement elaboration of what has been called the \\\"domestic metaphor,\\\" the image of a beautifully articulated, patriarchal society in which every southerner, black or white, male or female, rich or poor, had an appropriate place and was happy in it. \\\"The negro slaves of the South are the happiest, and, in some sense, the freest people in the world,\\\" George Fitzhugh wrote, describing the happy plantation on which none were oppressed by care.' \\\"Public opinion,\\\" he stoutly maintained, \\\"unites with self-interest, domestic affection, and municipal law to protect the slave. The man who maltreats the weak and dependent, who abuses his authority over wife, children, or slaves is universally detested.\\\" Slavery, Fitzhugh thought, was an admirable educational system as well as an ideal society.2 What Fitzhugh argued in theory many planters tried to make come true in real life. \\\"My people\\\" or \\\"my black and white family\\\" were phrases that rolled easily from their tongues and pens. \\\"I am friend and well wisher both for time and eternity to every one of them . . .\\\" a North Carolinian wrote to his slave overseer upon the death of a slave, expressing\",\"PeriodicalId\":331479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Half Sisters of History\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1974-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Half Sisters of History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1918253\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Half Sisters of History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1918253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在19世纪50年代的政治危机中,南方妇女几乎不见踪影。关于那个关键十年的历史著作很少提到女性,除非在脚注中引用一位男性记者的重要信件。在妇女自己的日记和信件中,在约翰·布朗的突袭之前,南北之间迅速发展的冲突几乎从未引起过评论,甚至在当时也很少有人评论。与此同时,女性是南方应对外部对奴隶制的攻击的关键部分。对此的回应是对所谓的“家庭隐喻”的更加激烈的阐述,这是一个清晰的父权社会的形象,在这个社会中,每个南方人,无论黑人或白人,男性或女性,富人或穷人,都有一个合适的位置,并在其中快乐。“南方的黑人奴隶是最幸福的,从某种意义上说,也是世界上最自由的人,”乔治·菲茨休(George Fitzhugh)在描述没有人受到忧虑压迫的幸福种植园时写道。“公众舆论,”他坚定地坚持说,“与个人利益、家庭感情和地方法律联合起来保护奴隶。虐待弱者和依赖他人的人,滥用自己对妻子、孩子或奴隶的权力的人,是普遍憎恨的。”菲茨休认为,奴隶制是一种令人钦佩的教育制度,也是一种理想的社会菲茨休在理论上的主张,许多种植园主都试图在现实生活中实现。“我的人民”或“我的黑人和白人家庭”是他们的口头禅。“我是他们每一个人的朋友,希望他们有时间和永恒……”一位北卡罗莱纳人在一个奴隶死后写信给他的奴隶监工,表示
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Women's Perspective on the Patriarchy in the 1850S
SOUTHERN women were scarcely to be seen in the political crisis of the 1850s. Historical works dealing with that crucial decade seldom mention a woman unless it is in a footnote citing a significant letter from a male correspondent. In women's own diaries and letters the burgeoning conflict between the North and South almost never inspired comment before John Brown's raid and rarely even then. At the same time, women were a crucial part of one southern response to the mounting outside attack on slavery. The response was an ever more vehement elaboration of what has been called the "domestic metaphor," the image of a beautifully articulated, patriarchal society in which every southerner, black or white, male or female, rich or poor, had an appropriate place and was happy in it. "The negro slaves of the South are the happiest, and, in some sense, the freest people in the world," George Fitzhugh wrote, describing the happy plantation on which none were oppressed by care.' "Public opinion," he stoutly maintained, "unites with self-interest, domestic affection, and municipal law to protect the slave. The man who maltreats the weak and dependent, who abuses his authority over wife, children, or slaves is universally detested." Slavery, Fitzhugh thought, was an admirable educational system as well as an ideal society.2 What Fitzhugh argued in theory many planters tried to make come true in real life. "My people" or "my black and white family" were phrases that rolled easily from their tongues and pens. "I am friend and well wisher both for time and eternity to every one of them . . ." a North Carolinian wrote to his slave overseer upon the death of a slave, expressing
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信