当代中国与德国的崛起:生产性类比的挑战

I. Pejic, S. Blagojevic
{"title":"当代中国与德国的崛起:生产性类比的挑战","authors":"I. Pejic, S. Blagojevic","doi":"10.2298/medjp2301093p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of a land power that is trying to develop its maritime forces has\n been viewed as an important conflict instigator among great powers. Great\n Britain shared similar concerns with the rise of Germany at the beginning of\n the 20th century. Power relations among states in East Asia, during last two\n decades, share many similarities with those of pre-World War I Europe. This\n historical analogy provides abundant information regarding the behavior of\n land and maritime states. On the other hand, the analogy is often used\n without reference to other great powers in the system and how these states\n influenced the overall balance of power. In other words, we get the notion\n that the conflict between land and maritime power is inevitable regardless\n of other actors and their position in the system. In our work we shall focus\n our attention on the two processes that are balance of power and balance of\n threat; and try to understand how these mechanisms affected the politics of\n key actors in Europe before the Great War and how they affect the politics\n of contemporary states in East Asia. Since we are discussing the balance of\n power concept the article follows ideas set forth by authors of realism.\n Comparing different approaches of great powers to balancing in the years\n before the Great War and what balancing looks like in contemporary East Asia\n we shall try to point out to some strategic misconceptions regarding this\n historical analogy.","PeriodicalId":316095,"journal":{"name":"Medjunarodni problemi","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The rise of contemporary china and Wilhelmine Germany: Challanges of productive analogy\",\"authors\":\"I. Pejic, S. Blagojevic\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/medjp2301093p\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rise of a land power that is trying to develop its maritime forces has\\n been viewed as an important conflict instigator among great powers. Great\\n Britain shared similar concerns with the rise of Germany at the beginning of\\n the 20th century. Power relations among states in East Asia, during last two\\n decades, share many similarities with those of pre-World War I Europe. This\\n historical analogy provides abundant information regarding the behavior of\\n land and maritime states. On the other hand, the analogy is often used\\n without reference to other great powers in the system and how these states\\n influenced the overall balance of power. In other words, we get the notion\\n that the conflict between land and maritime power is inevitable regardless\\n of other actors and their position in the system. In our work we shall focus\\n our attention on the two processes that are balance of power and balance of\\n threat; and try to understand how these mechanisms affected the politics of\\n key actors in Europe before the Great War and how they affect the politics\\n of contemporary states in East Asia. Since we are discussing the balance of\\n power concept the article follows ideas set forth by authors of realism.\\n Comparing different approaches of great powers to balancing in the years\\n before the Great War and what balancing looks like in contemporary East Asia\\n we shall try to point out to some strategic misconceptions regarding this\\n historical analogy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":316095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medjunarodni problemi\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medjunarodni problemi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/medjp2301093p\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medjunarodni problemi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/medjp2301093p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个试图发展海上力量的陆地大国的崛起,一直被视为大国之间冲突的重要煽动者。20世纪初,英国对德国的崛起也有类似的担忧。在过去的二十年里,东亚国家之间的权力关系与第一次世界大战前的欧洲有许多相似之处。这一历史类比为陆地国家和海洋国家的行为提供了丰富的信息。另一方面,这一类比往往没有提及该体系中的其他大国以及这些国家如何影响整体权力平衡。换句话说,我们得到的概念是,无论其他参与者及其在体系中的地位如何,陆地和海洋力量之间的冲突是不可避免的。在我们的工作中,我们将集中注意两个进程,即力量平衡和威胁平衡;并试图理解这些机制如何影响一战前欧洲主要国家的政治以及它们如何影响当代东亚国家的政治。由于我们讨论的是均势概念,本文遵循了现实主义作者的观点。通过比较一战前大国在平衡问题上的不同做法,以及当代东亚的平衡是什么样子,我们将试图指出一些关于这一历史类比的战略误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The rise of contemporary china and Wilhelmine Germany: Challanges of productive analogy
The rise of a land power that is trying to develop its maritime forces has been viewed as an important conflict instigator among great powers. Great Britain shared similar concerns with the rise of Germany at the beginning of the 20th century. Power relations among states in East Asia, during last two decades, share many similarities with those of pre-World War I Europe. This historical analogy provides abundant information regarding the behavior of land and maritime states. On the other hand, the analogy is often used without reference to other great powers in the system and how these states influenced the overall balance of power. In other words, we get the notion that the conflict between land and maritime power is inevitable regardless of other actors and their position in the system. In our work we shall focus our attention on the two processes that are balance of power and balance of threat; and try to understand how these mechanisms affected the politics of key actors in Europe before the Great War and how they affect the politics of contemporary states in East Asia. Since we are discussing the balance of power concept the article follows ideas set forth by authors of realism. Comparing different approaches of great powers to balancing in the years before the Great War and what balancing looks like in contemporary East Asia we shall try to point out to some strategic misconceptions regarding this historical analogy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信