一种评估业务流程可靠性的方法,该方法反映了每个部门的交易文档检查

Takafumi Komoto, K. Futatsugi, Nobukazu Yoshioka
{"title":"一种评估业务流程可靠性的方法,该方法反映了每个部门的交易文档检查","authors":"Takafumi Komoto, K. Futatsugi, Nobukazu Yoshioka","doi":"10.1109/COMPSAC48688.2020.00047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An assessment method is proposed to classify the reliability of business processes related to transactions into those with a high and low risk of inconsistency according to the checking status of transaction documents (such as an order form, a delivery slip, an invoice, a receipt). We show a method for objectively examining the reliability of business processes without relying solely on expert knowledge and experience. In practice, however, some departments in a company can be expected to execute transaction documents checking reliably, while others may not be able to. To cope with this, the method is extended so that assessment can be performed by reflecting the certainty of transaction documents checking for each department. Transaction documents checking for departments outside the company and outsourced departments can be excluded (such as a low-level department), and the risk of inconsistency in transaction documents can then be determined, thus improving the practicality of the assessment method.","PeriodicalId":430098,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 44th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Method for Assessing the Reliability of Business Processes that Reflects Transaction Documents Checking for each Department\",\"authors\":\"Takafumi Komoto, K. Futatsugi, Nobukazu Yoshioka\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COMPSAC48688.2020.00047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An assessment method is proposed to classify the reliability of business processes related to transactions into those with a high and low risk of inconsistency according to the checking status of transaction documents (such as an order form, a delivery slip, an invoice, a receipt). We show a method for objectively examining the reliability of business processes without relying solely on expert knowledge and experience. In practice, however, some departments in a company can be expected to execute transaction documents checking reliably, while others may not be able to. To cope with this, the method is extended so that assessment can be performed by reflecting the certainty of transaction documents checking for each department. Transaction documents checking for departments outside the company and outsourced departments can be excluded (such as a low-level department), and the risk of inconsistency in transaction documents can then be determined, thus improving the practicality of the assessment method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE 44th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE 44th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC48688.2020.00047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 44th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC48688.2020.00047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

提出了一种评估方法,根据事务文档(如订单、送货单、发票、收据)的检查状态,将与事务相关的业务流程的可靠性分为具有高不一致风险和低不一致风险的业务流程。我们展示了一种方法,可以客观地检查业务流程的可靠性,而无需仅仅依赖于专家知识和经验。然而,在实践中,可以期望公司中的某些部门可靠地执行交易文档检查,而其他部门则可能无法执行。为了解决这个问题,对该方法进行了扩展,以便通过反映每个部门的交易文件检查的确定性来进行评估。可以排除对公司外部部门和外包部门(如低级别部门)的交易文件检查,从而确定交易文件不一致的风险,从而提高评估方法的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Method for Assessing the Reliability of Business Processes that Reflects Transaction Documents Checking for each Department
An assessment method is proposed to classify the reliability of business processes related to transactions into those with a high and low risk of inconsistency according to the checking status of transaction documents (such as an order form, a delivery slip, an invoice, a receipt). We show a method for objectively examining the reliability of business processes without relying solely on expert knowledge and experience. In practice, however, some departments in a company can be expected to execute transaction documents checking reliably, while others may not be able to. To cope with this, the method is extended so that assessment can be performed by reflecting the certainty of transaction documents checking for each department. Transaction documents checking for departments outside the company and outsourced departments can be excluded (such as a low-level department), and the risk of inconsistency in transaction documents can then be determined, thus improving the practicality of the assessment method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信