{"title":"[使用ENTEROtest 1和2以及ENTERO-Rapid系统鉴定肠道细菌]。","authors":"I Sedlácek, E Pakrová","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The identification efficacy of two systems, ENTEROtest 1 & 2 and ENTERO-Rapid (fy. Lachema a. c., Brno), was compared. A total 123 well known strains of enteric bacteria were tested. The ENTEROtest 1 & 2 system correctly identified 87.0% tested strains to the species level, the ENTERO-Rapid system correctly identified 76.4% of these strains.</p>","PeriodicalId":75687,"journal":{"name":"Ceskoslovenska epidemiologie, mikrobiologie, imunologie","volume":"41 3","pages":"145-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Identification of enteric bacteria using the ENTEROtest 1 and 2 and the ENTERO-Rapid systems].\",\"authors\":\"I Sedlácek, E Pakrová\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The identification efficacy of two systems, ENTEROtest 1 & 2 and ENTERO-Rapid (fy. Lachema a. c., Brno), was compared. A total 123 well known strains of enteric bacteria were tested. The ENTEROtest 1 & 2 system correctly identified 87.0% tested strains to the species level, the ENTERO-Rapid system correctly identified 76.4% of these strains.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ceskoslovenska epidemiologie, mikrobiologie, imunologie\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"145-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ceskoslovenska epidemiologie, mikrobiologie, imunologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceskoslovenska epidemiologie, mikrobiologie, imunologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Identification of enteric bacteria using the ENTEROtest 1 and 2 and the ENTERO-Rapid systems].
The identification efficacy of two systems, ENTEROtest 1 & 2 and ENTERO-Rapid (fy. Lachema a. c., Brno), was compared. A total 123 well known strains of enteric bacteria were tested. The ENTEROtest 1 & 2 system correctly identified 87.0% tested strains to the species level, the ENTERO-Rapid system correctly identified 76.4% of these strains.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
