{"title":"[血清c反应蛋白水平——两种定量测定方法的比较]。","authors":"I Vacková, V Skokanová","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors compared the results of two methods used for the quantitative assessment of C-reactive protein: the method of radial immunodiffusion and the microturbidimetric method. The testing was based on examination of 68 sera from patients. The samples comprised sera with a CRP concentration under 230 mg/l. There was a statistically significant correlation between the results of the two compared methods (r = 0.949, p = 0.0001).</p>","PeriodicalId":75687,"journal":{"name":"Ceskoslovenska epidemiologie, mikrobiologie, imunologie","volume":"41 3","pages":"139-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Levels of C-reactive protein in serum--comparison of 2 methods used for quantitative determination].\",\"authors\":\"I Vacková, V Skokanová\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The authors compared the results of two methods used for the quantitative assessment of C-reactive protein: the method of radial immunodiffusion and the microturbidimetric method. The testing was based on examination of 68 sera from patients. The samples comprised sera with a CRP concentration under 230 mg/l. There was a statistically significant correlation between the results of the two compared methods (r = 0.949, p = 0.0001).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ceskoslovenska epidemiologie, mikrobiologie, imunologie\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"139-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ceskoslovenska epidemiologie, mikrobiologie, imunologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceskoslovenska epidemiologie, mikrobiologie, imunologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
作者比较了两种用于c反应蛋白定量评估的方法:径向免疫扩散法和微浊度法。该检测是基于对68例患者血清的检查。这些样品包括CRP浓度低于230 mg/l的血清。两种方法比较结果的相关性有统计学意义(r = 0.949, p = 0.0001)。
[Levels of C-reactive protein in serum--comparison of 2 methods used for quantitative determination].
The authors compared the results of two methods used for the quantitative assessment of C-reactive protein: the method of radial immunodiffusion and the microturbidimetric method. The testing was based on examination of 68 sera from patients. The samples comprised sera with a CRP concentration under 230 mg/l. There was a statistically significant correlation between the results of the two compared methods (r = 0.949, p = 0.0001).
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
