{"title":"可靠性测试的成本效益——什么是好的，什么是不好的","authors":"S.I. Kramer","doi":"10.1109/ARMS.1989.49648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A discussion is presented of the shortcomings of several traditional reliability tests as applied to large systems. These include the reliability qualification test and the reliability development growth test. Alternatives are suggested to yield a greater return at less cost. Finally, a proposal is offered for a novel approach to the reliability warranty.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":430861,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings., Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The cost effectiveness of reliability testing-What's good and what's not\",\"authors\":\"S.I. Kramer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ARMS.1989.49648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A discussion is presented of the shortcomings of several traditional reliability tests as applied to large systems. These include the reliability qualification test and the reliability development growth test. Alternatives are suggested to yield a greater return at less cost. Finally, a proposal is offered for a novel approach to the reliability warranty.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":430861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings., Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings., Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARMS.1989.49648\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings., Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARMS.1989.49648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The cost effectiveness of reliability testing-What's good and what's not
A discussion is presented of the shortcomings of several traditional reliability tests as applied to large systems. These include the reliability qualification test and the reliability development growth test. Alternatives are suggested to yield a greater return at less cost. Finally, a proposal is offered for a novel approach to the reliability warranty.<>
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
