TruSight肿瘤170检测的评价及其临床诊断价值

C. Heydt, R. Pappesch, K. Stecker, Martin März, S. Merkelbach-Bruse
{"title":"TruSight肿瘤170检测的评价及其临床诊断价值","authors":"C. Heydt, R. Pappesch, K. Stecker, Martin März, S. Merkelbach-Bruse","doi":"10.3390/jmp3010006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Parallel sequencing technologies have become integrated into clinical practice. This study evaluated the TruSight Tumor 170 assay for the simultaneous detection of somatic gene mutations (SNPs and indels), gene fusions and CNVs, and its implementation into routine diagnostics. Methods: Forty-four formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples analyzed previously with validated methods were evaluated with the TruSight Tumor 170 assay (Illumina). For data analysis the TruSight Tumor 170 app, the BaseSpace Variant Interpreter (Illumina), and the Molecular Health Guide Software (Molecular Health) were used. Results: All somatic gene mutations were identified when covered by the assay. Two high-level MET amplifications were detected by CNV analysis. Focal MET amplifications with a copy number below 10 were not reliably detected at the DNA-level. Twenty-one of 31 fusions and splice variants were confirmed with the assay on the RNA-level. The remaining eight aberrations were incorrect by previous methods. In two cases, no splicing was observed. Conclusions: The TruSight Tumor 170 gives reliable results even if low DNA and RNA concentrations are applied in comparison to other methods and can be used in a routine workflow to detect somatic gene mutations, gene fusions, and splice variants. However, we were not able to detect most focal gene amplifications/deletions.","PeriodicalId":124426,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Pathology","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the TruSight Tumor 170 Assay and Its Value in Clinical Diagnostics\",\"authors\":\"C. Heydt, R. Pappesch, K. Stecker, Martin März, S. Merkelbach-Bruse\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jmp3010006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Parallel sequencing technologies have become integrated into clinical practice. This study evaluated the TruSight Tumor 170 assay for the simultaneous detection of somatic gene mutations (SNPs and indels), gene fusions and CNVs, and its implementation into routine diagnostics. Methods: Forty-four formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples analyzed previously with validated methods were evaluated with the TruSight Tumor 170 assay (Illumina). For data analysis the TruSight Tumor 170 app, the BaseSpace Variant Interpreter (Illumina), and the Molecular Health Guide Software (Molecular Health) were used. Results: All somatic gene mutations were identified when covered by the assay. Two high-level MET amplifications were detected by CNV analysis. Focal MET amplifications with a copy number below 10 were not reliably detected at the DNA-level. Twenty-one of 31 fusions and splice variants were confirmed with the assay on the RNA-level. The remaining eight aberrations were incorrect by previous methods. In two cases, no splicing was observed. Conclusions: The TruSight Tumor 170 gives reliable results even if low DNA and RNA concentrations are applied in comparison to other methods and can be used in a routine workflow to detect somatic gene mutations, gene fusions, and splice variants. However, we were not able to detect most focal gene amplifications/deletions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Molecular Pathology\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Molecular Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jmp3010006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jmp3010006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:平行测序技术已经融入临床实践。本研究评估了TruSight Tumor 170检测同时检测体细胞基因突变(snp和indes)、基因融合和CNVs的能力,以及其在常规诊断中的应用。方法:先前用验证方法分析的44个福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织样本使用TruSight Tumor 170 assay (Illumina)进行评估。数据分析使用TruSight Tumor 170应用程序、BaseSpace Variant Interpreter (Illumina)和Molecular Health Guide Software (Molecular Health)。结果:所有体细胞基因突变都被检测到。CNV分析检测到两个高水平的MET扩增。拷贝数低于10的焦点MET扩增在dna水平上不可靠地检测到。31个融合和剪接变异体中有21个在rna水平上被证实。其余8个像差用以前的方法是不正确的。2例未观察到剪接。结论:与其他方法相比,即使应用较低的DNA和RNA浓度,TruSight Tumor 170也能提供可靠的结果,并且可用于常规工作流程中检测体细胞基因突变、基因融合和剪接变异。然而,我们无法检测到大多数局灶基因扩增/缺失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the TruSight Tumor 170 Assay and Its Value in Clinical Diagnostics
Background: Parallel sequencing technologies have become integrated into clinical practice. This study evaluated the TruSight Tumor 170 assay for the simultaneous detection of somatic gene mutations (SNPs and indels), gene fusions and CNVs, and its implementation into routine diagnostics. Methods: Forty-four formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples analyzed previously with validated methods were evaluated with the TruSight Tumor 170 assay (Illumina). For data analysis the TruSight Tumor 170 app, the BaseSpace Variant Interpreter (Illumina), and the Molecular Health Guide Software (Molecular Health) were used. Results: All somatic gene mutations were identified when covered by the assay. Two high-level MET amplifications were detected by CNV analysis. Focal MET amplifications with a copy number below 10 were not reliably detected at the DNA-level. Twenty-one of 31 fusions and splice variants were confirmed with the assay on the RNA-level. The remaining eight aberrations were incorrect by previous methods. In two cases, no splicing was observed. Conclusions: The TruSight Tumor 170 gives reliable results even if low DNA and RNA concentrations are applied in comparison to other methods and can be used in a routine workflow to detect somatic gene mutations, gene fusions, and splice variants. However, we were not able to detect most focal gene amplifications/deletions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信