K-12教育工作者如何看待美国教育专业的倡导:一个系统的范围审查

Karen Lauritzen
{"title":"K-12教育工作者如何看待美国教育专业的倡导:一个系统的范围审查","authors":"Karen Lauritzen","doi":"10.46767/kfp.2016-0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many educators in the United States are advocates for the education profession; however, little is known about K-12 perceptions of advocacy. This article systematically scoped the literature on the types of articles that have been written on educator advocacy that include information on teacher perceptions and attitudes. A systematic scoping literature review, combined descriptive synthesis, and textual narrative synthesis were completed. A total of 9,051 articles were identified by the search strategy. Of these, 18 were included for analysis and synthesis. Twelve articles were qualitative, three were mixed methods, and three were quantitative. Articles were categorized according to research objective types, educator population types, and occurring themes. This systematic scoping review revealed gaps in the literature on the subject. Gaps included studies with small sample sizes generally limited to single academic institutions or locations. Additionally, most study results were not generalizable to larger populations, and no studies were written solely to determine educators’ perceptions of advocacy for the education profession. Studies that used quantitative methods had the highest quality and validity, and the highest quality qualitative studies were those that used multiple qualitative methods. Future studies would benefit from focusing on educators’ perceptions of advocacy for the education profession to determine what might motivate educators to be advocates.","PeriodicalId":320807,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interdisciplinary Teacher Leadership","volume":"2007 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How K-12 Educators Perceive Advocacy for the Education Profession in the United States: A Systematic Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Karen Lauritzen\",\"doi\":\"10.46767/kfp.2016-0040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many educators in the United States are advocates for the education profession; however, little is known about K-12 perceptions of advocacy. This article systematically scoped the literature on the types of articles that have been written on educator advocacy that include information on teacher perceptions and attitudes. A systematic scoping literature review, combined descriptive synthesis, and textual narrative synthesis were completed. A total of 9,051 articles were identified by the search strategy. Of these, 18 were included for analysis and synthesis. Twelve articles were qualitative, three were mixed methods, and three were quantitative. Articles were categorized according to research objective types, educator population types, and occurring themes. This systematic scoping review revealed gaps in the literature on the subject. Gaps included studies with small sample sizes generally limited to single academic institutions or locations. Additionally, most study results were not generalizable to larger populations, and no studies were written solely to determine educators’ perceptions of advocacy for the education profession. Studies that used quantitative methods had the highest quality and validity, and the highest quality qualitative studies were those that used multiple qualitative methods. Future studies would benefit from focusing on educators’ perceptions of advocacy for the education profession to determine what might motivate educators to be advocates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":320807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interdisciplinary Teacher Leadership\",\"volume\":\"2007 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interdisciplinary Teacher Leadership\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46767/kfp.2016-0040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interdisciplinary Teacher Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46767/kfp.2016-0040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国的许多教育工作者都是教育行业的倡导者;然而,人们对K-12对倡导的看法知之甚少。本文系统地分析了关于教育者倡导的文章类型的文献,其中包括关于教师观念和态度的信息。完成了系统的文献综述、描述性综合和文本叙事性综合。通过搜索策略共识别出9051篇文章。其中18份纳入分析合成。定性法12篇,混合法3篇,定量法3篇。文章根据研究对象类型、教育人群类型和发生主题进行分类。这个系统的范围审查揭示了关于这个主题的文献中的空白。差距包括通常限于单一学术机构或地点的小样本量研究。此外,大多数研究结果不能推广到更大的人群,也没有研究仅仅是为了确定教育工作者对教育专业倡导的看法。使用定量方法的研究质量和效度最高,而使用多种定性方法的研究质量最高。未来的研究将受益于关注教育工作者对教育专业倡导的看法,以确定什么可能激励教育工作者成为倡导者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How K-12 Educators Perceive Advocacy for the Education Profession in the United States: A Systematic Scoping Review
Many educators in the United States are advocates for the education profession; however, little is known about K-12 perceptions of advocacy. This article systematically scoped the literature on the types of articles that have been written on educator advocacy that include information on teacher perceptions and attitudes. A systematic scoping literature review, combined descriptive synthesis, and textual narrative synthesis were completed. A total of 9,051 articles were identified by the search strategy. Of these, 18 were included for analysis and synthesis. Twelve articles were qualitative, three were mixed methods, and three were quantitative. Articles were categorized according to research objective types, educator population types, and occurring themes. This systematic scoping review revealed gaps in the literature on the subject. Gaps included studies with small sample sizes generally limited to single academic institutions or locations. Additionally, most study results were not generalizable to larger populations, and no studies were written solely to determine educators’ perceptions of advocacy for the education profession. Studies that used quantitative methods had the highest quality and validity, and the highest quality qualitative studies were those that used multiple qualitative methods. Future studies would benefit from focusing on educators’ perceptions of advocacy for the education profession to determine what might motivate educators to be advocates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信