国际私法的非国家化——一个有多个裁判和执行者的法律

D. Arroyo
{"title":"国际私法的非国家化——一个有多个裁判和执行者的法律","authors":"D. Arroyo","doi":"10.9785/9783504386528-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This article proposes a discourse on the denationalization of Private International Law (PrIL), by approaching PrIL as a law with multiple adjudicators and enforcers. Quite evidently, and as powerful as it still may be, the State is nowadays no longer what it used to be . In the realm of PrIL, the central role once played by the State has progressively been eroded. Indeed, the State coexists with other – public and private – actors. Based on that, the study emphasizes that the fabrication and the enforcement, as well as, ultimately, the effectiveness of PrIL considerably depend on different kinds of non-State actors. The proposals to approach the future evolution of PrIL as a tool to foster global governance should not ignore the fundamental role of private adjudication and private enforcement.","PeriodicalId":156607,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook of Private International Law Vol. XX - 2018/2019","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DENATIONALISING PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW – A LAW WITH MULTIPLE ADJUDICATORS AND ENFORCERS\",\"authors\":\"D. Arroyo\",\"doi\":\"10.9785/9783504386528-005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": This article proposes a discourse on the denationalization of Private International Law (PrIL), by approaching PrIL as a law with multiple adjudicators and enforcers. Quite evidently, and as powerful as it still may be, the State is nowadays no longer what it used to be . In the realm of PrIL, the central role once played by the State has progressively been eroded. Indeed, the State coexists with other – public and private – actors. Based on that, the study emphasizes that the fabrication and the enforcement, as well as, ultimately, the effectiveness of PrIL considerably depend on different kinds of non-State actors. The proposals to approach the future evolution of PrIL as a tool to foster global governance should not ignore the fundamental role of private adjudication and private enforcement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":156607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yearbook of Private International Law Vol. XX - 2018/2019\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yearbook of Private International Law Vol. XX - 2018/2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9785/9783504386528-005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook of Private International Law Vol. XX - 2018/2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9785/9783504386528-005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将国际私法视为一种具有多重裁判者和执法者的法律,提出了关于国际私法非国家化的论述。很明显,尽管现在的国家仍然很强大,但它已不再是过去的国家了。在人权领域,国家曾经发挥的中心作用已逐渐被削弱。事实上,国家与其他公共和私人行为者共存。在此基础上,本研究强调,刑法的制定和执行以及最终的有效性在很大程度上取决于不同类型的非国家行为者。关于将刑事司法作为促进全球治理工具的未来演变的建议不应忽视私人裁决和私人执行的基本作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DENATIONALISING PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW – A LAW WITH MULTIPLE ADJUDICATORS AND ENFORCERS
: This article proposes a discourse on the denationalization of Private International Law (PrIL), by approaching PrIL as a law with multiple adjudicators and enforcers. Quite evidently, and as powerful as it still may be, the State is nowadays no longer what it used to be . In the realm of PrIL, the central role once played by the State has progressively been eroded. Indeed, the State coexists with other – public and private – actors. Based on that, the study emphasizes that the fabrication and the enforcement, as well as, ultimately, the effectiveness of PrIL considerably depend on different kinds of non-State actors. The proposals to approach the future evolution of PrIL as a tool to foster global governance should not ignore the fundamental role of private adjudication and private enforcement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信