通过印度尼西亚卫生法中的省级医院监督委员会解决医院纠纷(在日惹省的研究)

Nayla Alawiya, N. Utami, Ulil Afwa
{"title":"通过印度尼西亚卫生法中的省级医院监督委员会解决医院纠纷(在日惹省的研究)","authors":"Nayla Alawiya, N. Utami, Ulil Afwa","doi":"10.20884/1.jdh.2023.23.1.2351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hospitals as health service institutions with legal entities are places that are prone to disputes. Article 60 Law no. 44 of 2009 assigned the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board to receive complaints and make efforts to resolve disputes employing mediation. An analysis of the forms of hospital disputes and their settlement model through the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board is very important to be done to avoid misinterpretation and provide legal certainty about who is the authorized party to handle them. The research method used was normative juridical and empirical juridical. The results of this study are to obtain an analysis of the forms of complaints that can be submitted to the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board including disputes over hospitals as health service facilities where medical personnel and health workers provide health services that are detrimental to patients; disputes between the hospital as a health service facility and the patient as the recipient of health services related to the implementation of the obligations of both parties; disputes between the hospital as a legal entity and the hospital workforce related to internal management; the disputes between hospital as a legal entity and the third parties related to non-medical cooperation; the disputes between hospital as a legal entity and the environment. The hospital dispute resolution model implemented by the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board of Yogyakarta includes the hospital dispute resolution model by the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board in collaboration with hospitals, the Hospital Supervisory Board, Provincial Health Office, Provincial Legal Representatives (Ombudsman), YLKI , and PERSI .","PeriodicalId":280058,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Dinamika Hukum","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hospital Dispute Settlement Through the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board in Indonesian Health Law (A Study in Yogyakarta Province)\",\"authors\":\"Nayla Alawiya, N. Utami, Ulil Afwa\",\"doi\":\"10.20884/1.jdh.2023.23.1.2351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hospitals as health service institutions with legal entities are places that are prone to disputes. Article 60 Law no. 44 of 2009 assigned the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board to receive complaints and make efforts to resolve disputes employing mediation. An analysis of the forms of hospital disputes and their settlement model through the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board is very important to be done to avoid misinterpretation and provide legal certainty about who is the authorized party to handle them. The research method used was normative juridical and empirical juridical. The results of this study are to obtain an analysis of the forms of complaints that can be submitted to the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board including disputes over hospitals as health service facilities where medical personnel and health workers provide health services that are detrimental to patients; disputes between the hospital as a health service facility and the patient as the recipient of health services related to the implementation of the obligations of both parties; disputes between the hospital as a legal entity and the hospital workforce related to internal management; the disputes between hospital as a legal entity and the third parties related to non-medical cooperation; the disputes between hospital as a legal entity and the environment. The hospital dispute resolution model implemented by the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board of Yogyakarta includes the hospital dispute resolution model by the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board in collaboration with hospitals, the Hospital Supervisory Board, Provincial Health Office, Provincial Legal Representatives (Ombudsman), YLKI , and PERSI .\",\"PeriodicalId\":280058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Dinamika Hukum\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Dinamika Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2023.23.1.2351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Dinamika Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2023.23.1.2351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医院作为具有法人资格的卫生服务机构,是容易发生纠纷的场所。第六十条第1号法2009年第44号法令责成省医院监督委员会接受投诉并努力通过调解解决纠纷。通过省医院监事会对医院纠纷的形式及其解决模式进行分析是非常重要的,以避免误解,并为谁是处理这些纠纷的授权方提供法律确定性。研究方法采用规范法和实证法。这项研究的结果是对可向省医院监督委员会提交的投诉形式进行分析,包括对医院作为医疗服务设施的争议,医务人员和卫生工作者提供对患者有害的卫生服务;作为保健服务设施的医院与作为保健服务接受者的病人之间的纠纷涉及双方义务的履行;作为法人的医院与医院职工之间的内部管理纠纷;作为法人的医院与第三方发生的非医疗合作纠纷;医院法人与环境的纠纷。日惹省医院监督委员会实施的医院纠纷解决模式包括省医院监督委员会与医院、医院监督委员会、省卫生厅、省法律代表(监察员)、日惹省医院监督委员会和PERSI合作实施的医院纠纷解决模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hospital Dispute Settlement Through the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board in Indonesian Health Law (A Study in Yogyakarta Province)
Hospitals as health service institutions with legal entities are places that are prone to disputes. Article 60 Law no. 44 of 2009 assigned the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board to receive complaints and make efforts to resolve disputes employing mediation. An analysis of the forms of hospital disputes and their settlement model through the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board is very important to be done to avoid misinterpretation and provide legal certainty about who is the authorized party to handle them. The research method used was normative juridical and empirical juridical. The results of this study are to obtain an analysis of the forms of complaints that can be submitted to the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board including disputes over hospitals as health service facilities where medical personnel and health workers provide health services that are detrimental to patients; disputes between the hospital as a health service facility and the patient as the recipient of health services related to the implementation of the obligations of both parties; disputes between the hospital as a legal entity and the hospital workforce related to internal management; the disputes between hospital as a legal entity and the third parties related to non-medical cooperation; the disputes between hospital as a legal entity and the environment. The hospital dispute resolution model implemented by the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board of Yogyakarta includes the hospital dispute resolution model by the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board in collaboration with hospitals, the Hospital Supervisory Board, Provincial Health Office, Provincial Legal Representatives (Ombudsman), YLKI , and PERSI .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信