霸权的概念

Doru Lung, M. Ball
{"title":"霸权的概念","authors":"Doru Lung, M. Ball","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2961426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is concerned with the concept of hegemony and its applicability to understanding contemporary social and cultural developments. The concept of hegemony as used in social and cultural discourse has its roots in Marxist notions of class, oppression, ideology, base and superstructure, as well as Leninist notions of the vanguard, ​and was further developed by Antonio Gramsci, whose thoughts on cultural hegemony elaborated how one social group gained and then maintained power through cultural institutions, which constituted hegemony, and state institutions, such as the police, courts, and the military, which constituted domination. Adorno and Horkheimer developed a conception of a hegemonic culture industry and showed how the production of standardized cultural products could produce a dulled and docile populace. The concept of hegemony in understanding contemporary social and cultural developments has applicability not only through the thinking of the theorists named above, but also through what can be called a hegemonic discourse, which determines what can be thought, talked about or written, and thus is a concept which even a post-structuralist theorist, such as Foucault, makes use of, and whose applicability to understanding contemporary developments will be illustrated by recent events. The paper is consequently structured as follows: the first section introduces the concept of hegemony; the second section shows the origin of the concept of hegemony in Marxist thinking about ideology, superstructure, and the vanguard; the third section is concerned with Antonio Gramsci’s differentiation between rule, which is exercised directly through political institutions, and hegemony, which is maintained through culture; the fourth section addresses the notion of a culture industry, set forth by Horkheimer and Adorno, which creates mass produced culture for consumption by the masses, and whose function is a dulling of the consciousness of the same; the fifth section shows that the concept of hegemony is present in the thinking of Foucault about discourse; and the final section shows the applicability of the concept of hegemony to understanding recent events and concludes.","PeriodicalId":149082,"journal":{"name":"Continental Philosophy eJournal","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Concept of Hegemony\",\"authors\":\"Doru Lung, M. Ball\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2961426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is concerned with the concept of hegemony and its applicability to understanding contemporary social and cultural developments. The concept of hegemony as used in social and cultural discourse has its roots in Marxist notions of class, oppression, ideology, base and superstructure, as well as Leninist notions of the vanguard, ​and was further developed by Antonio Gramsci, whose thoughts on cultural hegemony elaborated how one social group gained and then maintained power through cultural institutions, which constituted hegemony, and state institutions, such as the police, courts, and the military, which constituted domination. Adorno and Horkheimer developed a conception of a hegemonic culture industry and showed how the production of standardized cultural products could produce a dulled and docile populace. The concept of hegemony in understanding contemporary social and cultural developments has applicability not only through the thinking of the theorists named above, but also through what can be called a hegemonic discourse, which determines what can be thought, talked about or written, and thus is a concept which even a post-structuralist theorist, such as Foucault, makes use of, and whose applicability to understanding contemporary developments will be illustrated by recent events. The paper is consequently structured as follows: the first section introduces the concept of hegemony; the second section shows the origin of the concept of hegemony in Marxist thinking about ideology, superstructure, and the vanguard; the third section is concerned with Antonio Gramsci’s differentiation between rule, which is exercised directly through political institutions, and hegemony, which is maintained through culture; the fourth section addresses the notion of a culture industry, set forth by Horkheimer and Adorno, which creates mass produced culture for consumption by the masses, and whose function is a dulling of the consciousness of the same; the fifth section shows that the concept of hegemony is present in the thinking of Foucault about discourse; and the final section shows the applicability of the concept of hegemony to understanding recent events and concludes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Continental Philosophy eJournal\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Continental Philosophy eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2961426\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continental Philosophy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2961426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文关注霸权的概念及其对理解当代社会文化发展的适用性。社会文化话语中所使用的霸权概念源于马克思主义关于阶级、压迫、意识形态、基础和上层建筑的概念,以及列宁主义关于先锋队的概念,并由安东尼奥·葛兰西进一步发展。葛兰西关于文化霸权的思想阐述了一个社会群体如何通过构成霸权的文化机构以及警察、法院和军队等国家机构获得并保持权力。这就构成了统治。阿多诺和霍克海默发展了霸权文化工业的概念,并展示了标准化文化产品的生产如何产生迟钝和温顺的民众。霸权概念在理解当代社会和文化发展中的适用性,不仅通过上述理论家的思维,而且通过所谓的霸权话语,它决定了什么可以被思考,谈论或写作,因此是一个概念,甚至是一个后结构主义理论家,如福柯,利用,其对理解当代发展的适用性将通过最近的事件来说明。因此,本文的结构如下:第一部分介绍霸权的概念;第二部分阐述了霸权概念在马克思主义意识形态、上层建筑和先锋队思想中的渊源;第三部分关注的是安东尼奥·葛兰西对统治和霸权的区分,前者通过政治制度直接行使,后者通过文化维持;第四部分阐述了霍克海默和阿多诺提出的文化工业的概念,它为大众消费创造了大量生产的文化,其功能是对相同意识的钝化;第五部分表明,霸权概念存在于福柯关于话语的思考中;最后一节展示了霸权概念对理解近期事件的适用性,并得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Concept of Hegemony
This paper is concerned with the concept of hegemony and its applicability to understanding contemporary social and cultural developments. The concept of hegemony as used in social and cultural discourse has its roots in Marxist notions of class, oppression, ideology, base and superstructure, as well as Leninist notions of the vanguard, ​and was further developed by Antonio Gramsci, whose thoughts on cultural hegemony elaborated how one social group gained and then maintained power through cultural institutions, which constituted hegemony, and state institutions, such as the police, courts, and the military, which constituted domination. Adorno and Horkheimer developed a conception of a hegemonic culture industry and showed how the production of standardized cultural products could produce a dulled and docile populace. The concept of hegemony in understanding contemporary social and cultural developments has applicability not only through the thinking of the theorists named above, but also through what can be called a hegemonic discourse, which determines what can be thought, talked about or written, and thus is a concept which even a post-structuralist theorist, such as Foucault, makes use of, and whose applicability to understanding contemporary developments will be illustrated by recent events. The paper is consequently structured as follows: the first section introduces the concept of hegemony; the second section shows the origin of the concept of hegemony in Marxist thinking about ideology, superstructure, and the vanguard; the third section is concerned with Antonio Gramsci’s differentiation between rule, which is exercised directly through political institutions, and hegemony, which is maintained through culture; the fourth section addresses the notion of a culture industry, set forth by Horkheimer and Adorno, which creates mass produced culture for consumption by the masses, and whose function is a dulling of the consciousness of the same; the fifth section shows that the concept of hegemony is present in the thinking of Foucault about discourse; and the final section shows the applicability of the concept of hegemony to understanding recent events and concludes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信