{"title":"非协调有限元离散化时相关Stokes问题的后验误差估计,II:空间估计量的分析","authors":"S. Nicaise, N. Soualem","doi":"10.1515/jnma.2007.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We complete the analysis of our a posteriori error estimators for the time-dependent Stokes problem in Rd , d = 2 or 3. Our analysis covers non-conforming finite element approximation (Crouzeix–Raviart's elements) in space and backward Euler's scheme in time. For this discretization, we derived in part I of this paper [J. Numer. Math. (2007) 15, No. 2, 137–162] a residual indicator, which uses a spatial residual indicator based on the jumps of normal and tangential derivatives of the nonconforming approximation and a time residual indicator based on the jump of broken gradients at each time step. In this second part we prove some analytical tools, and derive the lower and upper bounds of the spatial estimator.","PeriodicalId":342521,"journal":{"name":"J. Num. Math.","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A posteriori error estimates for a nonconforming finite element discretization of the time-dependent Stokes problem, II: Analysis of the spatial estimator\",\"authors\":\"S. Nicaise, N. Soualem\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jnma.2007.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We complete the analysis of our a posteriori error estimators for the time-dependent Stokes problem in Rd , d = 2 or 3. Our analysis covers non-conforming finite element approximation (Crouzeix–Raviart's elements) in space and backward Euler's scheme in time. For this discretization, we derived in part I of this paper [J. Numer. Math. (2007) 15, No. 2, 137–162] a residual indicator, which uses a spatial residual indicator based on the jumps of normal and tangential derivatives of the nonconforming approximation and a time residual indicator based on the jump of broken gradients at each time step. In this second part we prove some analytical tools, and derive the lower and upper bounds of the spatial estimator.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Num. Math.\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Num. Math.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jnma.2007.010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Num. Math.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jnma.2007.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
我们完成了我们的后验误差估计的分析,时间相关的斯托克斯问题在Rd, d = 2或3。我们的分析涵盖了空间上的非协调有限元近似(Crouzeix-Raviart单元)和时间上的向后欧拉格式。对于这种离散化,我们在本文的第一部分中推导出[J]。号码。数学。[2007] [15], No. 2, 137-162]残差指标,该指标使用基于非一致性近似的法向导数和切向导数跳跃的空间残差指标和基于每个时间步的破碎梯度跳跃的时间残差指标。在第二部分中,我们证明了一些分析工具,并推导了空间估计量的下界和上界。
A posteriori error estimates for a nonconforming finite element discretization of the time-dependent Stokes problem, II: Analysis of the spatial estimator
We complete the analysis of our a posteriori error estimators for the time-dependent Stokes problem in Rd , d = 2 or 3. Our analysis covers non-conforming finite element approximation (Crouzeix–Raviart's elements) in space and backward Euler's scheme in time. For this discretization, we derived in part I of this paper [J. Numer. Math. (2007) 15, No. 2, 137–162] a residual indicator, which uses a spatial residual indicator based on the jumps of normal and tangential derivatives of the nonconforming approximation and a time residual indicator based on the jump of broken gradients at each time step. In this second part we prove some analytical tools, and derive the lower and upper bounds of the spatial estimator.