基于深度学习的岩屑岩性自动分类

Takashi Nanjo, Akira Ebitani, Kazuaki Ishikawa, Yusaku Konishi, Keisuke Miyoshi, V. Shulakova, R. Beloborodov, R. Kempton, C. Delle Piane, Michael Benedict Clennell, Arun Sagotra, M. Pervukhina, Yuta Mizutani, Takuya Harada
{"title":"基于深度学习的岩屑岩性自动分类","authors":"Takashi Nanjo, Akira Ebitani, Kazuaki Ishikawa, Yusaku Konishi, Keisuke Miyoshi, V. Shulakova, R. Beloborodov, R. Kempton, C. Delle Piane, Michael Benedict Clennell, Arun Sagotra, M. Pervukhina, Yuta Mizutani, Takuya Harada","doi":"10.2523/iptc-22867-ea","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Describing cuttings is routine work for wellsite geologists on a drill rig. The time-consuming nature of this analysis and the lack of consistency of the results between different interpreters are the two major concerns for this task. Wellsite geologists spend approximately 70% of their time on cuttings descriptions. In addition, 2 to 3 wellsite geologists are generally assigned to a drilling campaign, and they are replaced at the end of a shift. ML/AI techniques have the potential to solve these issues because of their advantages in prediction speed, objectivity, and consistency. The authors’ aim is to automate the task of cuttings descriptions with ML/AI techniques.\n We are targeting four lithologies, namely sandstone, mudstone, volcanic (volcanic rocks), and carbonate (carbonate rocks). The cuttings were collected from six wells in the Browse Basin (Australia). Of these four lithologies, a total of 1978 cuttings images were taken under a stereomicroscope.\n We chose a semantic segmentation technique using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) algorithms to perform the image classification task. The images were labelled using the open-source annotation software. This annotated data were used for the network training. The labelled images were split into training, validation, and test sets.\n The accuracy of the trained model was evaluated using the intersection-over-union metric (IOU). The mean IOU of the final model on the validation dataset was 82.3%. Prediction results on the cuttings that are represented by single lithologies are qualitatively very accurate. On the other hand, the prediction for the non-typical lithology (e.g., siltstone, dark-colored volcanic rocks, mixed lithology samples) has room for improvement. The fragments with similar textures (e.g., dark colored volcanic and dark mudstone) are complex for the CNN to identify. The final goal of our project is not only the lithology identification but also the quantitative estimation of lithology abundances in the cuttings. Additional model improvements, such as hyperparameter optimization and significantly more training data, are required to accomplish this task successfully.\n The trained model for cuttings description has the potential to realize quantitative and high-speed cuttings description. Well-trained AI/ML models have the potential to assist well site geologists by automating the cuttings description process simplifying, speeding up and improving the consistency on the rig floor.","PeriodicalId":153269,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Thu, March 02, 2023","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automatic Lithology Classification of Cuttings with Deep Learning\",\"authors\":\"Takashi Nanjo, Akira Ebitani, Kazuaki Ishikawa, Yusaku Konishi, Keisuke Miyoshi, V. Shulakova, R. Beloborodov, R. Kempton, C. Delle Piane, Michael Benedict Clennell, Arun Sagotra, M. Pervukhina, Yuta Mizutani, Takuya Harada\",\"doi\":\"10.2523/iptc-22867-ea\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Describing cuttings is routine work for wellsite geologists on a drill rig. The time-consuming nature of this analysis and the lack of consistency of the results between different interpreters are the two major concerns for this task. Wellsite geologists spend approximately 70% of their time on cuttings descriptions. In addition, 2 to 3 wellsite geologists are generally assigned to a drilling campaign, and they are replaced at the end of a shift. ML/AI techniques have the potential to solve these issues because of their advantages in prediction speed, objectivity, and consistency. The authors’ aim is to automate the task of cuttings descriptions with ML/AI techniques.\\n We are targeting four lithologies, namely sandstone, mudstone, volcanic (volcanic rocks), and carbonate (carbonate rocks). The cuttings were collected from six wells in the Browse Basin (Australia). Of these four lithologies, a total of 1978 cuttings images were taken under a stereomicroscope.\\n We chose a semantic segmentation technique using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) algorithms to perform the image classification task. The images were labelled using the open-source annotation software. This annotated data were used for the network training. The labelled images were split into training, validation, and test sets.\\n The accuracy of the trained model was evaluated using the intersection-over-union metric (IOU). The mean IOU of the final model on the validation dataset was 82.3%. Prediction results on the cuttings that are represented by single lithologies are qualitatively very accurate. On the other hand, the prediction for the non-typical lithology (e.g., siltstone, dark-colored volcanic rocks, mixed lithology samples) has room for improvement. The fragments with similar textures (e.g., dark colored volcanic and dark mudstone) are complex for the CNN to identify. The final goal of our project is not only the lithology identification but also the quantitative estimation of lithology abundances in the cuttings. Additional model improvements, such as hyperparameter optimization and significantly more training data, are required to accomplish this task successfully.\\n The trained model for cuttings description has the potential to realize quantitative and high-speed cuttings description. Well-trained AI/ML models have the potential to assist well site geologists by automating the cuttings description process simplifying, speeding up and improving the consistency on the rig floor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Thu, March 02, 2023\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Thu, March 02, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22867-ea\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Thu, March 02, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22867-ea","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

描述岩屑是钻井现场地质学家的日常工作。这种分析的耗时性质和不同口译员之间的结果缺乏一致性是这项任务的两个主要问题。井场地质学家将大约70%的时间用于岩屑描述。此外,每次钻井作业通常会分配2到3名井场地质学家,并在轮班结束时更换他们。ML/AI技术具有解决这些问题的潜力,因为它们在预测速度、客观性和一致性方面具有优势。作者的目标是用ML/AI技术自动化切割描述任务。我们的目标是四种岩性,即砂岩、泥岩、火山岩和碳酸盐岩。岩屑是从Browse盆地(澳大利亚)的6口井中收集的。在这四种岩性中,在立体显微镜下共拍摄了1978张岩屑图像。我们选择了使用卷积神经网络(CNN)算法的语义分割技术来执行图像分类任务。使用开源注释软件对图像进行标记。这些标注的数据用于网络训练。标记后的图像被分成训练集、验证集和测试集。利用交叉-超并度量(intersection-over-union metric, IOU)对训练模型的精度进行了评价。最终模型在验证数据集上的平均IOU为82.3%。以单一岩性为代表的岩屑预测结果在定性上非常准确。另一方面,非典型岩性(如粉砂岩、深色火山岩、混合岩性样品)的预测仍有改进空间。纹理相似的碎片(如深色火山岩和深色泥岩)对于CNN来说识别起来比较复杂。该项目的最终目标不仅是岩性识别,而且是岩屑岩性丰度的定量估计。要成功完成这项任务,还需要额外的模型改进,例如超参数优化和大量的训练数据。训练后的岩屑描述模型具有实现岩屑定量、高速描述的潜力。训练有素的AI/ML模型有可能通过自动化岩屑描述过程来帮助井场地质学家,简化、加速和提高钻台的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automatic Lithology Classification of Cuttings with Deep Learning
Describing cuttings is routine work for wellsite geologists on a drill rig. The time-consuming nature of this analysis and the lack of consistency of the results between different interpreters are the two major concerns for this task. Wellsite geologists spend approximately 70% of their time on cuttings descriptions. In addition, 2 to 3 wellsite geologists are generally assigned to a drilling campaign, and they are replaced at the end of a shift. ML/AI techniques have the potential to solve these issues because of their advantages in prediction speed, objectivity, and consistency. The authors’ aim is to automate the task of cuttings descriptions with ML/AI techniques. We are targeting four lithologies, namely sandstone, mudstone, volcanic (volcanic rocks), and carbonate (carbonate rocks). The cuttings were collected from six wells in the Browse Basin (Australia). Of these four lithologies, a total of 1978 cuttings images were taken under a stereomicroscope. We chose a semantic segmentation technique using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) algorithms to perform the image classification task. The images were labelled using the open-source annotation software. This annotated data were used for the network training. The labelled images were split into training, validation, and test sets. The accuracy of the trained model was evaluated using the intersection-over-union metric (IOU). The mean IOU of the final model on the validation dataset was 82.3%. Prediction results on the cuttings that are represented by single lithologies are qualitatively very accurate. On the other hand, the prediction for the non-typical lithology (e.g., siltstone, dark-colored volcanic rocks, mixed lithology samples) has room for improvement. The fragments with similar textures (e.g., dark colored volcanic and dark mudstone) are complex for the CNN to identify. The final goal of our project is not only the lithology identification but also the quantitative estimation of lithology abundances in the cuttings. Additional model improvements, such as hyperparameter optimization and significantly more training data, are required to accomplish this task successfully. The trained model for cuttings description has the potential to realize quantitative and high-speed cuttings description. Well-trained AI/ML models have the potential to assist well site geologists by automating the cuttings description process simplifying, speeding up and improving the consistency on the rig floor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信