努力解决南非的宗教差异:宗教权利宪章草案

P. Coertzen
{"title":"努力解决南非的宗教差异:宗教权利宪章草案","authors":"P. Coertzen","doi":"10.4324/9781315091990-20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I. Introduction Prior to the end of apartheid in 1994 and the adoption of its new constitution in 1996, South Africa lacked any constitutional guarantee of religious freedom.1 Not surprisingly, South Africa's history is replete with examples of state interference in religious matters.2 The 1996 Constitution was the first in South Africa's long history to address the problem of religious freedom and, specifically, state interference in religion. It provides an explicit guarantee of freedom of religion.3 Nevertheless, this new constitutional right is not well-defined. This article argues that religious organizations in South African civil society should take advantage of a provision in South Africa's 1996 Constitution allowing for Parliament to adopt Charters of Rights which are consistent with the Constitution, by proposing a Charter of Religious Rights for South Africa.4 Adopting such a Charter would ensure that South Africa does not repeat its history in allowing its government to define the meaning and scope of fundamental rights such as reugious freedom. Part II of this Article recounts the history of religious freedom in South Africa, with a special focus on how the state has involved itself in defining and limiting that right. Part III focuses on religious freedom and church-state relations following the official end of apartheid in 1994. The current state of religious freedom and church-state relations is discussed in Part IV, and then Part V discusses a proposed Charter for Religious Freedom and makes the case for the charter's adoption. The Charter is attached as an addendum to this Article. Finally, Part VI offers a brief conclusion. II. CHURCH AND STATE IN SOUTH AFRICA: RELIGIOUS RIGHTS BEFORE 1994 In 1652, the Cape-which is now Cape Town-was established as a refreshment post by the Dutch East Indian Company.5 It remained as such until 1795 when the Cape was taken into custody by the British. In 1806 it became a British colony. In 1910, selfgovernment was given to the country,6 and in 1960 South Africa became a Republic under the government of the National Party. In 1994, after the dismantling of apartheid, South Africa became a democratic constitutional state with a constitution that guaranteed freedom of religion for the first time.7 A. Church-State Relations in South Africa: 1652-1795 When the Dutch East India Company established a refreshment post in South Africa in 1652, they brought with them the reformed faith of the Dutch Reformed Church,8 which was a public, statecontrolled church in the Netherlands.9 Those who brought the Dutch Reformed Church to South Africa brought with it a Constantinian, or Erastian, view of the relationship between church and state. The Constantinian model for the relationship between church and state is positive about the role that religion should play in society. It takes the view that society should serve the Triune God and that Christianity should provide direction to society. As John Hiemstra argues: The basic structure proposed by the Constantinian model is that political authorities are understood to be dominant over church authorities. Firstly, this means political authorities often assist, influence, and sometimes fully control church authority. Secondly, the state's role includes advancing and supporting 'true religion' through the use of its coercive power.10 The Constantinian perspective has been very strong in the Reformed Churches of the Netherlands since the sixteenth century and has also played a very strong role in England since the time of Henry VIII. As far as the Reformed Churches are concerned, the Constantinian model of church-state relations found expression in the old wordings of the Confessio Belgica (The Dutch Confession of Faith): And the government's task is not limited to caring for and watching over the public domain but extends also to upholding the sacred ministry, with a view to removing and destroying all idolatry and false worship of the Antichrist; to promoting the Kingdom of Jesus Christ; and to furthering the preaching of the gospel everywhere; to the end that God May be honored and served by everyone, as he requires in His Word. …","PeriodicalId":142428,"journal":{"name":"BYU Law Review","volume":"2006 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grappling with Religious Differences in South Africa: A Draft for a Charter of Religious Rights\",\"authors\":\"P. Coertzen\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315091990-20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I. Introduction Prior to the end of apartheid in 1994 and the adoption of its new constitution in 1996, South Africa lacked any constitutional guarantee of religious freedom.1 Not surprisingly, South Africa's history is replete with examples of state interference in religious matters.2 The 1996 Constitution was the first in South Africa's long history to address the problem of religious freedom and, specifically, state interference in religion. It provides an explicit guarantee of freedom of religion.3 Nevertheless, this new constitutional right is not well-defined. This article argues that religious organizations in South African civil society should take advantage of a provision in South Africa's 1996 Constitution allowing for Parliament to adopt Charters of Rights which are consistent with the Constitution, by proposing a Charter of Religious Rights for South Africa.4 Adopting such a Charter would ensure that South Africa does not repeat its history in allowing its government to define the meaning and scope of fundamental rights such as reugious freedom. Part II of this Article recounts the history of religious freedom in South Africa, with a special focus on how the state has involved itself in defining and limiting that right. Part III focuses on religious freedom and church-state relations following the official end of apartheid in 1994. The current state of religious freedom and church-state relations is discussed in Part IV, and then Part V discusses a proposed Charter for Religious Freedom and makes the case for the charter's adoption. The Charter is attached as an addendum to this Article. Finally, Part VI offers a brief conclusion. II. CHURCH AND STATE IN SOUTH AFRICA: RELIGIOUS RIGHTS BEFORE 1994 In 1652, the Cape-which is now Cape Town-was established as a refreshment post by the Dutch East Indian Company.5 It remained as such until 1795 when the Cape was taken into custody by the British. In 1806 it became a British colony. In 1910, selfgovernment was given to the country,6 and in 1960 South Africa became a Republic under the government of the National Party. In 1994, after the dismantling of apartheid, South Africa became a democratic constitutional state with a constitution that guaranteed freedom of religion for the first time.7 A. Church-State Relations in South Africa: 1652-1795 When the Dutch East India Company established a refreshment post in South Africa in 1652, they brought with them the reformed faith of the Dutch Reformed Church,8 which was a public, statecontrolled church in the Netherlands.9 Those who brought the Dutch Reformed Church to South Africa brought with it a Constantinian, or Erastian, view of the relationship between church and state. The Constantinian model for the relationship between church and state is positive about the role that religion should play in society. It takes the view that society should serve the Triune God and that Christianity should provide direction to society. As John Hiemstra argues: The basic structure proposed by the Constantinian model is that political authorities are understood to be dominant over church authorities. Firstly, this means political authorities often assist, influence, and sometimes fully control church authority. Secondly, the state's role includes advancing and supporting 'true religion' through the use of its coercive power.10 The Constantinian perspective has been very strong in the Reformed Churches of the Netherlands since the sixteenth century and has also played a very strong role in England since the time of Henry VIII. As far as the Reformed Churches are concerned, the Constantinian model of church-state relations found expression in the old wordings of the Confessio Belgica (The Dutch Confession of Faith): And the government's task is not limited to caring for and watching over the public domain but extends also to upholding the sacred ministry, with a view to removing and destroying all idolatry and false worship of the Antichrist; to promoting the Kingdom of Jesus Christ; and to furthering the preaching of the gospel everywhere; to the end that God May be honored and served by everyone, as he requires in His Word. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":142428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BYU Law Review\",\"volume\":\"2006 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BYU Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315091990-20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BYU Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315091990-20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在1994年种族隔离结束和1996年通过新宪法之前,南非缺乏任何宪法对宗教自由的保障毫不奇怪,南非的历史上充满了国家干预宗教事务的例子1996年的宪法是南非漫长历史上第一部解决宗教自由问题,特别是国家干预宗教问题的宪法。它明确保证宗教自由然而,这一新的宪法权利并没有明确定义。本文认为,南非民间社会的宗教组织应利用南非1996年《宪法》中的一项规定,该规定允许议会通过符合《宪法》的《权利宪章》。通过这样一份《宪章》将确保南非不再重复其历史,即允许其政府界定宗教自由等基本权利的含义和范围。本文的第二部分叙述了南非宗教自由的历史,特别关注国家如何参与定义和限制这一权利。第三部分着重于1994年种族隔离正式结束后的宗教自由和政教关系。第四部分讨论了宗教自由和政教关系的现状,然后第五部分讨论了拟议的《宗教自由宪章》,并提出了通过该宪章的理由。《宪章》作为本条的增编附后。最后,第六部分是一个简短的结论。2南非的教会与国家:1994年以前的宗教权利1652年,荷兰东印度公司建立了开普角,即现在的开普敦,作为一个茶点,直到1795年开普角被英国人接管。1806年,它成为英国的殖民地。1910年,南非获得了自治权。1960年,南非成为国民党政府领导下的共和国。1994年,在种族隔离制度被废除后,南非成为一个民主宪政国家,宪法第一次保障宗教自由一个。当荷兰东印度公司于1652年在南非建立了一个茶点时,他们带来了荷兰归正教会的改革信仰,8这是荷兰的一个公共的,国家控制的教会。9将荷兰归正教会带到南非的人带来了君士坦丁式的,或伊拉斯式的,关于教会与国家关系的观点。君士坦丁的政教关系模式对于宗教在社会中应该扮演的角色是积极的。它认为社会应该侍奉三位一体的上帝,基督教应该为社会提供方向。正如约翰·希姆斯特拉所说:君士坦丁模式提出的基本结构是,政治权威被理解为高于教会权威。首先,这意味着政治权威经常协助、影响,有时甚至完全控制教会权威。其次,国家的角色包括通过使用其强制性权力来推进和支持“真正的宗教”自16世纪以来,君士坦丁的观点在荷兰的归正教会中非常盛行,在亨利八世时期的英格兰也非常盛行。就改革宗教会而言,君士坦丁式的政教关系模式在《荷兰信仰告白》(Confessio Belgica)的旧措辞中得到了体现:政府的任务不仅限于关心和监督公共领域,而且还延伸到维护神圣的事工,以消除和摧毁一切偶像崇拜和对敌基督的虚假崇拜;宣扬耶稣基督的国;并且在各处传扬福音。好叫神被众人尊荣事奉,正如他在圣经上所吩咐的。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Grappling with Religious Differences in South Africa: A Draft for a Charter of Religious Rights
I. Introduction Prior to the end of apartheid in 1994 and the adoption of its new constitution in 1996, South Africa lacked any constitutional guarantee of religious freedom.1 Not surprisingly, South Africa's history is replete with examples of state interference in religious matters.2 The 1996 Constitution was the first in South Africa's long history to address the problem of religious freedom and, specifically, state interference in religion. It provides an explicit guarantee of freedom of religion.3 Nevertheless, this new constitutional right is not well-defined. This article argues that religious organizations in South African civil society should take advantage of a provision in South Africa's 1996 Constitution allowing for Parliament to adopt Charters of Rights which are consistent with the Constitution, by proposing a Charter of Religious Rights for South Africa.4 Adopting such a Charter would ensure that South Africa does not repeat its history in allowing its government to define the meaning and scope of fundamental rights such as reugious freedom. Part II of this Article recounts the history of religious freedom in South Africa, with a special focus on how the state has involved itself in defining and limiting that right. Part III focuses on religious freedom and church-state relations following the official end of apartheid in 1994. The current state of religious freedom and church-state relations is discussed in Part IV, and then Part V discusses a proposed Charter for Religious Freedom and makes the case for the charter's adoption. The Charter is attached as an addendum to this Article. Finally, Part VI offers a brief conclusion. II. CHURCH AND STATE IN SOUTH AFRICA: RELIGIOUS RIGHTS BEFORE 1994 In 1652, the Cape-which is now Cape Town-was established as a refreshment post by the Dutch East Indian Company.5 It remained as such until 1795 when the Cape was taken into custody by the British. In 1806 it became a British colony. In 1910, selfgovernment was given to the country,6 and in 1960 South Africa became a Republic under the government of the National Party. In 1994, after the dismantling of apartheid, South Africa became a democratic constitutional state with a constitution that guaranteed freedom of religion for the first time.7 A. Church-State Relations in South Africa: 1652-1795 When the Dutch East India Company established a refreshment post in South Africa in 1652, they brought with them the reformed faith of the Dutch Reformed Church,8 which was a public, statecontrolled church in the Netherlands.9 Those who brought the Dutch Reformed Church to South Africa brought with it a Constantinian, or Erastian, view of the relationship between church and state. The Constantinian model for the relationship between church and state is positive about the role that religion should play in society. It takes the view that society should serve the Triune God and that Christianity should provide direction to society. As John Hiemstra argues: The basic structure proposed by the Constantinian model is that political authorities are understood to be dominant over church authorities. Firstly, this means political authorities often assist, influence, and sometimes fully control church authority. Secondly, the state's role includes advancing and supporting 'true religion' through the use of its coercive power.10 The Constantinian perspective has been very strong in the Reformed Churches of the Netherlands since the sixteenth century and has also played a very strong role in England since the time of Henry VIII. As far as the Reformed Churches are concerned, the Constantinian model of church-state relations found expression in the old wordings of the Confessio Belgica (The Dutch Confession of Faith): And the government's task is not limited to caring for and watching over the public domain but extends also to upholding the sacred ministry, with a view to removing and destroying all idolatry and false worship of the Antichrist; to promoting the Kingdom of Jesus Christ; and to furthering the preaching of the gospel everywhere; to the end that God May be honored and served by everyone, as he requires in His Word. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信