紧急转介到伦敦儿科牙科急诊科服务:大流行后我们在哪里?

Divya Pathak, S. Mamdani, N. Bhujel
{"title":"紧急转介到伦敦儿科牙科急诊科服务:大流行后我们在哪里?","authors":"Divya Pathak, S. Mamdani, N. Bhujel","doi":"10.1308/rcsfdj.2023.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paediatric dentistry department at St Thomas’ Hospital transformed its walk-in emergency service to an urgent dental centre during the COVID-19 pandemic, accepting referrals via the NHS 111 service. There are conflicting ethical duties for tertiary care clinicians managing paediatric dental patients. This study measured the current activity levels of the dental emergency service at St Thomas’ Hospital, the appropriateness of NHS 111 referrals, the proportion of referrals accepted for care and the outcomes of those accepted referrals. A retrospective service evaluation was undertaken including 125 patients referred by the NHS 111 service to the dental emergency clinic at St Thomas’ Hospital between 1 September and 29 October 2021. Half (50%) of the patients seen were aged between 0 and 5 years. A quarter (24%) of referrals were true dental emergencies. Patients were referred for isolated dental pain (58%), facial swelling (25%), trauma (13%), broken fillings (3%) and other conditions (2%). Three-quarters (74%) were accepted for treatment. Most accepted patients were added to waiting lists for treatment under general anaesthesia (66%), local anaesthesia (5%) or inhalation sedation (4%). Two-thirds of accepted patients (67%) were not registered with a dentist while over three-quarters of rejected patients (79%) had their own dentist in primary care. Following the pandemic, paediatric dental emergency services continue to be overwhelmed by children requiring non-urgent dental care. Solutions to deteriorating patient access are crucial, ensuring that provision of care remains ethical and that those who require urgent dental care are prioritised.","PeriodicalId":342721,"journal":{"name":"Faculty Dental Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency referrals to a paediatric dental A&E service in London: where do we stand post-pandemic?\",\"authors\":\"Divya Pathak, S. Mamdani, N. Bhujel\",\"doi\":\"10.1308/rcsfdj.2023.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paediatric dentistry department at St Thomas’ Hospital transformed its walk-in emergency service to an urgent dental centre during the COVID-19 pandemic, accepting referrals via the NHS 111 service. There are conflicting ethical duties for tertiary care clinicians managing paediatric dental patients. This study measured the current activity levels of the dental emergency service at St Thomas’ Hospital, the appropriateness of NHS 111 referrals, the proportion of referrals accepted for care and the outcomes of those accepted referrals. A retrospective service evaluation was undertaken including 125 patients referred by the NHS 111 service to the dental emergency clinic at St Thomas’ Hospital between 1 September and 29 October 2021. Half (50%) of the patients seen were aged between 0 and 5 years. A quarter (24%) of referrals were true dental emergencies. Patients were referred for isolated dental pain (58%), facial swelling (25%), trauma (13%), broken fillings (3%) and other conditions (2%). Three-quarters (74%) were accepted for treatment. Most accepted patients were added to waiting lists for treatment under general anaesthesia (66%), local anaesthesia (5%) or inhalation sedation (4%). Two-thirds of accepted patients (67%) were not registered with a dentist while over three-quarters of rejected patients (79%) had their own dentist in primary care. Following the pandemic, paediatric dental emergency services continue to be overwhelmed by children requiring non-urgent dental care. Solutions to deteriorating patient access are crucial, ensuring that provision of care remains ethical and that those who require urgent dental care are prioritised.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Faculty Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Faculty Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsfdj.2023.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Faculty Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsfdj.2023.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,圣托马斯医院的儿科牙科部门将其免预约急诊服务转变为紧急牙科中心,通过NHS 111服务接受转诊。三级保健临床医生管理儿科牙科患者的道德责任存在冲突。本研究测量了圣托马斯医院牙科急诊服务的当前活动水平,NHS 111转诊的适当性,接受转诊的比例以及接受转诊的结果。对2021年9月1日至10月29日期间由NHS 111服务转到圣托马斯医院牙科急诊诊所的125名患者进行了回顾性服务评估。半数(50%)患者年龄在0 - 5岁之间。四分之一(24%)的转诊是真正的牙科紧急情况。患者因孤立性牙痛(58%)、面部肿胀(25%)、外伤(13%)、填充物破损(3%)和其他情况(2%)就诊。四分之三(74%)接受治疗。大多数被接受的患者被添加到等待全麻(66%)、局部麻醉(5%)或吸入镇静(4%)治疗的名单中。三分之二被接受的患者(67%)没有在牙医那里注册,而超过四分之三被拒绝的患者(79%)在初级保健中有自己的牙医。大流行之后,需要非紧急牙科护理的儿童继续使儿科牙科急诊服务不堪重负。解决日益恶化的患者可及性至关重要,要确保提供护理合乎道德,并优先考虑需要紧急牙科护理的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emergency referrals to a paediatric dental A&E service in London: where do we stand post-pandemic?
The paediatric dentistry department at St Thomas’ Hospital transformed its walk-in emergency service to an urgent dental centre during the COVID-19 pandemic, accepting referrals via the NHS 111 service. There are conflicting ethical duties for tertiary care clinicians managing paediatric dental patients. This study measured the current activity levels of the dental emergency service at St Thomas’ Hospital, the appropriateness of NHS 111 referrals, the proportion of referrals accepted for care and the outcomes of those accepted referrals. A retrospective service evaluation was undertaken including 125 patients referred by the NHS 111 service to the dental emergency clinic at St Thomas’ Hospital between 1 September and 29 October 2021. Half (50%) of the patients seen were aged between 0 and 5 years. A quarter (24%) of referrals were true dental emergencies. Patients were referred for isolated dental pain (58%), facial swelling (25%), trauma (13%), broken fillings (3%) and other conditions (2%). Three-quarters (74%) were accepted for treatment. Most accepted patients were added to waiting lists for treatment under general anaesthesia (66%), local anaesthesia (5%) or inhalation sedation (4%). Two-thirds of accepted patients (67%) were not registered with a dentist while over three-quarters of rejected patients (79%) had their own dentist in primary care. Following the pandemic, paediatric dental emergency services continue to be overwhelmed by children requiring non-urgent dental care. Solutions to deteriorating patient access are crucial, ensuring that provision of care remains ethical and that those who require urgent dental care are prioritised.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信