列表神经排序模型

Razieh Rahimi, Ali Montazeralghaem, J. Allan
{"title":"列表神经排序模型","authors":"Razieh Rahimi, Ali Montazeralghaem, J. Allan","doi":"10.1145/3341981.3344245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several neural networks have been developed for end-to-end training of information retrieval models. These networks differ in many aspects including architecture, training data, data representations, and loss functions. However, only pointwise and pairwise loss functions are employed in training of end-to-end neural ranking models without human-engineered features. These loss functions do not consider the ranks of documents in the estimation of loss over training data. Because of this limitation, conventional learning-to-rank models using pointwise or pairwise loss functions have generally shown lower performance compared to those using listwise loss functions. Following this observation, we propose to employ listwise loss functions for the training of neural ranking models. We empirically demonstrate that a listwise neural ranker outperforms a pairwise neural ranking model. In addition, we achieve further improvements in the performance of the listwise neural ranking models by query-based sampling of training data.","PeriodicalId":173154,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Listwise Neural Ranking Models\",\"authors\":\"Razieh Rahimi, Ali Montazeralghaem, J. Allan\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3341981.3344245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several neural networks have been developed for end-to-end training of information retrieval models. These networks differ in many aspects including architecture, training data, data representations, and loss functions. However, only pointwise and pairwise loss functions are employed in training of end-to-end neural ranking models without human-engineered features. These loss functions do not consider the ranks of documents in the estimation of loss over training data. Because of this limitation, conventional learning-to-rank models using pointwise or pairwise loss functions have generally shown lower performance compared to those using listwise loss functions. Following this observation, we propose to employ listwise loss functions for the training of neural ranking models. We empirically demonstrate that a listwise neural ranker outperforms a pairwise neural ranking model. In addition, we achieve further improvements in the performance of the listwise neural ranking models by query-based sampling of training data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":173154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3341981.3344245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3341981.3344245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

一些神经网络已经被开发出来用于信息检索模型的端到端训练。这些网络在很多方面不同,包括体系结构、训练数据、数据表示和损失函数。然而,在没有人为工程特征的端到端神经排序模型的训练中,只使用点损失函数和成对损失函数。这些损失函数在估计训练数据的损失时不考虑文档的等级。由于这种限制,使用点或成对损失函数的传统学习排序模型通常比使用列表损失函数的模型表现出更低的性能。根据这一观察结果,我们建议使用列表损失函数来训练神经排序模型。我们通过经验证明,列表神经排序器优于成对神经排序模型。此外,我们通过对训练数据进行基于查询的采样,进一步提高了列表神经排序模型的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Listwise Neural Ranking Models
Several neural networks have been developed for end-to-end training of information retrieval models. These networks differ in many aspects including architecture, training data, data representations, and loss functions. However, only pointwise and pairwise loss functions are employed in training of end-to-end neural ranking models without human-engineered features. These loss functions do not consider the ranks of documents in the estimation of loss over training data. Because of this limitation, conventional learning-to-rank models using pointwise or pairwise loss functions have generally shown lower performance compared to those using listwise loss functions. Following this observation, we propose to employ listwise loss functions for the training of neural ranking models. We empirically demonstrate that a listwise neural ranker outperforms a pairwise neural ranking model. In addition, we achieve further improvements in the performance of the listwise neural ranking models by query-based sampling of training data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信