共同基础:共同创造城市底层的愿景

In Commons Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.35483/acsa.am.111.58
Christopher A. Roach, Julia Grinkrug
{"title":"共同基础:共同创造城市底层的愿景","authors":"Christopher A. Roach, Julia Grinkrug","doi":"10.35483/acsa.am.111.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What do we share in common among each other and what are the [un]common experiences and identities that must be considered and preserved? Can a common ground be established in pursuit of uncommon needs that mark the divergent missions of various interest groups? Is there even a possibility for the “commons” in our radicalized, alienated, co-opted, gentrified, and post-truth world? These are some of the questions that occupied a group of academic practitioners from Urban Works Agency at California College of the Arts through a series of courses and research projects that revolved around the enigmatic topic of the commons. In this paper, we will unpack the most recent investigations and discoveries that emerged from three consecutive urban design studios focusing on the ground floor of the city as the datum upon which the urban commons can emerge or be reclaimed. At the conception of this three-year project, we were searching for overarching principles or codes for commoning, learning from worldwide precedents, where public space was generated as a common good. As the research evolved in close dialogue with community partners, it became more and more clear that the notion of “common good” as a homogeneous abstraction was a fiction, just like the notion of a generic “public”. Instead, the commons should be seen as an emergent amalgamation of agonistic desires, practices and capacities that is meaningful only as long as it maintains its heterogeneity.","PeriodicalId":243862,"journal":{"name":"In Commons","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Un]Common Ground: Co-Creating the Vision for the City’s Ground Floor\",\"authors\":\"Christopher A. Roach, Julia Grinkrug\",\"doi\":\"10.35483/acsa.am.111.58\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What do we share in common among each other and what are the [un]common experiences and identities that must be considered and preserved? Can a common ground be established in pursuit of uncommon needs that mark the divergent missions of various interest groups? Is there even a possibility for the “commons” in our radicalized, alienated, co-opted, gentrified, and post-truth world? These are some of the questions that occupied a group of academic practitioners from Urban Works Agency at California College of the Arts through a series of courses and research projects that revolved around the enigmatic topic of the commons. In this paper, we will unpack the most recent investigations and discoveries that emerged from three consecutive urban design studios focusing on the ground floor of the city as the datum upon which the urban commons can emerge or be reclaimed. At the conception of this three-year project, we were searching for overarching principles or codes for commoning, learning from worldwide precedents, where public space was generated as a common good. As the research evolved in close dialogue with community partners, it became more and more clear that the notion of “common good” as a homogeneous abstraction was a fiction, just like the notion of a generic “public”. Instead, the commons should be seen as an emergent amalgamation of agonistic desires, practices and capacities that is meaningful only as long as it maintains its heterogeneity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"In Commons\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"In Commons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35483/acsa.am.111.58\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In Commons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35483/acsa.am.111.58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们彼此之间有什么共同之处?有什么[非]共同的经历和身份必须被考虑和保护?在追求标志着不同利益集团不同使命的不寻常需求时,能否建立一个共同基础?在我们这个激进的、异化的、增选的、士绅化的、后真相的世界里,“公地”有可能存在吗?这些都是加州艺术学院城市工程局的一群学术实践者通过一系列课程和研究项目所面临的一些问题,这些课程和研究项目围绕着公地这个神秘的话题。在本文中,我们将揭示最近的调查和发现,这些调查和发现来自三个连续的城市设计工作室,这些工作室专注于城市的底层,作为城市公共空间可以出现或被回收的基准。在这个为期三年的项目的概念中,我们一直在寻找共同的总体原则或准则,从世界各地的先例中学习,在这些先例中,公共空间被作为一种共同的利益而产生。随着研究在与社区伙伴的密切对话中不断发展,越来越清楚的是,“共同利益”的概念作为一种同质的抽象概念是一种虚构,就像一般的“公共”概念一样。相反,公地应该被看作是竞争欲望、实践和能力的新兴融合,只有当它保持其异质性时才有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Un]Common Ground: Co-Creating the Vision for the City’s Ground Floor
What do we share in common among each other and what are the [un]common experiences and identities that must be considered and preserved? Can a common ground be established in pursuit of uncommon needs that mark the divergent missions of various interest groups? Is there even a possibility for the “commons” in our radicalized, alienated, co-opted, gentrified, and post-truth world? These are some of the questions that occupied a group of academic practitioners from Urban Works Agency at California College of the Arts through a series of courses and research projects that revolved around the enigmatic topic of the commons. In this paper, we will unpack the most recent investigations and discoveries that emerged from three consecutive urban design studios focusing on the ground floor of the city as the datum upon which the urban commons can emerge or be reclaimed. At the conception of this three-year project, we were searching for overarching principles or codes for commoning, learning from worldwide precedents, where public space was generated as a common good. As the research evolved in close dialogue with community partners, it became more and more clear that the notion of “common good” as a homogeneous abstraction was a fiction, just like the notion of a generic “public”. Instead, the commons should be seen as an emergent amalgamation of agonistic desires, practices and capacities that is meaningful only as long as it maintains its heterogeneity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信