{"title":"配对和非配对数据的主题集大小设计","authors":"T. Sakai","doi":"10.1145/3234944.3234971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Topic set size design is an approach to determining the sample sizes of an experiment (e.g., number of topics) based on a statistical requirement, namely a desired statistical power or a cap on the confidence interval (CI) width for the difference in means. Previous work considered paired data cases for a desired power of the t-test and for a cap on CI width, as well as unpaired data cases for a desired power of one-way ANOVA. In the present study, we consider unpaired (i.e., two-sample) cases for the t-test and for the CI width. Since one-way ANOVA with two groups is strictly equivalent to the two-sample t-test, we compare the outcomes of the topic set size design results based on these two approaches, and show that the one-way ANOVA-based approach actually returns tighter sample sizes than the two-sample t-test approach. Moreover, we compare the paired and unpaired cases for both t-test-based and CI-based topic set size design approaches. Because estimating the variance of the score differences for the paired data setting is problematic, we recommend the use of our unpaired-data versions of t-test-based and CI-based topic set size design tools, as they only require a variance estimate for individual scores and the appropriate sample sizes for unpaired data are also large enough for paired data.","PeriodicalId":193631,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topic Set Size Design for Paired and Unpaired Data\",\"authors\":\"T. Sakai\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3234944.3234971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Topic set size design is an approach to determining the sample sizes of an experiment (e.g., number of topics) based on a statistical requirement, namely a desired statistical power or a cap on the confidence interval (CI) width for the difference in means. Previous work considered paired data cases for a desired power of the t-test and for a cap on CI width, as well as unpaired data cases for a desired power of one-way ANOVA. In the present study, we consider unpaired (i.e., two-sample) cases for the t-test and for the CI width. Since one-way ANOVA with two groups is strictly equivalent to the two-sample t-test, we compare the outcomes of the topic set size design results based on these two approaches, and show that the one-way ANOVA-based approach actually returns tighter sample sizes than the two-sample t-test approach. Moreover, we compare the paired and unpaired cases for both t-test-based and CI-based topic set size design approaches. Because estimating the variance of the score differences for the paired data setting is problematic, we recommend the use of our unpaired-data versions of t-test-based and CI-based topic set size design tools, as they only require a variance estimate for individual scores and the appropriate sample sizes for unpaired data are also large enough for paired data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3234944.3234971\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3234944.3234971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Topic Set Size Design for Paired and Unpaired Data
Topic set size design is an approach to determining the sample sizes of an experiment (e.g., number of topics) based on a statistical requirement, namely a desired statistical power or a cap on the confidence interval (CI) width for the difference in means. Previous work considered paired data cases for a desired power of the t-test and for a cap on CI width, as well as unpaired data cases for a desired power of one-way ANOVA. In the present study, we consider unpaired (i.e., two-sample) cases for the t-test and for the CI width. Since one-way ANOVA with two groups is strictly equivalent to the two-sample t-test, we compare the outcomes of the topic set size design results based on these two approaches, and show that the one-way ANOVA-based approach actually returns tighter sample sizes than the two-sample t-test approach. Moreover, we compare the paired and unpaired cases for both t-test-based and CI-based topic set size design approaches. Because estimating the variance of the score differences for the paired data setting is problematic, we recommend the use of our unpaired-data versions of t-test-based and CI-based topic set size design tools, as they only require a variance estimate for individual scores and the appropriate sample sizes for unpaired data are also large enough for paired data.