配对和非配对数据的主题集大小设计

T. Sakai
{"title":"配对和非配对数据的主题集大小设计","authors":"T. Sakai","doi":"10.1145/3234944.3234971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Topic set size design is an approach to determining the sample sizes of an experiment (e.g., number of topics) based on a statistical requirement, namely a desired statistical power or a cap on the confidence interval (CI) width for the difference in means. Previous work considered paired data cases for a desired power of the t-test and for a cap on CI width, as well as unpaired data cases for a desired power of one-way ANOVA. In the present study, we consider unpaired (i.e., two-sample) cases for the t-test and for the CI width. Since one-way ANOVA with two groups is strictly equivalent to the two-sample t-test, we compare the outcomes of the topic set size design results based on these two approaches, and show that the one-way ANOVA-based approach actually returns tighter sample sizes than the two-sample t-test approach. Moreover, we compare the paired and unpaired cases for both t-test-based and CI-based topic set size design approaches. Because estimating the variance of the score differences for the paired data setting is problematic, we recommend the use of our unpaired-data versions of t-test-based and CI-based topic set size design tools, as they only require a variance estimate for individual scores and the appropriate sample sizes for unpaired data are also large enough for paired data.","PeriodicalId":193631,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topic Set Size Design for Paired and Unpaired Data\",\"authors\":\"T. Sakai\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3234944.3234971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Topic set size design is an approach to determining the sample sizes of an experiment (e.g., number of topics) based on a statistical requirement, namely a desired statistical power or a cap on the confidence interval (CI) width for the difference in means. Previous work considered paired data cases for a desired power of the t-test and for a cap on CI width, as well as unpaired data cases for a desired power of one-way ANOVA. In the present study, we consider unpaired (i.e., two-sample) cases for the t-test and for the CI width. Since one-way ANOVA with two groups is strictly equivalent to the two-sample t-test, we compare the outcomes of the topic set size design results based on these two approaches, and show that the one-way ANOVA-based approach actually returns tighter sample sizes than the two-sample t-test approach. Moreover, we compare the paired and unpaired cases for both t-test-based and CI-based topic set size design approaches. Because estimating the variance of the score differences for the paired data setting is problematic, we recommend the use of our unpaired-data versions of t-test-based and CI-based topic set size design tools, as they only require a variance estimate for individual scores and the appropriate sample sizes for unpaired data are also large enough for paired data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3234944.3234971\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3234944.3234971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

主题集大小设计是一种根据统计要求确定实验样本量(例如,主题数量)的方法,即期望的统计功率或平均值差异的置信区间(CI)宽度上限。以前的工作考虑了配对数据案例的t检验的期望功率和CI宽度上限,以及非配对数据案例的单向方差分析的期望功率。在本研究中,我们考虑未配对(即双样本)的情况下进行t检验和CI宽度。由于两组的单因素方差分析严格等同于两样本t检验,我们比较了基于这两种方法的主题集大小设计结果的结果,并表明基于单因素方差分析的方法实际上返回比两样本t检验方法更紧凑的样本量。此外,我们比较了基于t检验和基于ci的主题集大小设计方法的配对和非配对情况。因为估计成对数据设置的分数差异的方差是有问题的,我们建议使用我们的基于t检验和基于ci的主题集大小设计工具的非成对数据版本,因为它们只需要对单个分数进行方差估计,并且对成对数据来说,非成对数据的适当样本量也足够大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Topic Set Size Design for Paired and Unpaired Data
Topic set size design is an approach to determining the sample sizes of an experiment (e.g., number of topics) based on a statistical requirement, namely a desired statistical power or a cap on the confidence interval (CI) width for the difference in means. Previous work considered paired data cases for a desired power of the t-test and for a cap on CI width, as well as unpaired data cases for a desired power of one-way ANOVA. In the present study, we consider unpaired (i.e., two-sample) cases for the t-test and for the CI width. Since one-way ANOVA with two groups is strictly equivalent to the two-sample t-test, we compare the outcomes of the topic set size design results based on these two approaches, and show that the one-way ANOVA-based approach actually returns tighter sample sizes than the two-sample t-test approach. Moreover, we compare the paired and unpaired cases for both t-test-based and CI-based topic set size design approaches. Because estimating the variance of the score differences for the paired data setting is problematic, we recommend the use of our unpaired-data versions of t-test-based and CI-based topic set size design tools, as they only require a variance estimate for individual scores and the appropriate sample sizes for unpaired data are also large enough for paired data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信